Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2017

23-05-2016 | Brief Communication

Validation study of a Chinese version of Partners in Health in Hong Kong (C-PIH HK)

Auteurs: Teresa Mei Lee Chiu, Katharine Tai Wo Tam, Choi Fong Siu, Phyllis Wai Ping Chau, Malcolm Battersby

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Background

The Partners in Health (PIH) scale is a measure designed to assess the generic knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and impacts of self-management. A cross-cultural adaptation of the PIH for use in Hong Kong was evaluated in this study. This paper reports the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of PIH (C-PIH[HK]).

Method

A 12-item PIH was translated using forward–backward translation technique and reviewed by individuals with chronic diseases and health professionals. A total of 209 individuals with chronic diseases completed the scale. The construct validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability were evaluated in two waves.

Results

The findings in Wave 1 (n = 73) provided acceptable psychometric properties of the C-PIH(HK) but supported the adaptation of question 5 to improve the cultural relevance, validity, and reliability of the scale. An adapted version of C-PIH(HK) was evaluated in Wave 2. The findings in Wave 2 (n = 136) demonstrated good construct validity and internal consistency of C-PIH(HK). A principal component analysis with Oblimin rotation yielded a 3-factor solution, and the Cronbach’s alphas of the subscales ranged from 0.773 to 0.845. Participants were asked whether they perceived the self-management workshops they attended and education provided by health professionals as useful or not. The results showed that the C-PIH(HK) was able to discriminate those who agreed and those who disagreed related to the usefulness of individual health education (p < 0.0001 in all subscales) and workshops (p < 0.001 in the knowledge subscale) as hypothesized. The test–retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.818).

Conclusion

A culturally adapted version of PIH for use in Hong Kong was evaluated. The study supported good construct validity, discriminate validity, internal consistency, and test–retest reliability of the C-PIH(HK).
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
There are three versions of the PIH reported in the literature: (1) the original 11-item version [3]; (2) the Petkov 12-item version (version A) [4]; and (3) a later 12-item version (version B) [5]. Version A was revised from version B. Revisions included reversal of the 0–8 Likert scale and replacement of three items.
 
2
The correlation of C-PIH(HK) with heiQ was tested in Wave 1 but not in Wave 2.
 
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Battersby, M., Harvey, P., Mills, P. D., Kalucy, E., Pols, R. G., Frith, P. A., et al. (2007). SA HealthPlus: A controlled trial of a statewide application of a generic model of chronic illness care. Milbank Quarterly, 85(1), 37–67. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Battersby, M., Harvey, P., Mills, P. D., Kalucy, E., Pols, R. G., Frith, P. A., et al. (2007). SA HealthPlus: A controlled trial of a statewide application of a generic model of chronic illness care. Milbank Quarterly, 85(1), 37–67. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Lawn, S., & Schoo, A. (2010). Supporting self-management of chronic health conditions: Common approaches. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 205–211. CrossRefPubMed Lawn, S., & Schoo, A. (2010). Supporting self-management of chronic health conditions: Common approaches. Patient Education and Counseling, 80(2), 205–211. CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Battersby, M., Ask, A., Reece, M., Markwick, M., & Collins, J. (2003). The partners in health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 9, 41–52. CrossRef Battersby, M., Ask, A., Reece, M., Markwick, M., & Collins, J. (2003). The partners in health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 9, 41–52. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Petkov, J., Harvey, P., & Battersby, M. (2010). The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: Validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1079–1085. CrossRefPubMed Petkov, J., Harvey, P., & Battersby, M. (2010). The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: Validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measure. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1079–1085. CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Harvey, P. W., Petkov, J. N., Misan, G., Fuller, J., Battersby, M. W., Cayetano, T. N., et al. (2008). Self-management support and training for patients with chronic and complex conditions improves health-related behaviour and health outcomes. Australian Health Review, 32(2), 330–338. CrossRefPubMed Harvey, P. W., Petkov, J. N., Misan, G., Fuller, J., Battersby, M. W., Cayetano, T. N., et al. (2008). Self-management support and training for patients with chronic and complex conditions improves health-related behaviour and health outcomes. Australian Health Review, 32(2), 330–338. CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Peñarrieta-de Córdova, I., Florabel Barrios, F., Gutierrez-Gomes, T., Piñonez-Martinez, M. S., Quintero-Valle, L. M., & Castañeda-Hidalgo, H. (2014). Self-management in chronic conditions: Partners in health scale instrument validation. Nursing Management, 20(10), 32–37. CrossRefPubMed Peñarrieta-de Córdova, I., Florabel Barrios, F., Gutierrez-Gomes, T., Piñonez-Martinez, M. S., Quintero-Valle, L. M., & Castañeda-Hidalgo, H. (2014). Self-management in chronic conditions: Partners in health scale instrument validation. Nursing Management, 20(10), 32–37. CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Heijmans, M., Waverijn, G., Rademakers, J., van der Vaart, R., & Rijken, M. (2015). Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(1), 41–48. CrossRefPubMed Heijmans, M., Waverijn, G., Rademakers, J., van der Vaart, R., & Rijken, M. (2015). Functional, communicative and critical health literacy of chronic disease patients and their importance for self-management. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(1), 41–48. CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ghahari, S., Khoshbin, L. S., & Forwell, S. J. (2014). The multiple sclerosis self-management scale: Clinicometric testing. International Journal of MS Care, 16(2), 61–67. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ghahari, S., Khoshbin, L. S., & Forwell, S. J. (2014). The multiple sclerosis self-management scale: Clinicometric testing. International Journal of MS Care, 16(2), 61–67. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Gallagher, R. (2010). Self management, symptom monitoring and associated factors in people with heart failure living in the community. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 9(3), 153–160. CrossRefPubMed Gallagher, R. (2010). Self management, symptom monitoring and associated factors in people with heart failure living in the community. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 9(3), 153–160. CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gallagher, R., Donoghue, J., Chenoweth, L., & Stein-Parbury, J. (2008). Self-management in older patients with chronic illness. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 14(5), 373–382. CrossRefPubMed Gallagher, R., Donoghue, J., Chenoweth, L., & Stein-Parbury, J. (2008). Self-management in older patients with chronic illness. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 14(5), 373–382. CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. CrossRef Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., & Whitfield, K. (2007). The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(2), 192–201. CrossRefPubMed Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., & Whitfield, K. (2007). The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(2), 192–201. CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference IBM. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 20 (version 20). IBM. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 20 (version 20).
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation study of a Chinese version of Partners in Health in Hong Kong (C-PIH HK)
Auteurs
Teresa Mei Lee Chiu
Katharine Tai Wo Tam
Choi Fong Siu
Phyllis Wai Ping Chau
Malcolm Battersby
Publicatiedatum
23-05-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1315-5