Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Mental well-being has aroused interest in Europe as an indicator of population health. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) was developed in the United Kingdom showing good face validity and has been previously adapted into Spanish. The aim of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of WEMWBS in the general population.
Cross-sectional home face-to-face interview survey with computer-assisted personal interviewing was administered with the 2011 Catalan Health Interview Survey Wave 3, which is representative of the non-institutionalized general population of Catalonia, Spain. A total of 1,900 participants 15+ years of age were interviewed. The Spanish version of WEMWBS was administered together with socioeconomic and health-related variables, with a hypothesized level of association.
Similar to the original, confirmatory factor analysis fits a one-factor model adequately (CFI = 0.974; TLI = 0.970; RMSEA = 0.059; χ2 = 584.82; df = 77; p < .001) and has a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.930; Guttman’s lambda 2 = 0.932). The WEMWBS discriminated between population groups in all health-related and socioeconomic variables, except in gender (p = 0.119), with a magnitude similar to that hypothesized. Overall, mental well-being was higher for the general population of Catalonia (average and whole distribution) than that for Scotland general population.
The Spanish version of WEMWBS showed good psychometric properties similar to the UK original scale. Whether better mental well-being in Catalonia is due to methodological or substantive cultural, social, or environmental factors should be further researched.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Abdallah, S., Mahony, S., Marks, N., Michaelson, J., Seaford, C., Stoll, L. et al. (2011). http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/measuring-our-progress. Accessed 15 Sep 2012.
Organisation for Economic and Co-operation and Development (2007). http://www.oecd.org/. Accessed 1 Sep 2012.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64, 678–691. CrossRef
Huppert, F. A., & Wittington, J. E. (2012). Positive mental health in individuals and populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2012). Positive psychology in practice. NJ: Wiley.
Tennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2012). Monitoring positive mental health in Scotland: validating the Affectometer 2 scale and developing the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being scale for the UK. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland.
The Scottish Government (2011). http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Statistics/Browse/Health/scottish-health-survey. Accessed 12 July 2012.
Bench, P. (2004). Measuring the dimensions of psychological general well-being by the WHO-5. QoL Newsletter,32, 15–16.
Stoll, L., Michaelson, J., & Seaford, C. (2012). http://www.neweconomics.org/sites/neweconomics.org/files/Well-being_Evidence_for_Policy_final.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2012.
IDESCAT. (2008). www.gencat.cat/salut/esca. Accessed 8 March 2012.
Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the General Health questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
Lobo, A., & Muñoz, P. E. (1996). Cuestionario de salud general GHQ (General Health Questionnaire). Guía para el usuario de las distintas versiones en lengua española validadas. Barcelona: Masson.
Sanchez-Lopez, M. P., & Dresch, V. (2008). The 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): Reliability, external validity and factor structure in the Spanish population. Psicothema,20, 839–843.
The EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQoL -A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy,16, 199–208. CrossRef
Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,38, 171–189. CrossRef
Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,45, 19–30. CrossRef
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling,6, 1–55. CrossRef
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the anlaysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin,88, 58–77. CrossRef
Bentler, P. M. (2008). Alpha, dimension-free and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika,74, 137–143. CrossRef
Helms, J., Henze, K., Sass, T., & Mifsud, V. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha realiability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist,34, 630–660. CrossRef
Weir, J. P. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res,19, 231–240. PubMed
Streiner, G. L., & Normal, R. D. (1989). Health measurement scales a practical guide a their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, A. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2010). MPlus user’s guide (1998–2010). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Eurostat. (2011). http://www.idescat.cat. Accessed 26 July 2011.
Michaelson, J., Mahony, S., & Schifferes, J. (2012). http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/measuring-well-being. Accessed 23 Aug 2012.
Stewart-Brown, S., Tennant, A., Tennant, R., Platt, S., Parkinson, J., & Weich, S. (2009). Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): A Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish Health Education Population Survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes,7, 15–23. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
- The Spanish version of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is valid for use in the general population
Carlos G. Forero
- Springer International Publishing