Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2012 | Brief Communication

Verification of the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 palliative (EORTCQLQ-C15-PAL)

Auteurs: Kikuko Miyazaki, Yoshimi Suzukamo, Kojiro Shimozuma, Takeo Nakayama

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2012

Abstract

Purpose

We compared Japanese versions of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-C30 to assess the utility of the former survey for terminal-phase cancer patients.

Methods

We used QLQ-C30 scores from the survey prior to each patient’s death and extracted QLQ-C15-PAL data. We determined intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the five QLQ-C15-PAL subscales: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and global health status/quality of life (QOL) and assessed equivalent-form reliability. Regression analysis was used to determine the extent to which QLQ-C15-PAL items explained the QLQ-C30 score.

Results

Our study included 32 of 91 cancer patients receiving palliative care who could self-administer the questionnaire. The ICC between the QLQ-C15-PAL and QLQ-C30 scores was 0.93 or higher. The proportion of variance (R-squared) for each subscale was 0.87 or higher.

Conclusion

We examined the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the QLQ-C15-PAL. We found an 87% or higher chance that the QLQ-C15-PAL could explain the original QLQ-C30 score. Therefore, QLQ-C15-PAL appears to be useful for assessing the QOL of terminal-phase cancer patients.

vorige artikel Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the national eye institute visual-function questionnaire-25 for utility estimation

volgende artikel Development of the PedsQL™ sickle cell disease module items: qualitative methods

World Health Organization. (2002). Pain relief and palliative care (2nd ed.). National Cancer control Programmes: Policies and managerial guideline, Geneva, pp 83–92.

Kaasa, S., & Loge, J. H. (2003). Quality of life in palliative care: principals and practice. Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 11–20.PubMedCrossRef

Cohen, S. R., Mount, B. M., Bruera, E., Provost, M., Rowe, J., & Tong, K. (1997). Validity of the McGill quality of life questionnaire in the palliative care setting: A multi-center Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain. Palliative Medicine, 11(1), 3–7.PubMedCrossRef

Sterkenburg, C., King, B., & Woodward, C. A. (1996). A reliability and validity study of the McMaster quality of life scale (MQLS) for a palliative population. Journal of Palliative Care, 12(1), 18–25.PubMed

Lyons, K. D., Bakitas, M., Hegel, M. T., Hanscom, B., Hull, J., & Ahles, T. A. (2009). Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-palliative care (FACIT-Pal) scale. Journal of Pain Symptom Management, 37(1), 23–32.CrossRef

Tsujikawa, M., Yokoyama, K., Urakawa, K., & Onishi, K. (2009). Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire assessed by application in palliative care wards. Palliative Medicine, 23(7), 659–664.PubMedCrossRef

Kobayashi, K., Green, J., Shimonagayoshi, M., Kanemoto, N., Kasai, R., Itoh, Y., et al. (2005). Validation of the care notebook for measuring physical, mental and life well-being of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 14(4), 1035–1043.PubMedCrossRef

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.PubMedCrossRef

Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. British Medical Journal, 324(15), 1–5.

10.

Park, K. U. (2008). Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC core quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample. Oncology, 74(Suppl. 1), 7–12.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Blazeby, J., Brandberg, Y., de Graeff, A., et al. (2006). Item response theory was used to shorten EORTC QLQ-C30 scales for use in palliative care. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(1), 36–44.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Bjorner, J. B., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., Aaronson, N., Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., Arraras, J. I., et al. (2004). Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale. Quality of Life Research, 13(10), 1683–1697.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Blazeby, J. M., Bottomley, A., et al. (2006). The development of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: A shortened questionnaire for cancer patients in palliative care. European Journal of Cancer, 42(1), 55–64.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Kobayashi, K., Takeda, F., Teramukai, S., Gotoh, I., Sakai, H., Yoneda, S., et al. (1998). A cross-validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) for Japanese with lung cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 34(6), 810–815.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Fayers, P. M., & Marchin, D. (2000). Questionnaire development and scoring. In P. M. Fayers & D. Marchin (Eds.), Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation (pp. 135–152). Chichester: Wiley.

16.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef

17.

Bartko, J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762–765.CrossRef

18.

Fayers, P. M., & Marchin, D. (2000). Scores and measurements: Validity, reliability, sensitivity. In P. M. Fayers & D. Marchin (Eds.), Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation (pp. 45–71). Chichester: Wiley.

19.

Echteld, M. A., Deliens, L., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B., Klein, M., & van der Wal, G. (2006). EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related quality of life in advanced cancer? Palliative Medicine, 20(1), 1–2.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. A., Aaronson, N. K., Arraras, J. I., Blazeby, J. M., Bottomley, A., et al. (2006). EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL: The new standard in the assessment of health-related quality of life in advanced cancer? Palliative Medicine, 20(2), 59–61.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Verification of the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 palliative (EORTCQLQ-C15-PAL)
Auteurs: Kikuko Miyazaki
Yoshimi Suzukamo
Kojiro Shimozuma
Takeo Nakayama
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2012
Uitgeverij: Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9939-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2012

Perceived health in lung cancer patients: the role of positive and negative affect

Use of the Distress Thermometer to discern clinically relevant quality of life differences in women with breast cancer

Rasch analysis in the development of a simplified version of the national eye institute visual-function questionnaire-25 for utility estimation

Quality of life in pregnancy and post-partum: a study in diabetic patients

Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods

The validity of subjective quality of life measures in psychotic patients with severe psychopathology and cognitive deficits: an item response model analysis