Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2021

18-11-2019 | Original Article

The effect of unitization on associative recognition was not moderated by the unitization–congruence between original and rearranged picture pairs (UC) for picture stimuli

Auteurs: Zejun Liu, Jun Wu, Chunyan Guo

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

It is widely accepted that associative recognition can be supported by familiarity through integrating more than two stimuli into a unit, but the role of unitization in recollection-based associative recognition remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to illustrate how the level of unitization (LOU) affected recollection-based associative recognition and to examine whether the unitization–congruence between original and rearranged picture pairs (UC) could have effect on the relationship between LOU and associative recognition. In encoding, participants were asked to learn related and unrelated picture pairs, and in retrieval, they needed to distinguish intact pairs from rearranged pairs. We also distinguished the LOU of the pairs based on its status at encoding or retrieval separately. The results showed that: (1) LOU-at-encoding could improve associative recognition through increasing recollection-based associative recognition selectively; (2) LOU-at-retrieval could improve associative recognition through increasing familiarity-based and recollection-based associative recognitions; (3) UC did not moderate the relationship between LOU and associative recognition. Hence, in future studies, researchers do not need to pay much attention to the construction of rearranged pairs to ensure that the LOU between original and rearranged picture pairs is matched. It greatly reduces the difficulty of materials selection.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Ahmad, F. N., Fernandes, M., & Hockley, W. E. (2015). Improving associative memory in older adults with unitization. Neuropsychology, Development, and cognition. Section B Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 22(4), 452–472.CrossRef Ahmad, F. N., Fernandes, M., & Hockley, W. E. (2015). Improving associative memory in older adults with unitization. Neuropsychology, Development, and cognition. Section B Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 22(4), 452–472.CrossRef
go back to reference Bader, R., Mecklinger, A., Hoppstädter, M., & Meyer, P. (2010). Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroimage, 50, 772–781.CrossRef Bader, R., Mecklinger, A., Hoppstädter, M., & Meyer, P. (2010). Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuroimage, 50, 772–781.CrossRef
go back to reference Bastin, C., Diana, R. A., Simon, J., Collette, F., Yonelinas, A. P., & Salmon, E. (2013). Associative memory in aging: the effect of unitization on source memory. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 275–283.CrossRef Bastin, C., Diana, R. A., Simon, J., Collette, F., Yonelinas, A. P., & Salmon, E. (2013). Associative memory in aging: the effect of unitization on source memory. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 275–283.CrossRef
go back to reference Borders, A. A., Aly, M., Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2017). The hippocampus is particularly important for building associations across stimulus domains. Neuropsychologia, 99, 335–342.CrossRef Borders, A. A., Aly, M., Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2017). The hippocampus is particularly important for building associations across stimulus domains. Neuropsychologia, 99, 335–342.CrossRef
go back to reference *Bridger, E. K., Kursawe, A. L., Bader, R., Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Levy, D. A., et al. (2017). Age effects on associative memory for novel picture pairings. Brain Research, 1664, 102–115.CrossRef *Bridger, E. K., Kursawe, A. L., Bader, R., Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Levy, D. A., et al. (2017). Age effects on associative memory for novel picture pairings. Brain Research, 1664, 102–115.CrossRef
go back to reference Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 923–938.CrossRef Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 923–938.CrossRef
go back to reference Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using erps to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(2), 191–205.CrossRef Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using erps to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(2), 191–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Delhaye, E., & Bastin, C. (2016). The impact of aging on associative memory for preexisting unitized associations. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(1), 1–29. Delhaye, E., & Bastin, C. (2016). The impact of aging on associative memory for preexisting unitized associations. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(1), 1–29.
go back to reference Delhaye, E., Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Levy, D. A., & Bastin, C. (2017). Misrecollection prevents older adults from benefitting from semantic relatedness of the memoranda in associative memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(5), 1–21. Delhaye, E., Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Levy, D. A., & Bastin, C. (2017). Misrecollection prevents older adults from benefitting from semantic relatedness of the memoranda in associative memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(5), 1–21.
go back to reference Giovanello, K. S., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. (2006). The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 1859–1865.CrossRef Giovanello, K. S., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. (2006). The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 44(10), 1859–1865.CrossRef
go back to reference Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 15, 930–940.CrossRef Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1989). Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 15, 930–940.CrossRef
go back to reference *Greve, A., Van, R. M. C. W., & Donaldson, D. (2007). Investigating the functional interaction between semantic and episodic memory: Convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the role of familiarity. Neuroimage, 34(2), 801–814.CrossRef *Greve, A., Van, R. M. C. W., & Donaldson, D. (2007). Investigating the functional interaction between semantic and episodic memory: Convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the role of familiarity. Neuroimage, 34(2), 801–814.CrossRef
go back to reference Han, M., Mao, X., Kartvelishvili, N., Li, W., & Guo, C. (2018). Unitization mitigates interference by intrinsic negative emotion in familiarity and recollection of associative memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1259–1268.CrossRef Han, M., Mao, X., Kartvelishvili, N., Li, W., & Guo, C. (2018). Unitization mitigates interference by intrinsic negative emotion in familiarity and recollection of associative memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(6), 1259–1268.CrossRef
go back to reference Haskin, A. L., Yonelinas, A. P., Quamme, J. R., & Charan, R. (2008). Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron, 59(4), 547–553.CrossRef Haskin, A. L., Yonelinas, A. P., Quamme, J. R., & Charan, R. (2008). Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron, 59(4), 547–553.CrossRef
go back to reference *Hubbard, R. (2014). Unitization and semantic information. Illinois: University of Illinois. *Hubbard, R. (2014). Unitization and semantic information. Illinois: University of Illinois.
go back to reference Kamp, S. M., Bader, R., & Mecklinger, A. (2016). The effect of unitizing word pairs on recollection versusfamiliarity-based retrieval—further evidence from erps. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 12(4), 169–178.CrossRef Kamp, S. M., Bader, R., & Mecklinger, A. (2016). The effect of unitizing word pairs on recollection versusfamiliarity-based retrieval—further evidence from erps. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 12(4), 169–178.CrossRef
go back to reference *Kriukova, O., Bridger, E., & Mecklinger, A. (2013). Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Cognition, 83(1), 93–103.CrossRef *Kriukova, O., Bridger, E., & Mecklinger, A. (2013). Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence. Brain and Cognition, 83(1), 93–103.CrossRef
go back to reference Li, B., Mao, X., Wang, Y., & Guo, C. (2017). Electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection in associative recognition: contributions of perceptual and conceptual processing to unitization. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 1–12. Li, B., Mao, X., Wang, Y., & Guo, C. (2017). Electrophysiological correlates of familiarity and recollection in associative recognition: contributions of perceptual and conceptual processing to unitization. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 1–12.
go back to reference *Lyu, Y., Wang, Y., Mao, X., Li, X., & Guo, C. (2017). Semantic relationship shared between words: Influence on associative recognition supported by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 29(2), 72–78. *Lyu, Y., Wang, Y., Mao, X., Li, X., & Guo, C. (2017). Semantic relationship shared between words: Influence on associative recognition supported by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 29(2), 72–78.
go back to reference Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87(3), 252–271.CrossRef Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87(3), 252–271.CrossRef
go back to reference *Murray, & Jamie, G. (2014). Associative recognition: Exploring the contributions of recollection and familiarity. Episodic Memory: University of Stirling. *Murray, & Jamie, G. (2014). Associative recognition: Exploring the contributions of recollection and familiarity. Episodic Memory: University of Stirling.
go back to reference Opitz, B., & Cornell, S. (2006). Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: Insights from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1595–1605.CrossRef Opitz, B., & Cornell, S. (2006). Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: Insights from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1595–1605.CrossRef
go back to reference Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2015). The importance of unitization for familiarity-based learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 41(3), 881–903.CrossRef Parks, C. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2015). The importance of unitization for familiarity-based learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 41(3), 881–903.CrossRef
go back to reference Peterson, D. J., Schmidt, N. E., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2017). The role of schematic support in age-related associative deficits in short-term and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 79–97.CrossRef Peterson, D. J., Schmidt, N. E., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2017). The role of schematic support in age-related associative deficits in short-term and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 79–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Pierre, D., Patrice, C., Franck, D., Anna, L., Bowler, D. M., Gérardin, P., et al. (2017). Impact of semantic relatedness on associative memory: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 335–345. Pierre, D., Patrice, C., Franck, D., Anna, L., Bowler, D. M., Gérardin, P., et al. (2017). Impact of semantic relatedness on associative memory: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 335–345.
go back to reference *Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia, 45, 412–424.CrossRef *Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2007). Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia, 45, 412–424.CrossRef
go back to reference *Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. Neuroimage, 39, 873–884.CrossRef *Rhodes, S. M., & Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition. Neuroimage, 39, 873–884.CrossRef
go back to reference *Robey, A., & Riggins, T. (2017). Increasing relational memory in childhood with unitization strategies. Memory and Cognition., 46(1), 100–111. *Robey, A., & Riggins, T. (2017). Increasing relational memory in childhood with unitization strategies. Memory and Cognition., 46(1), 100–111.
go back to reference Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 47–69.CrossRef Rugg, M. D., Schloerscheidt, A. M., & Mark, R. E. (1998). An electrophysiological comparison of two indices of recollection. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 47–69.CrossRef
go back to reference *Shao, H., Opitz, B., Yang, J., & Weng, X. (2016). Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect. Memory, 24(4), 535–547.CrossRef *Shao, H., Opitz, B., Yang, J., & Weng, X. (2016). Recollection reduces unitised familiarity effect. Memory, 24(4), 535–547.CrossRef
go back to reference *Shao, H., & Weng, X. (2011). Unitization benefits associative recognition whereas impairs item recognition. Third international conference on multimedia information networking and security. IEEE Computer Society. *Shao, H., & Weng, X. (2011). Unitization benefits associative recognition whereas impairs item recognition. Third international conference on multimedia information networking and security. IEEE Computer Society.
go back to reference *Tibon, R., Ben-Zvi, S., & Levy, D. A. (2014a). Associative recognition processes are modulated by modality relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(8), 1785–1796.CrossRef *Tibon, R., Ben-Zvi, S., & Levy, D. A. (2014a). Associative recognition processes are modulated by modality relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(8), 1785–1796.CrossRef
go back to reference Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Scheuplein, A. L., Mecklinger, A., & Levy, D. A. (2014b). Associative recognition processes are modulated by the semantic unitizability of memoranda. Brain and Cognition, 92C(92C), 19–31.CrossRef Tibon, R., Gronau, N., Scheuplein, A. L., Mecklinger, A., & Levy, D. A. (2014b). Associative recognition processes are modulated by the semantic unitizability of memoranda. Brain and Cognition, 92C(92C), 19–31.CrossRef
go back to reference *Wang, Y., Mao, X., Li, B., Lu, B., & Guo, C. (2016). Semantic memory influences episodic retrieval by increased familiarity. NeuroReport, 27(10), 774–782.CrossRef *Wang, Y., Mao, X., Li, B., Lu, B., & Guo, C. (2016). Semantic memory influences episodic retrieval by increased familiarity. NeuroReport, 27(10), 774–782.CrossRef
go back to reference Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(6), 1341–1354.CrossRef Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(6), 1341–1354.CrossRef
go back to reference Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441–517.CrossRef Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(3), 441–517.CrossRef
go back to reference Zheng, Z., Li, J., Xiao, F., Broster, L. S., & Jiang, Y. (2015a). Electrophysiological evidence for the effects of unitization on associative recognition memory in older adults. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 121, 59–71.CrossRef Zheng, Z., Li, J., Xiao, F., Broster, L. S., & Jiang, Y. (2015a). Electrophysiological evidence for the effects of unitization on associative recognition memory in older adults. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 121, 59–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Zheng, Z., Li, J., Xiao, F., Broster, L. S., Jiang, Y., & Xi, M. (2015b). The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95(3), 355–362.CrossRef Zheng, Z., Li, J., Xiao, F., Broster, L. S., Jiang, Y., & Xi, M. (2015b). The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95(3), 355–362.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The effect of unitization on associative recognition was not moderated by the unitization–congruence between original and rearranged picture pairs (UC) for picture stimuli
Auteurs
Zejun Liu
Jun Wu
Chunyan Guo
Publicatiedatum
18-11-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01260-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Psychological Research 1/2021 Naar de uitgave