Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 3/2014

01-09-2014

A Bifactor Model of Anxiety Sensitivity: Analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3

Auteurs: Chad Ebesutani, Alison C. McLeish, Christina M. Luberto, John Young, Danielle J. Maack

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 3/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the fit of a bifactor model of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3; Taylor et al. Psychological Assessment, 19, 176–188, 2007) as well as to examine measurement invariance of the ASI-3 across gender. Participants were undergraduate students from the University of Cincinnati (n = 954; 63 % female). Results indicated that the bifactor model was the best fit to the data, and that this model of AS is fully invariant in terms of gender. The current findings suggest that anxiety sensitivity consists of a general factor and three independent group factors (rather than a higher-order factor with three correlated lower-order factors). The ASI-3 subscales from the bifactor model however did not provide incremental predictive utility above and beyond the general AS factor with respect to an external anxiety criterion. Related research and clinical implications are discussed.
Voetnoten
1
It is important to remind readers and researchers that data derived from Likert-scales are ordinal (i.e., ordered-categorical data) and should be modeled as such (cf. Millsap and Yun-Tein 2004). Although some researchers have appropriately treated their ASI data as ordinal (e.g., Taylor et al. 2007), other researchers either did not treat their ASI data as ordinal or did not report how they treated their data (e.g., Armstrong et al. 2006; Bernstein et al. 2010; Osman et al. 2010).
 
2
It is notable that these cut-offs for “good model fit” were derived from simulation studies based on continuous data (e.g., Chen et al. 2008). Therefore, although these cut-offs are currently the best guidelines available to follow when conducting analyses on categorical data, the degree to which these cut-offs are applicable to categorical-based results (as in the present study) is largely unknown.
 
3
Regarding the 3-factor correlated traits model, all three subscales were significantly associated with one another. The correlation between the physical concerns and social concerns subscale was .56 (p < .001) and between the physical concerns and cognitive concerns subscales was .65 (p < .001). The correlation between the social and cognitive concerns subscale was .67 (p < .001).
 
4
The standard bivariate correlation coefficient between the ASI-3 total score and STAI total score was .59.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Armstrong, K. A., Khawaja, N. G., & Oei, T. P. S. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index—revised in clinical and normative populations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 116–126. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.116.CrossRef Armstrong, K. A., Khawaja, N. G., & Oei, T. P. S. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index—revised in clinical and normative populations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 116–126. doi:10.​1027/​1015-5759.​22.​2.​116.CrossRef
go back to reference Arnau, R. C., Broman-Fulks, J. J., Green, B. A., & Berman, M. E. (2009). The anxiety sensitivity index-revised: confirmatory factor analysis, structural invariance in Caucasian and African American samples, and score reliability and validity. Assessment, 16, 165–180. doi:10.1177/1073191108328809.PubMedCrossRef Arnau, R. C., Broman-Fulks, J. J., Green, B. A., & Berman, M. E. (2009). The anxiety sensitivity index-revised: confirmatory factor analysis, structural invariance in Caucasian and African American samples, and score reliability and validity. Assessment, 16, 165–180. doi:10.​1177/​1073191108328809​.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein, A., Stickle, T. R., Zvolensky, M. J., Taylor, S., Abramowitz, J., & Stewart, S. (2010). Dimensional, categorical, or dimensional-categories: Testing the latent structure of anxiety sensitivity among adults using factor-mixture modeling. Behavior Therapy, 41(4), 515–529. Bernstein, A., Stickle, T. R., Zvolensky, M. J., Taylor, S., Abramowitz, J., & Stewart, S. (2010). Dimensional, categorical, or dimensional-categories: Testing the latent structure of anxiety sensitivity among adults using factor-mixture modeling. Behavior Therapy, 41(4), 515–529.
go back to reference Blais, M. A., Otto, M. W., Zucker, B. G., McNally, R. J., Schmidt, N. B., Fava, M., et al. (2001). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index: item analysis and suggestions for refinement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 272–294. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_10.PubMedCrossRef Blais, M. A., Otto, M. W., Zucker, B. G., McNally, R. J., Schmidt, N. B., Fava, M., et al. (2001). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index: item analysis and suggestions for refinement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 272–294. doi:10.​1207/​S15327752JPA7702​_​10.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–159). Newbury Park: Sage. Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–159). Newbury Park: Sage.
go back to reference Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.CrossRef Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720.CrossRef Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.​1177/​0049124108314720​.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRef Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Chin, E., Ebesutani, C., Buchanan, E., & Young, J. (under review). Applying an exploratory bifactor analysis to the 21-item depression, anxiety, and stress scales. Chin, E., Ebesutani, C., Buchanan, E., & Young, J. (under review). Applying an exploratory bifactor analysis to the 21-item depression, anxiety, and stress scales.
go back to reference Deacon, B. J., Abramowitz, J. S., Woods, C. M., & Tolin, D. F. (2003). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index—revised: psychometric properties and factor structure in two nonclinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 12, 1427–1449.CrossRef Deacon, B. J., Abramowitz, J. S., Woods, C. M., & Tolin, D. F. (2003). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index—revised: psychometric properties and factor structure in two nonclinical samples. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 12, 1427–1449.CrossRef
go back to reference Ebesutani, C., Smith, A., Bernstein, A., Chorpita, B. F., Higa-McMillan, C., & Nakamura, B. J. (2011). A bifactor model of negative affectivity: fear and distress components among younger and older youth. Psychological Assessment, 23, 679–691. doi:10.1037/a0023234.PubMedCrossRef Ebesutani, C., Smith, A., Bernstein, A., Chorpita, B. F., Higa-McMillan, C., & Nakamura, B. J. (2011). A bifactor model of negative affectivity: fear and distress components among younger and older youth. Psychological Assessment, 23, 679–691. doi:10.​1037/​a0023234.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ebesutani, C., Reise, S., Chorpita, B. F., Ale, C., Regan, J., Young, J., et al. (2012). The revised child anxiety and depression scale—short version: scale reduction via exploratory bifactor modeling of the broad anxiety factor. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 833–845.PubMedCrossRef Ebesutani, C., Reise, S., Chorpita, B. F., Ale, C., Regan, J., Young, J., et al. (2012). The revised child anxiety and depression scale—short version: scale reduction via exploratory bifactor modeling of the broad anxiety factor. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 833–845.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Feldner, M. T., Zvolensky, M. J., Schmidt, N. B., & Smith, R. C. (2008). A prospective test of anxiety sensitivity as a moderator of the relation between gender and posttraumatic symptom maintenance among anxiety sensitive young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 190–199. doi:10.1002/da.20281.PubMedCrossRef Feldner, M. T., Zvolensky, M. J., Schmidt, N. B., & Smith, R. C. (2008). A prospective test of anxiety sensitivity as a moderator of the relation between gender and posttraumatic symptom maintenance among anxiety sensitive young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 190–199. doi:10.​1002/​da.​20281.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Flora, D., & Curran, P. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Flora, D., & Curran, P. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gustafsson, J., & Aberg-Bengtsson, L. (2010). Unidimensionality and the interpretability of psychological instruments. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs (pp. 97–121). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. Gustafsson, J., & Aberg-Bengtsson, L. (2010). Unidimensionality and the interpretability of psychological instruments. In S. E. Embretson (Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs (pp. 97–121). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
go back to reference Holgado-Tello, F., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44(1), 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y.CrossRef Holgado-Tello, F., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44(1), 153–166. doi:10.​1007/​s11135-008-9190-y.CrossRef
go back to reference Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.​1080/​1070551990954011​8.CrossRef
go back to reference Marshall, G. N., Miles, J. N., & Stewart, S. H. (2010). Anxiety sensitivity and PTSD symptom severity are reciprocally related: evidence from a longitudinal study of physical trauma survivors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 145–150. doi:10.1037/a0018009. Marshall, G. N., Miles, J. N., & Stewart, S. H. (2010). Anxiety sensitivity and PTSD symptom severity are reciprocally related: evidence from a longitudinal study of physical trauma survivors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 145–150. doi:10.​1037/​a0018009.
go back to reference McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah: Erlbaum. McDonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515.CrossRef Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515.CrossRef
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Author. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
go back to reference Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Psychometrika. Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Psychometrika.
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Olatunji, B. O., Sawchuk, C. N., Deacon, B. J., Tolin, D. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Williams, N. L. (2005). The anxiety sensitivity profile revisited: factor structure and psychometric properties in two nonclinical samples. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 603–625. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.08.005.CrossRef Olatunji, B. O., Sawchuk, C. N., Deacon, B. J., Tolin, D. F., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Williams, N. L. (2005). The anxiety sensitivity profile revisited: factor structure and psychometric properties in two nonclinical samples. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 6, 603–625. doi:10.​1016/​j.​janxdis.​2004.​08.​005.CrossRef
go back to reference Osman, A., Gutierrez, P., Smith, K., Fang, Q., Lozano, G., & Devine, A. (2010). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index–3: analyses of dimensions, reliability estimates, and correlates in nonclinical samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 45–52. doi:10.1080/00223890903379332.PubMedCrossRef Osman, A., Gutierrez, P., Smith, K., Fang, Q., Lozano, G., & Devine, A. (2010). The Anxiety Sensitivity Index–3: analyses of dimensions, reliability estimates, and correlates in nonclinical samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 45–52. doi:10.​1080/​0022389090337933​2.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reiss, S., & McNally, R. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–122). New York: Academic. Reiss, S., & McNally, R. (1985). Expectancy model of fear. In S. Reiss & R. R. Bootzin (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy (pp. 107–122). New York: Academic.
go back to reference Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364. doi:10.1037/h0090325.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R., & Jackson, R. J. (1997). The role of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: prospective evaluation of spontaneous panic attacks during acute stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 355–364. doi:10.​1037/​h0090325.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
go back to reference Spielberger, C. D. (1989). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A comprehensive bibliography (2nd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press. Spielberger, C. D. (1989). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: A comprehensive bibliography (2nd ed.). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
go back to reference Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
go back to reference Taylor, S., Zvolensky, M. J., Cox, B. J., Deacon, B., Heimberg, R. G., & Ledley, R. G. (2007). Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index–3. Psychological Assessment, 19, 176–188. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176.PubMedCrossRef Taylor, S., Zvolensky, M. J., Cox, B. J., Deacon, B., Heimberg, R. G., & Ledley, R. G. (2007). Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index–3. Psychological Assessment, 19, 176–188. doi:10.​1037/​1040-3590.​19.​2.​176.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Trent, L., Buchanan, E., Ebesutani, C., Ale, C. M., Heiden, L., Hight, T. L., et al. (2013). A measurement invariance examination of the revised child anxiety and depression scale in a Southern sample: differential item functioning between African-American and Caucasian youth. Assessment, 20(2), 175–187.PubMedCrossRef Trent, L., Buchanan, E., Ebesutani, C., Ale, C. M., Heiden, L., Hight, T. L., et al. (2013). A measurement invariance examination of the revised child anxiety and depression scale in a Southern sample: differential item functioning between African-American and Caucasian youth. Assessment, 20(2), 175–187.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van der Does, W., Duisjsens, I., Eurelings-Bontekoe, E., Verschnurr, M., & Spinhoven, P. (2003). Anxiety sensitivity profile: dimensional structure and relationship with temperament and character. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 72, 217–222. doi:10.1159/000070786.PubMedCrossRef Van der Does, W., Duisjsens, I., Eurelings-Bontekoe, E., Verschnurr, M., & Spinhoven, P. (2003). Anxiety sensitivity profile: dimensional structure and relationship with temperament and character. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 72, 217–222. doi:10.​1159/​000070786.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Yu, C., & Muthen, B. (2002, April). Evaluatio of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Yu, C., & Muthen, B. (2002, April). Evaluatio of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
go back to reference Zinbarg, R. E., Barlow, D. H., & Brown, T. A. (1997). Hierarchical structure and general factor saturation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index: evidence and implications. Psychological Assessment, 9, 277–284. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.3.277.CrossRef Zinbarg, R. E., Barlow, D. H., & Brown, T. A. (1997). Hierarchical structure and general factor saturation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index: evidence and implications. Psychological Assessment, 9, 277–284. doi:10.​1037/​1040-3590.​9.​3.​277.CrossRef
go back to reference Zinbarg, R. E., Mohlman, J., & Hong, N. N. (1999). Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 83–114). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Zinbarg, R. E., Mohlman, J., & Hong, N. N. (1999). Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Anxiety sensitivity: Theory, research, and treatment of the fear of anxiety (pp. 83–114). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω h : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. doi:10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7.CrossRef Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω h : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. doi:10.​1007/​s11336-003-0974-7.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
A Bifactor Model of Anxiety Sensitivity: Analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3
Auteurs
Chad Ebesutani
Alison C. McLeish
Christina M. Luberto
John Young
Danielle J. Maack
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-013-9400-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2014

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 3/2014 Naar de uitgave