Structural equation modeling made difficult

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.021Get rights and content

Abstract

In his target article (Barrett, 2007), Paul Barrett argues persuasively against continued use of approximate fit indices in SEM in relation to current thresholds for acceptable fit, given recent research that has cast doubt on the generality of these thresholds. He proposes greater use of the chi-square test of exact fit as an alternative, except in special circumstances. Apart from the problems with current fit thresholds, a further problem with fit indices is the lack of any direct relationship between the value of an index and the degree of misspecification in the model. In response to these problems, a procedure for using fit indices in the absence of thresholds is outlined here. The approach requires the investigator to specify acceptable levels of misspecification a priori, and then uses this information in a simulation procedure to develop a decision for retaining versus rejecting the model. It is argued that this approach is preferable to exclusive reliance on the chi-square test of exact fit. Comments on other points made in the target article are given.

References (12)

  • P. Barrett

    Structural equation modeling: Adjusting model fit

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2007)
  • A. Beauducel et al.

    Simulation study on fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis based on data with slightly distorted simple structure

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2005)
  • L. Breiman

    Statistical modeling: the two cultures

    Statistical Science

    (2001)
  • X. Fan et al.

    Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecified structural or measurement model components: rationale of the two-index strategy revisited

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2005)
  • Hu Li-tze et al.

    Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (1999)
  • R.C. MacCallum et al.

    Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling

    Psychological Methods

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text