Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Social-Emoti...

volgende artikel “I Don’t Know What I Would Have Done Without My...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

15-07-2020 | ORIGINAL PAPER | Uitgave 9/2020 Open Access

Validation of the German Version of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ)

Tijdschrift:: Mindfulness > Uitgave 9/2020

Auteurs:: Kerem Böge, Carmen Schaeuffele, Pamela Jacobsen, Paul Chadwick, Emre Ergen, Inge Hahne, Niklas Bergmann, Johanna Boettcher, Katja Wingenfeld, Malek Bajbouj, Eric Hahn

» Naar de volledige tekst

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to assess the convergent and divergent validity, reliability, utility, and treatment sensitivity of a newly translated German version of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). The SMQ is a 16-item instrument measuring mindful awareness of distressing thoughts, images, and perceptions, developed originally within the mindfulness for psychosis field.

Methods

Overall, three studies were conducted, comprising (1) a non-clinical sample of n = 848 (638 community sample and 210 meditators); (2) a clinical sample of n = 213 (106 schizophrenia and 107 depression); and (3) a clinical sample with n = 122 participants with emotional disorders within a randomized controlled study, of which 30 participants were also included in study 2. To assess convergent validity, participants completed the SMQ, Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI), and Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME). To measure divergent validity, participants completed the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaires (BEAQ), and Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 (ASI-3).

Results

Mean internal consistency (α = 0.89) and convergent (r = 0.66 to 0.73) and divergent validity (r = − 0.09 to − 0.50) were established and sensitivity to change over time following treatment (d = 0.86) was shown. For the clinical sample, a single-factor structure is suggested by principal component analysis.

Conclusions

Results provide first evidence for the utility of the German version of the SMQ for clinical practice and research in healthy individuals, meditators, and clinical groups. Further research is needed to examine the underlying construct of mindfulness.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC.

Baer, R. A. (2007). Mindfulness, assessment, and transdiagnostic processes. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598306. CrossRef

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029. PubMedCrossRef

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Barlow, D. H., Allen, L. B., & Choate, M. L. (2016). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders–republished article. Behavior Therapy, 47(6), 838–853. PubMedCrossRef

Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Sauer-Zavala, S., Latin, H. M., Ellard, K. K., Bullis, J. R., et al. (2018). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: therapist guide (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Belzer, F., Schmidt, S., & Lucius-Hoene, G. (2011). Freiburger Fragebogen zur Achtsamkeit im kognitiven Interview. Analyse der Beantwortungsprozesse in Abhängigkeit von Achtsamkeitserfahrung. Bern, Switzerland: 3rd Conference of the Mindfulness Research Network.

Belzer, F., Schmidt, S., Lucius-Hoene, G., Schneider, J. F., Orellana-Rios, C. L., & Sauer, S. (2013). Challenging the construct validity of mindfulness assessment-a cognitive interview study of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Mindfulness, 4(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0165-7. CrossRef

Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). Measuring mindfulness: first steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9. CrossRef

Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2014). Konstruktion und erste Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung von Achtsamkeit. Diagnostica.

Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2015). Meditation practice and self-reported mindfulness: a cross-sectional investigation of meditators and non-meditators using the Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME). Mindfulness, 6(6), 1411–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0415-6. CrossRef

Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph077. CrossRef

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bph078. CrossRef

Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy : the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal of Meditation and Meditation Research, 1(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1411318. CrossRef

Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-007-9130-7. PubMedCrossRef

Chadwick, P., Taylor, K. N., & Abba, N. (2005). Mindfulness groups for people with psychosis. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465805002158. CrossRef

Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. PubMedCrossRef

Christopher, M. S., Woodrich, L. E., & Tiernan, K. A. (2014). Using cognitive interviews to assess the cultural validity of state and trait measures of mindfulness among Zen Buddhists. Mindfulness, 5(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0160-z. PubMedCrossRef

Derogatis, L. R. (2001). BSI 18, Brief Symptom Inventory 18: administration, scoring and procedures manual. NCS Pearson.

Derogatis, L. R., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2004). The SCL-90-R, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the BSI-18. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for Adults. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

DGPPN (2018). Psychische Erkrankungen in Deutschland: Schwerpunkt Versorgung. Retrieved 13 February 2020, from https://www.dgppn.de/_Resources/Persistent/f80fb3f112b4eda48f6c5f3c68d23632a03ba599/DGPPN_Dossierweb.pdf.

Dimidjian, S., & Linehan, M. M. (2003). Defining an agenda for future research on the clinical application of mindfulness practice. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg019. CrossRef

Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8. CrossRef

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286.

Franke, G. H., Ankerhold, A., Haase, M., Jäger, S., Tögel, C., Ulrich, C., & Frommer, J. (2011). Der Einsatz des Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) bei Psychotherapiepatienten. = the usefulness of the Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18) in psychotherapeutic patients. PPmP: Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 61(2), 82–86.

Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., & Watson, D. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: the Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 692-713. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023242.

Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., Suzuki, N., & Watson, D. (2014). The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034473.

Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 405-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.02.001.

Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23, 1034-1040 . https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022713.

Heidenreich, T., Ströhle, G., & Michalak, J. (2006). Achtsamkeit: Konzeptuelle Aspekte und Ergebnisse zum Freiburger Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Verhaltenstherapie, 16(1), 33–40. CrossRef

Höfling, V., Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Heidenreich, T. (2011). Mindfulness or mindlessness? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000045.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5–2.918. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living : Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York: Delacorte Press.

Kemper, C. J., Ziegler, M., & Taylor, S. (2009). Überprüfung der psychometrischen Qualität der deutschen Versiondes Angstsensitivitätsindex-3. Diagnostica, 55(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.4.223. CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Kohls, N., Sauer, S., & Walach, H. (2009). Facets of mindfulness – results of an online study investigating the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2008.10.009. CrossRef

Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer Deutschen version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.

Mahoney, C. T., Segal, D. L., & Coolidge, F. L. (2015). Anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, and mindfulness among younger and older adults: age differences in risk factors for anxiety symptoms. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 81(4), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415015621309. CrossRef

Margraf, J., Cwik, J. C., Pflug, V., & Schneider, S. (2017). Strukturierte klinische Interviews zur Erfassung psychischer Störungen über die Lebensspanne. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 46, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000430.

Öztuna, D., Elhan, A. H., & Tüccar, E. (2006). Investigation of four different normality tests in terms of type 1 error rate and power under different distributions. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(3), 171–176.

Prinz, U., Nutzinger, D. O., Schulz, H., Petermann, F., Braukhaus, C., & Andreas, S. (2013). Comparative psychometric analyses of the SCL-90-R and its short versions in patients with affective disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-104. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36 URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/. CrossRef

Safran, J. D., & Segal, Z. V. (1990). Interpersonal process in cognitive therapy. Basic Books.

Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 347–363. CrossRef

Sauer, S., Walach, H., Offenbächer, M., Lynch, S., & Kohls, N. (2011). Measuring mindfulness: a Rasch analysis of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Religions, 2(4), 693–706. CrossRef

Taylor, S., Zvolensky, M. J., Cox, B. J., Deacon, B., Heimberg, R. G., Ledley, D. R., et al. (2007). Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity: development and initial validation of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 176-188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.176.

Van der Eijk, C., & Rose, J. (2015). Risky business: factor analysis of survey data–assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation. PLoS One, 10(3), e0118900. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555. CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.

Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: an evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. CrossRef

World Health Organization. (2014). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved 12 February 2020, from https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.

Titel: Validation of the German Version of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ)
Auteurs:: Kerem Böge
Carmen Schaeuffele
Pamela Jacobsen
Paul Chadwick
Emre Ergen
Inge Hahne
Niklas Bergmann
Johanna Boettcher
Katja Wingenfeld
Malek Bajbouj
Eric Hahn
Publicatiedatum: 15-07-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01447-x
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Mindfulness
Uitgave 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Validation of the German Version of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ)

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Publisher’s Note

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2020

Caregivers of Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Psychosocial Factors and Evidence for Self-compassion as a Potential Intervention Target

Online Mindfulness Stress Intervention for Family Carers of Children and Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

A Systematic Narrative Review on Stress-Management Interventions for Medical Students

The Role of Nonattachment in the Development of Adolescent Mental Health: a Three-Year Longitudinal Study

A Systematic Review of Mindfulness Interventions on Psychophysiological Responses to Acute Stress

Trait Mindfulness Moderates Reactivity to Social Stress in an All-Male Sample