Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2014

Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach

Auteurs: Ted C. T. Fong, Rainbow T. H. Ho

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

Measurement invariance is an important attribute for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Most of the confirmatory factor analysis studies on the HADS adopt the classical maximum likelihood approach. The restrictive assumptions of exact-zero cross-loadings and residual correlations in the classical approach can lead to inadequate model fit and biased parameter estimates. The present study adopted both the classical approach and the alternative Bayesian approach to examine the measurement and structural invariance of the HADS across gender.

Methods

A Chinese sample of 326 males and 427 females was used to examine the two-factor model of the HADS across gender. Configural and scalar invariance of the HADS were evaluated using the classical approach with the robust-weighted least-square estimator and the Bayesian approach with zero-mean, small-variance informative priors to cross-loadings and residual correlations.

Results

Acceptable and excellent model fits were found for the two-factor model under the classical and Bayesian approaches, respectively. The two-factor model displayed scalar invariance across gender using both approaches. In terms of structural invariance, females showed a significantly higher mean in the anxiety factor than males under both approaches.

Conclusion

The HADS demonstrated measurement invariance across gender and appears to be a well-developed instrument for assessment of anxiety and depression. The Bayesian approach is an alternative and flexible tool that could be used in future invariance studies.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.PubMedCrossRef Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.​1177/​109442810031002.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hunt-Shanks, T., Blanchard, C., Reid, R., Fortier, M., & Cappelli, M. (2010). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cardiac patients: Addressing factor structure and gender invariance. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 97–114. doi:10.1348/135910709x432745.PubMedCrossRef Hunt-Shanks, T., Blanchard, C., Reid, R., Fortier, M., & Cappelli, M. (2010). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cardiac patients: Addressing factor structure and gender invariance. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 97–114. doi:10.​1348/​135910709x432745​.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gale, C. R., Allerhand, M., Sayer, A. A., Cooper, C., Dennison, E. M., Starr, J. M., et al. (2010). The structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: The HALCyon program. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(4), 559–571. doi:10.1017/s1041610210000256.PubMedCrossRef Gale, C. R., Allerhand, M., Sayer, A. A., Cooper, C., Dennison, E. M., Starr, J. M., et al. (2010). The structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: The HALCyon program. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(4), 559–571. doi:10.​1017/​s104161021000025​6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Annunziata, M. A., Muzzatti, B., & Altoe, G. (2011). Defining Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) structure by confirmatory factor analysis: A contribution to validation for oncological settings. Annals of Oncology, 22(10), 2330–2333. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq750.PubMedCrossRef Annunziata, M. A., Muzzatti, B., & Altoe, G. (2011). Defining Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) structure by confirmatory factor analysis: A contribution to validation for oncological settings. Annals of Oncology, 22(10), 2330–2333. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdq750.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules *: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851–858. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023.CrossRef Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules *: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 851–858. doi:10.​1016/​j.​paid.​2006.​09.​023.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 737–757. doi:10.1177/0013164404264853.CrossRef Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi square difference and z tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 737–757. doi:10.​1177/​0013164404264853​.CrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. doi:10.1037/a0026802.PubMedCrossRef Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. doi:10.​1037/​a0026802.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
go back to reference Fong, T. C. T., & Ho, R. T. H. (2013). Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Quality of Life Research, 1–7. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0429-2. Fong, T. C. T., & Ho, R. T. H. (2013). Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Quality of Life Research, 1–7. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-013-0429-2.
17.
go back to reference Leung, C. M., Wing, Y. K., Kwong, P. K., Lo, A., & Shum, K. (1999). Validation of the Chinese-Cantonese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100(6), 456–461.PubMedCrossRef Leung, C. M., Wing, Y. K., Kwong, P. K., Lo, A., & Shum, K. (1999). Validation of the Chinese-Cantonese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and comparison with the Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100(6), 456–461.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
20.
go back to reference Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.​1080/​1070551990954011​8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (Technical report). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (Technical report). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
22.
go back to reference Lee, S. Y., & Song, X. Y. (2012). Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling: With applications in the medical and behavioral sciences. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Lee, S. Y., & Song, X. Y. (2012). Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling: With applications in the medical and behavioral sciences. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
23.
go back to reference Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
25.
go back to reference Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes, 17, 1–48. Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes, 17, 1–48.
26.
27.
go back to reference Rindskopf, D. (2012). Next steps in Bayesian structural equation models: Comments on, variations of, and extensions to Muthen and Asparouhov (2012). Psychological Methods, 17(3), 336–339. doi:10.1037/a0027130.PubMedCrossRef Rindskopf, D. (2012). Next steps in Bayesian structural equation models: Comments on, variations of, and extensions to Muthen and Asparouhov (2012). Psychological Methods, 17(3), 336–339. doi:10.​1037/​a0027130.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): Mastering a new method. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 346–353. doi:10.1037/a0029214.CrossRef Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): Mastering a new method. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 346–353. doi:10.​1037/​a0029214.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach
Auteurs
Ted C. T. Fong
Rainbow T. H. Ho
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0594-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2014

Quality of Life Research 5/2014 Naar de uitgave