Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Article

The coding of repetitions and alternations in action sequences: spatial or relational?

Auteurs: Peter Wühr, Herbert Heuer

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We used variants of the Simon task to investigate whether repetitions and alternations in short keypress sequences are represented by spatial or relational codes. With spatial coding, either absolute or relative location would be used for coding the second response in a sequence. With relational coding, the second response would be coded in terms of a non-spatial relation to the first one (e.g., left response—same response, for a repetition). In three experiments with different imperative stimuli, we compared Simon effects across three experimental conditions, a single-response condition, a response-repetition condition (each stimulus required two keypresses on the same side, e.g., left–left), and a response-alternation condition (each stimulus required a keypress on each side, e.g., left–right). When compared to the single-response condition, spatial coding of the second response should modulate the Simon effect (i.e., response conflict) in selecting the first response because spatial coding of the second response produces additional dimensional overlap of stimulus and the second-response code. We observed Simon effects in the response times of first responses in each condition, and they increased in the response-alternation condition, but not in the response-repetition condition. The findings suggest relational coding of response repetitions, and spatial coding of response alternations.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 603–623.CrossRef Abrahamse, E. L., Jiménez, L., Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Representing serial action and perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 603–623.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMed Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMed
go back to reference Bock, O., & Eckmiller, R. (1986). Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: Evidence for amplitude rather than position control. Experimental Brain Research, 62, 451–458.CrossRefPubMed Bock, O., & Eckmiller, R. (1986). Goal-directed arm movements in absence of visual guidance: Evidence for amplitude rather than position control. Experimental Brain Research, 62, 451–458.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cooke, J. D., & Diggles, V. A. (1984). Rapid error correction during human arm movements: Evidence for central monitoring. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 348–363.CrossRefPubMed Cooke, J. D., & Diggles, V. A. (1984). Rapid error correction during human arm movements: Evidence for central monitoring. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 348–363.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Danev, S. G., De Winter, C. R., & Wartna, G. F. (1971). On the relation between reaction and motor time in a choice reaction task. Acta Psychologica, 35, 188–197.CrossRef Danev, S. G., De Winter, C. R., & Wartna, G. F. (1971). On the relation between reaction and motor time in a choice reaction task. Acta Psychologica, 35, 188–197.CrossRef
go back to reference Heuer, H. (1982). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 35–47.CrossRef Heuer, H. (1982). Binary choice reaction time as a criterion of motor equivalence. Acta Psychologica, 50, 35–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Heuer, H., & Sangals, J. (1998). Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 224–236.CrossRefPubMed Heuer, H., & Sangals, J. (1998). Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 224–236.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Higgins, J. R., & Angle, R. W. (1970). Correction of tracking errors without sensory feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 412–416.CrossRefPubMed Higgins, J. R., & Angle, R. W. (1970). Correction of tracking errors without sensory feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 412–416.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., Sakai, K., & Nakahara, H. (2002). Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 217–222.CrossRefPubMed Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., Sakai, K., & Nakahara, H. (2002). Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 217–222.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Holroyd, C. B., Yeung, N., Coles, M. G. H., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 163–191.CrossRef Holroyd, C. B., Yeung, N., Coles, M. G. H., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 163–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261–268.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1995). Conflict versus misguided search as explanations of S–R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 89, 37–51.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1995). Conflict versus misguided search as explanations of S–R correspondence effects. Acta Psychologica, 89, 37–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1997). The impact of irrelevant spatial information on the programming of response sequences. Unpublished Research Paper 8/1997. Munich, Germany: Max-Planck Institute for Psychological Research. Hommel, B. (1997). The impact of irrelevant spatial information on the programming of response sequences. Unpublished Research Paper 8/1997. Munich, Germany: Max-Planck Institute for Psychological Research.
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Toward an action—concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Hommel, B. (1998). Toward an action—concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Inhoff, A. W., Rosenbaum, D. A., Gordon, A. M., & Campbell, J. A. (1984). Stimulus–response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 724–733. Inhoff, A. W., Rosenbaum, D. A., Gordon, A. M., & Campbell, J. A. (1984). Stimulus–response compatibility and motor programming of manual response sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 724–733.
go back to reference Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.CrossRefPubMed Klapp, S. T., & Wyatt, E. P. (1976). Motor programming within a sequence of responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 19–26.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2001). Task-set reconfiguration with binary and three-valued task dimensions. Psychological Research, 65, 192–201.CrossRefPubMed Kleinsorge, T., Heuer, H., & Schmidtke, V. (2001). Task-set reconfiguration with binary and three-valued task dimensions. Psychological Research, 65, 192–201.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior; the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–146). Oxford England: Wiley. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior; the Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–146). Oxford England: Wiley.
go back to reference Lu, C.-W., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef Lu, C.-W., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 72–86). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 72–86). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Ostry, D. J. (1983). Determinants of interkey times in typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 225–246). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef Ostry, D. J. (1983). Determinants of interkey times in typing. In W. E. Cooper (Ed.), Cognitive aspects of skilled typewriting (pp. 225–246). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Povel, D.-J., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107–123.CrossRefPubMed Povel, D.-J., & Collard, R. (1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologica, 52, 107–123.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rhodes, B. J., Bullock, D., Verwey, W. B., Averbeck, B. B., & Page, M. P. A. (2004). Learning and production of movement sequences: Behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives. Human Movement Science, 23, 699–746.CrossRefPubMed Rhodes, B. J., Bullock, D., Verwey, W. B., Averbeck, B. B., & Page, M. P. A. (2004). Learning and production of movement sequences: Behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives. Human Movement Science, 23, 699–746.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, R. K. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In: W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention & performance (Vol. XIX, pp. 494–519). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ridderinkhof, R. K. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In: W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention & performance (Vol. XIX, pp. 494–519). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.CrossRef Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444–474.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Human motor control (2nd ed.). Amsterdam (NL): Academic Press. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2009). Human motor control (2nd ed.). Amsterdam (NL): Academic Press.
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munro, E. M. (1987). Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences. Tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 193–203.PubMed Rosenbaum, D. A., Hindorff, V., & Munro, E. M. (1987). Scheduling and programming of rapid finger sequences. Tests and elaborations of the hierarchical editor model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 193–203.PubMed
go back to reference Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.PubMed Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B., & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86–102.PubMed
go back to reference Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 229–242.CrossRefPubMed Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K., & Hikosaka, O. (2003). Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 229–242.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefPubMed Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.CrossRefPubMed Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparison of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparison of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Stoffer, T. H., & Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S–R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in Stimulus–Response compatibility (pp. 181–208). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Stoffer, T. H., & Umiltà, C. (1997). Spatial stimulus coding and the focus of attention in S–R compatibility and the Simon effect. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in Stimulus–Response compatibility (pp. 181–208). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef
go back to reference Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648–670.PubMed Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648–670.PubMed
go back to reference Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S–R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 457–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S–R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 457–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaskowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241–255.CrossRef Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., Jaskowski, P., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task, and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 241–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for a multi-stage model of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1693–1708. Verwey, W. B. (1999). Evidence for a multi-stage model of practice in a sequential movement task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1693–1708.
go back to reference Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2005). Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 69, 242–251.CrossRefPubMed Verwey, W. B., & Clegg, B. A. (2005). Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 69, 242–251.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Verwey, W. B., & Eikelboom, T. (2003). Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence-production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 171–181.CrossRefPubMed Verwey, W. B., & Eikelboom, T. (2003). Evidence for lasting sequence segmentation in the discrete sequence-production task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 171–181.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64–70.CrossRefPubMed Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64–70.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vindras, P., & Viviani, P. (2005). Planning short pointing sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 141–153.CrossRefPubMed Vindras, P., & Viviani, P. (2005). Planning short pointing sequences. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 141–153.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wallace, R. J. (1971). S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.CrossRefPubMed Wallace, R. J. (1971). S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus–response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464.PubMed Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus–response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453–464.PubMed
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Biebl, R. (2011). The role of working memory in spatial S–R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 442–454.PubMed Wühr, P., & Biebl, R. (2011). The role of working memory in spatial S–R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 442–454.PubMed
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Kunde, W. (2006). Spatial correspondence between onsets and offsets of stimuli and responses. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 359–377.CrossRef Wühr, P., & Kunde, W. (2006). Spatial correspondence between onsets and offsets of stimuli and responses. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 359–377.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The coding of repetitions and alternations in action sequences: spatial or relational?
Auteurs
Peter Wühr
Herbert Heuer
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0579-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2015

Psychological Research 3/2015 Naar de uitgave