Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Measurement invariance is an important attribute for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Most of the confirmatory factor analysis studies on the HADS adopt the classical maximum likelihood approach. The restrictive assumptions of exact-zero cross-loadings and residual correlations in the classical approach can lead to inadequate model fit and biased parameter estimates. The present study adopted both the classical approach and the alternative Bayesian approach to examine the measurement and structural invariance of the HADS across gender.
A Chinese sample of 326 males and 427 females was used to examine the two-factor model of the HADS across gender. Configural and scalar invariance of the HADS were evaluated using the classical approach with the robust-weighted least-square estimator and the Bayesian approach with zero-mean, small-variance informative priors to cross-loadings and residual correlations.
Acceptable and excellent model fits were found for the two-factor model under the classical and Bayesian approaches, respectively. The two-factor model displayed scalar invariance across gender using both approaches. In terms of structural invariance, females showed a significantly higher mean in the anxiety factor than males under both approaches.
The HADS demonstrated measurement invariance across gender and appears to be a well-developed instrument for assessment of anxiety and depression. The Bayesian approach is an alternative and flexible tool that could be used in future invariance studies.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Hunt-Shanks, T., Blanchard, C., Reid, R., Fortier, M., & Cappelli, M. (2010). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cardiac patients: Addressing factor structure and gender invariance. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 97–114. doi: 10.1348/135910709x432745. PubMedCrossRef
Gale, C. R., Allerhand, M., Sayer, A. A., Cooper, C., Dennison, E. M., Starr, J. M., et al. (2010). The structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in four cohorts of community-based, healthy older people: The HALCyon program. International Psychogeriatrics, 22(4), 559–571. doi: 10.1017/s1041610210000256. PubMedCrossRef
Kolenikov, S. (2011). Biases of parameter estimates in misspecified structural equation models. Sociological methodology, 41, 119–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01236.x.
Kaplan, D., & Depaoli, S. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Fong, T. C. T., & Ho, R. T. H. (2013). Factor analyses of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach. Quality of Life Research, 1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0429-2.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (Technical report). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Lee, S. Y., & Song, X. Y. (2012). Basic and advanced Bayesian structural equation modeling: With applications in the medical and behavioral sciences. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Muthen, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes, 17, 1–48.
- Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach
Ted C. T. Fong
Rainbow T. H. Ho
- Springer International Publishing