Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2014

01-04-2014 | Brief Communication

The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients

Auteurs: Juan Ignacio Arraras, Fernando Arias de la Vega, Gemma Asin, Mikel Rico, Uxue Zarandona, Clara Eito, Koldo Cambra, Marta Barrondo, Marta Errasti, Juan Verdún, Jose Rivadeneira, Miguel Angel Dominguez

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Quality of life (QL) is a key outcome for advanced disease cancer patients. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has developed the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire, a short version of the QLQ-C30 for palliative care. The aim of the present study is to validate the QLQ-C15-PAL for use with Spanish patients with bone metastasis.

Methods

For this study, we used a consecutive sample of stage IV cancer patients with bone metastases who started radiotherapy with palliative intention. Two assessments were proposed for each patient: one on the first day of treatment and one a month after the end of the radiotherapy sessions. Psychometric evaluation of the structure, reliability, and validity was undertaken.

Results

One hundred and sixteen patients completed the first questionnaire and seventy five completed the second. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that all items met the standards for convergent validity, and all except the fatigue scale met the standards for divergent validity. Cronbach’s coefficient met the 0.7 alpha criterion on all scales except pain (second assessment). Most QLQ-C15-PAL areas had low-to-moderate correlations with the other areas. Significant differences appeared in the comparisons between groups with regard to: patients who died before the second assessment (six areas); patients receiving chemotherapy before starting radiotherapy in the two assessments (three and four areas, respectively); the performance status in the two assessments (nine and eight areas); and the number of RT sessions received (four). Quality of life was better in the second assessment in nine areas.

Conclusion

The QLQ-C15-PAL is a reliable and valid instrument when applied to a sample of Spanish patients. These results are in line with those of other validation studies.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Caissie, A., Zeng, L., Nguyen, J., Zhang, L., Jon, F., Dennis, K., et al. (2012). Assessment of health-related quality of life with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL after palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists), 24(2), 125–133.CrossRef Caissie, A., Zeng, L., Nguyen, J., Zhang, L., Jon, F., Dennis, K., et al. (2012). Assessment of health-related quality of life with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL after palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases. Clinical Oncology (Royal College of Radiologists), 24(2), 125–133.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Soelver, L., Oestergaard, B., Rydahl-Hansen, S., & Wagner, L. (2012). Advanced cancer patients’ self-assessed physical and emotional problems on admission and discharge from hospital general wards—a questionnaire study. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), 21(5), 667–676.CrossRef Soelver, L., Oestergaard, B., Rydahl-Hansen, S., & Wagner, L. (2012). Advanced cancer patients’ self-assessed physical and emotional problems on admission and discharge from hospital general wards—a questionnaire study. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), 21(5), 667–676.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Blazeby, J. M., Bottomley, A., et al. (2006). The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 42(1), 55–64.PubMedCrossRef Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Blazeby, J. M., Bottomley, A., et al. (2006). The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 42(1), 55–64.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2003). Quality of life in palliative care: Principles and practice. Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 11–20.PubMedCrossRef Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2003). Quality of life in palliative care: Principles and practice. Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 11–20.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lien, K., Zeng, L., Nguyen, J., Cramarossa, G., Culleton, S., Caissie, A., et al. (2011). Comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Pal for assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(5), 541–547.PubMedCrossRef Lien, K., Zeng, L., Nguyen, J., Cramarossa, G., Culleton, S., Caissie, A., et al. (2011). Comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and the FACIT-Pal for assessment of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11(5), 541–547.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Miyazaki, K., Suzukamo, Y., Shimozuma, K., & Nakayama, T. (2012). Verification of the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 palliative (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL). Quality of Life Research, 21(2), 335–340.PubMedCrossRef Miyazaki, K., Suzukamo, Y., Shimozuma, K., & Nakayama, T. (2012). Verification of the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 palliative (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL). Quality of Life Research, 21(2), 335–340.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9.PubMed Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRef Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Blazeby, J., Brandberg, Y., de Graeff, A., et al. (2006). Item response theory was used to shorten EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use in palliative care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(1), 36–44.PubMedCrossRef Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Blazeby, J., Brandberg, Y., de Graeff, A., et al. (2006). Item response theory was used to shorten EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use in palliative care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(1), 36–44.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bjorner, J. B., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Arraras, J. I., et al. (2004). Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Quality of Life Research, 13(10), 1683–1697.PubMedCrossRef Bjorner, J. B., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Arraras, J. I., et al. (2004). Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Quality of Life Research, 13(10), 1683–1697.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Blazeby, J. M., Bottomley, A., et al. (2006). EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: the new standard in the assessment of health-related quality of life in advanced cancer? Palliative Medicine, 20(2), 59–61.PubMedCrossRef Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Blazeby, J. M., Bottomley, A., et al. (2006). EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: the new standard in the assessment of health-related quality of life in advanced cancer? Palliative Medicine, 20(2), 59–61.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Taphoorn, M. J., Claassens, L., Aaronson, N. K., Coens, C., Mauer, M., Osoba, D., et al. (2010). An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 46(6), 1033–1040.PubMedCrossRef Taphoorn, M. J., Claassens, L., Aaronson, N. K., Coens, C., Mauer, M., Osoba, D., et al. (2010). An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 46(6), 1033–1040.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vivat, B., Young, T., Efficace, F., Sigurdadóttir, V., Arraras, J. I., Asgeirsdóttir, G. H., et al. (2013). Cross-cultural development of the EORTC QLQ-SWB36: A stand-alone measure of spiritual wellbeing for palliative care patients with cancer. Palliative Medicine, 27(5), 457–469.PubMedCrossRef Vivat, B., Young, T., Efficace, F., Sigurdadóttir, V., Arraras, J. I., Asgeirsdóttir, G. H., et al. (2013). Cross-cultural development of the EORTC QLQ-SWB36: A stand-alone measure of spiritual wellbeing for palliative care patients with cancer. Palliative Medicine, 27(5), 457–469.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cull, A., Sprangers, M., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N. K., & West, K. (2002). EORTC quality of life group translation procedure (2nd ed.). Brussels: EORTC. Cull, A., Sprangers, M., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N. K., & West, K. (2002). EORTC quality of life group translation procedure (2nd ed.). Brussels: EORTC.
15.
go back to reference Karnofsky, D. A., & Burchenal, J. H. (1948). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In C. M. McLeod (Ed.), Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents (pp. 199–205). New York: Colombia University. Karnofsky, D. A., & Burchenal, J. H. (1948). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In C. M. McLeod (Ed.), Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents (pp. 199–205). New York: Colombia University.
16.
go back to reference Tabachnik, B. J., & Fidell, L. S. (1993). Using multivariate statistics. London: Harper & Row. Tabachnik, B. J., & Fidell, L. S. (1993). Using multivariate statistics. London: Harper & Row.
17.
go back to reference Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., Rogers, B. W., & Reese, P. R. (1997). MAP-R for windows: Multitrait multi-item analysis program—revised user’s guide. Boston: Health Assessment Lab. Ware, J. E., Harris, W. J., Gandek, B., Rogers, B. W., & Reese, P. R. (1997). MAP-R for windows: Multitrait multi-item analysis program—revised user’s guide. Boston: Health Assessment Lab.
18.
go back to reference Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297.CrossRef Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Arraras, J. I., Arias, F., Tejedor, M., Pruja, E., Marcos, M., Martínez, E., et al. (2002). The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) quality of life questionnaire: Validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients. Psychooncology, 11(3), 249–256.PubMedCrossRef Arraras, J. I., Arias, F., Tejedor, M., Pruja, E., Marcos, M., Martínez, E., et al. (2002). The EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) quality of life questionnaire: Validation study for Spain with head and neck cancer patients. Psychooncology, 11(3), 249–256.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1998). Using reference data on quality of life–the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). European Journal of Cancer, 34(9), 1381–1389.PubMedCrossRef Hjermstad, M. J., Fayers, P. M., Bjordal, K., & Kaasa, S. (1998). Using reference data on quality of life–the importance of adjusting for age and gender, exemplified by the EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). European Journal of Cancer, 34(9), 1381–1389.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steinmann, D., Schäfer, C., van Oorschot, B., Wypior, H. J., Bruns, F., Bölling, T., et al. (2009). Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 185(3), 190–197.PubMedCrossRef Steinmann, D., Schäfer, C., van Oorschot, B., Wypior, H. J., Bruns, F., Bölling, T., et al. (2009). Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 185(3), 190–197.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(1), 139–144.PubMed Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B., & Pater, J. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(1), 139–144.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Middel, B., & Van Sonderen, E. (2002). Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2(17), 1–18. Middel, B., & Van Sonderen, E. (2002). Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2(17), 1–18.
24.
go back to reference Caissie, A., Nguyen, J., Chen, E., Zhang, L., Sahgal, A., Clemons, M., et al. (2012). Quality of life in patients with brain metastases using the EORTC QLQ-BN20+2 and QLQ-C15-PAL. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 83(4), 1238–1245.CrossRef Caissie, A., Nguyen, J., Chen, E., Zhang, L., Sahgal, A., Clemons, M., et al. (2012). Quality of life in patients with brain metastases using the EORTC QLQ-BN20+2 and QLQ-C15-PAL. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 83(4), 1238–1245.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hermann, K., Engeser, P., Szecsenyi, J., & Miksch, A. (2012). Palliative patients cared for at home by PAMINO-trained and other GPs. Health-related quality of life as measured by QLQ-C15-PAL and POS. BioMed Central Palliative Care, 11(1), 13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hermann, K., Engeser, P., Szecsenyi, J., & Miksch, A. (2012). Palliative patients cared for at home by PAMINO-trained and other GPs. Health-related quality of life as measured by QLQ-C15-PAL and POS. BioMed Central Palliative Care, 11(1), 13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shin, K., Zeng, L., Chen, E., Zhang, L., Culleton, S., Dennis, K., et al. (2012). Do elderly patients with metastatic cancer have worse quality of life scores? Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(9), 2121–2127.CrossRef Shin, K., Zeng, L., Chen, E., Zhang, L., Culleton, S., Dennis, K., et al. (2012). Do elderly patients with metastatic cancer have worse quality of life scores? Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(9), 2121–2127.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Suárez-del-Real, Y., Allende-Pérez, S., Alférez-Mancera, A., Rodríguez, R. B., Jiménez-Toxtle, S., Mohar, A., et al. (2001). Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients on palliative care. Psychooncology, 20(8), 889–896.CrossRef Suárez-del-Real, Y., Allende-Pérez, S., Alférez-Mancera, A., Rodríguez, R. B., Jiménez-Toxtle, S., Mohar, A., et al. (2001). Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients on palliative care. Psychooncology, 20(8), 889–896.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Caissie, A., Culleton, S., Nguyen, J., Zhang, L., Zeng, L., Holden, L., et al. (2012). EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL quality of life scores in patients with advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(4), 841–848.PubMedCrossRef Caissie, A., Culleton, S., Nguyen, J., Zhang, L., Zeng, L., Holden, L., et al. (2012). EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL quality of life scores in patients with advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(4), 841–848.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Koo, K., Zeng, L., Chen, E., Zhang, L., Culleton, S., Dennis, K., et al. (2012). Do elderly patients with metastatic cancer have worse quality of life scores? Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(9), 2121–2127.PubMedCrossRef Koo, K., Zeng, L., Chen, E., Zhang, L., Culleton, S., Dennis, K., et al. (2012). Do elderly patients with metastatic cancer have worse quality of life scores? Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(9), 2121–2127.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Steinmann, D., Paelecke-Habermann, Y., Geinitz, H., Aschoff, R., Bayerl, A., Bölling, T., et al. (2012). Prospective evaluation of quality of life effects in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases. BioMed Central Cancer, 10(12), 283. Steinmann, D., Paelecke-Habermann, Y., Geinitz, H., Aschoff, R., Bayerl, A., Bölling, T., et al. (2012). Prospective evaluation of quality of life effects in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases. BioMed Central Cancer, 10(12), 283.
Metagegevens
Titel
The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire: validation study for Spanish bone metastases patients
Auteurs
Juan Ignacio Arraras
Fernando Arias de la Vega
Gemma Asin
Mikel Rico
Uxue Zarandona
Clara Eito
Koldo Cambra
Marta Barrondo
Marta Errasti
Juan Verdún
Jose Rivadeneira
Miguel Angel Dominguez
Publicatiedatum
01-04-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0511-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2014

Quality of Life Research 3/2014 Naar de uitgave