Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
While much prior research has documented the negative associations between aggression, peer relationships, and social skills, other research has begun to examine whether forms of aggression also may be associated with prosocial skills and increased social status. However, few studies have examined these associations within diverse samples of elementary aged youth. The current study examined the associations between aggression, popularity, social preference, and leadership among 227 urban, ethnic minority (74 % African American, 9 % bi-racial including African American, 12 % other ethnic minorities, and 5 % European American) elementary school youth (average age 9.5 years, 48.5 % female). Results indicated that in an urban, high risk environment, displaying aggressive behaviors was associated with increased perceived popularity, decreased social preference, and, in some cases, increased perceived leadership. The results also suggested gender differences in the association between the forms of aggression (i.e. relational and overt) and popularity. The current study underscores the importance of examining youth leadership along with forms of aggression and social status among urban minority youth. Implications for future research and aggression prevention programming are highlighted.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Clifts, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 21(1), 166–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x. PubMedCrossRef
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1983). Dimensions and Types of social status: a cross-age perspective: Correction. Developmental Psychology, 19(2). doi: 10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.11.
Farmer, T. W., Estell, D. B., Bishop, J. L., O’Neal, K. K., & Cairns, B. D. (2003). Rejected bullies or popular leaders? The social relations of aggressive subtypes of rural African American early adolescents [Article]. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 992–1004. doi: 10.1037/0012-1618.104.22.1682. PubMedCrossRef
Farrell, A. D., Erwin, E. H., Allison, K. W., Meyer, A., Sullivan, T., Camou, S., et al. (2007). Problematic situations in the lives of urban African American middle school students: A qualitative study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 413–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00528.x. CrossRef
Fontaine, N., Carbonneau, R., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., & Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Research review: A critical review of studies on the developmental trajectories of antisocial behavior in females. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 363–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01949.x. PubMedCrossRef
Garandeau, C. F., Wilson, T., & Rodkin, P. C. (2010). The popularity of elementary school bullies in gender and racial context. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 119–136). New York, NY, USA: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1990). The role of poor peer relationships in the development of disorder. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 274–305). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ladd, G. W. (2005). Children's peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Leff, S. S. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Considerations and future directions. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 406–412.
Leff, S. S., Angelucci, J., Goldstein, A. B., Cardaciotto, L., Paskewich, B., & Grossman, M. B. (2007). Using a participatory action research model to create a school-based intervention program for relationally aggressive girls—The Friend to Friend Program. In J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 199–218). New York, NY: Haworth Press.
Leff, S. S., Freedman, M. A., MacEvoy, J. P., & Power, T. J. (2011). Considerations when measuring outcomes to assess for the effectiveness of bullying- and aggression-prevention programs in the schools. In D. L. Espelage & S. S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in North American Schools (2nd ed., pp. 205–223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Leff, S. S., Gullan, R. L., Paskewich, B. S., Abdul-Kabir, S., Jawad, A. F., Grossman, M., et al. (2009). An initial evaluation of a culturally adapted social problem-solving and relational aggression prevention program for urban African-American relationally aggressive girls. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 37(4), 260–274. doi: 10.1080/10852350903196274. CrossRef
Leff, S. S., Waasdorp, T. E., & Crick, N. R. (2010a). A review of existing relational aggression programs: Strengths, limitations, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 508–535. PubMed
Leff, S. S., Waasdorp, T. E., Paskewich, B., Gullan, R. L., Jawad, A. F., MacEvoy, J. P., et al. (2010b). The preventing relational aggression in schools everyday program: A preliminary evaluation of acceptability and impact. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 569–587. PubMed
Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: structure and correlates [Article]. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Lawrence Erlbaum), 6(4), 581–603.
Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49–74. CrossRef
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In K. H. Rubin & D. Pepler (Eds.), Development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125. CrossRef
Robertson, D. L., Farmer, T. W., Fraser, M. W., Day, S. H., Duncan, T., Crowther, A., et al. (2010). Interpersonal competence configurations and peer relations in early elementary classrooms: Perceived popular and unpopular aggressive subtypes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(1), 73–87. doi: 10.1177/0165025409345074. CrossRef
Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 27–53). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2007). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. In J. E. Zins, M. J. Elias, & C. A. Maher (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 317–337). New York, NY, USA: Haworth Press.
van de Schoot, R., van der Velden, F., Boom, J., & Brugman, D. (2010). Can at-risk young adolescents be popular and anti-social? Sociometric status groups, anti-social behaviour, gender and ethnic background. Journal of Adolescence, 33(5), 583–592. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.004. PubMedCrossRef
- The Association Between Forms of Aggression, Leadership, and Social Status Among Urban Youth
Tracy Evian Waasdorp
Courtney N. Baker
Brooke S. Paskewich
Stephen S. Leff
- Springer US