Skip to main content
Log in

Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor sequence learning is a process whereby a series of elementary movements is re-coded into an efficient representation for the entire sequence. Here we show that human subjects learn a visuomotor sequence by spontaneously chunking the elementary movements, while each chunk acts as a single memory unit. The subjects learned to press a sequence of 10 sets of two buttons through trial and error. By examining the temporal patterns with which subjects performed a visuomotor sequence, we found that the subjects performed the 10 sets as several clusters of sets, which were separated by long time gaps. While the overall performance time decreased by repeating the same sequence, the clusters became clearer and more consistent. The cluster pattern was uncorrelated with the distance of hand movements and was different across subjects who learned the same sequence. We then split a learned sequence into three segments, while preserving or destroying the clusters in the learned sequence, and shuffled the segments. The performance on the shuffled sequence was more accurate and quicker when the clusters in the original sequence were preserved than when they were destroyed. The results suggest that each cluster is processed as a single memory unit, a chunk, and is necessary for efficient sequence processing. A learned visuomotor sequence is hierarchically represented as chunks that contain several elementary movements. We also found that the temporal patterns of sequence performance transferred from the nondominant to dominant hand, but not vice versa. This may suggest a role of the dominant hemisphere in storage of learned chunks. Together with our previous unit-recording and imaging studies that used the same learning paradigm, we predict specific roles of the dominant parietal area, basal ganglia, and presupplementary motor area in the chunking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1. A
Fig. 2A-D.
Fig. 3A-D.
Fig. 4A, B.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6A-C.
Fig. 7A, B.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bapi RS, Doya K, Harner AM (2000) Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Exp Brain Res 132:149–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catalan MJ, Honda M, Weeks RA, Cohen LG, Hallett M (1998) The functional neuroanatomy of simple and complex sequential finger movements: a PET study. Brain 121:253–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Ivry RI, Keele SW (1990) Attention and structure in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 16:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran T, Keele SW (1993) Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 19:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallal NL, Meck WH (1990) Hierarchical structures: chunking by food type facilitates spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 16:69–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA, Chase WG, Faloon S (1980) Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208:1181–1182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fountain SB (1990) Rule abstraction, item memory, and chunking in rat serial-pattern tracking. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 16:96–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon PC, Meyer DE (1984) Perceptual-motor processing of phonetic features in speech. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:153–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graybiel AM (1998) The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiol Learn Mem 70:119–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington DL, Haaland KY (1991a) Hemispheric specialisation for motor sequencing: abnormalities in levels of programming. Neuropsychologia 29:147–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington DL, Haaland KY (1991b) Sequencing in Parkinson's disease. Abnormalities in programming and controlling movement. Brain 114:99–115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington DL, Haaland KY (1992) Motor sequencing with left hemisphere damage: are some cognitive deficits specific to limb apraxia? Brain 115:857–874

    Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Rand MK, Miyachi S, Miyashita K (1995) Learning of sequential movements in the monkey: process of learning and retention of memory. J Neurophysiol 74: 1652–1661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Sakai K, Miyauchi S, Takino R, Sasaki Y, Putz B (1996) Activation of human presupplementary motor area in learning of sequential procedures: a functional MRI study. J Neurophysiol 76:617–621

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Nakahara H, Rand MK, Sakai K, Lu X, Nakamura K, Miyachi S, Doya K (1999a) Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends Neurosci 22:464–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Sakai K, Nakahara H, Lu X, Miyachi S, Nakamura K, Rand MK (1999b) Neural mechanisms for learning of sequential procedures. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The new cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 553–572

  • Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H (2002a) Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Rand MK, Nakamura K, Miyachi S, Kitaguchi K, Sakai K, Lu X, Shimo Y (2002b) Long-term retention of motor skill in macaque monkeys and humans. Exp Brain Res 147:494–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jog MS, Kubota Y, Connolly CI, Hillegaart V, Graybiel AM (1999) Building neural representations of habits. Science 286:1745–1749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW, Jennings PJ (1992) Attention in the representation of sequence: experiment and theory. Hum Mov Sci 11:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley SW, Sakai K, Rushworth MFS (2002) The pre-SMA and sequential organization of actions: a TMS study. Abstr Soc Neurosci 163.8

  • Knowlton BJ, Mangels JA, Squire LR (1996) A neostriatal habit learning system in humans. Science 273:1399–1402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch I, Hoffmann J (2000) Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychol Res 63:22–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S (1998) Role of monkey cerebellar nuclei in skill for sequential movement. J Neurophysiol 79:2245–2254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macuda T, Roberts WA (1995) Further evidence for hierarchical chunking in rat spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 21:20–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1956) The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyachi S, Hikosaka O, Miyashita K, Karadi Z, Rand MK (1997) Differential roles of monkey striatum in learning of sequential hand movement. Exp Brain Res 115:1-5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara H, Doya K, Hikosaka O (2001) Parallel cortico-basal ganglia mechanisms for acquisition and execution of visuomotor sequences: a computational approach. J Cognit Neurosci 13:626–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura K, Sakai K, Hikosaka O (1998) Neuronal activity in medial frontal cortex during learning of sequential procedures. J Neurophysiol 80:2671–2687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura K, Sakai K, Hikosaka O (1999) Effects of local inactivation of monkey medial frontal cortex in learning of sequential procedures. J Neurophysiol 82:1063–1068

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognit Psychol 19:1-32

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Povel DJ, Collard R (1982) Structural factors in patterned finger tapping. Acta Psychologia 52:107–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MK, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S, Lu X, Miyashita K (1998) Characteristics of a long-term procedural skill in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 118:293–297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MK, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S, Lu X, Nakamura K, Kitaguchi K, Shimo Y (2000) Characteristics of sequential movements during early learning period in monkeys. Exp Brain Res, 131:293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Restle F, Burnside BL (1972) Tracking of serial patterns. J Exp Psychol 95:299–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rushworth MFS, Nixon PD, Wade DT, Renowden S, Passingham RE (1998) The left hemisphere and the selection of learned actions. Neuropsychologia 36:11–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Kenny SB, Derr MA (1983) Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9:86–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sadato N, Campbell G, Ibanez V, Deiber M, Hallett M (1996) Complexity affects regional cerebral blood flow change during sequential finger movements. J Neurosci 16:2691–2700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai K, Hikosaka O, Miyauchi S, Takino R, Sasaki Y, Putz B (1998) Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning. J Neurosci 18:1827–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai K, Hikosaka O, Miyauchi S, Sasaki Y, Fujimaki N, Putz B (1999) Presupplementary motor area activation during sequence learning reflects visuomotor association. J Neurosci 19: RC1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shima K, Mushiake H, Saito N, Tanji J (1996) Role for cells in the presupplementary motor area in updating motor plans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8694–8698

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler MA (1989) On learning complex procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 15:1061–1069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler MA (1993) Implicit serial learning: questions inspired by Hebb (1961) Mem Cognit 21:819–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (1987) Chunking by a pigeon in a serial learning task. Nature 325:149–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS (1991) Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon. I. Basic evidence. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:81–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS, Chen S (1991a) Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon. II. Integrity of a chunk on a new list. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:94–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terrace HS, Chen S (1991b) Chunking during serial learning by a pigeon. III. What are the necessary conditions for establishing a chunk? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 17:107–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuyuki Sakai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakai, K., Kitaguchi, K. & Hikosaka, O. Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Exp Brain Res 152, 229–242 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1548-8

Keywords

Navigation