Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003Get rights and content

Abstract

A review of efforts to assess the invariance of measurement instruments across different respondent groups using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is provided for the years since the Vandenberg and Lance [Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.] review. Investigators are more frequently reporting tests of scalar invariance and tests for differences in latent factor means and partial invariance. Efforts have been made to assess, the impact of the choice of a referent indicator in multi-group studies, the appropriateness of forming partials as indicators of a latent construct, the degree of convergence of item response theory and CFA analyses of measurement differences across groups, and the implications of findings of invariance. In this context, a demonstration of the impact of partial invariance on estimated group differences in reliability and means is provided and discussed.

Section snippets

Invariance defined

A measure is invariant when members of different populations who have the same standing on the construct being measured receive the same observed score on the test. A test violates invariance when two individuals from different populations who are identical on the construct score differently on it. In the CFA model, a series of tests are used to establish that there is invariance across populations. The sequence is outlined in Vandenberg and Lance (2000) and a variety of other sources. Byrne

Assessments of factor invariance

To identify articles that used CFA in assessing factor invariance, we did a search of papers published since 2000 that used the term “measurement invariance.” This produced approximately 88 papers. Of these, 75 conducted empirical analyses of measurement invariance using CFA methods. The remainder was discussions or critiques of the CFA method (e.g., Borsboom, 2006). Each of the empirical articles were read to determine the types of invariance considered, the content area addressed by the

Continued development of methods for the assessment of measurement invariance

Because it is relatively rare that a researcher finds a measure that is invariant across all sets of parameters, it is not surprising that many more are presenting models that include partial invariance across participant groups in one or more sets of parameters. Researchers have begun to evaluate this practice and the extent to which allowing some parameters to vary across groups affects subsequent tests of parameters. Millsap and Kwok (2004) examined the impact of partial invariance on the

Lack of measurement equivalence and corresponding differences in reliability and mean differences

The data set for this illustration is based on the responses of 680 African-American and 1522 Caucasian college students to fifteen items from the short form of the IPIP (Goldberg, 1999). The items, contained in Table 2 are from measures of Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Emotional Stability. Only five items were taken from each scale to keep our illustration simple. Variance–covariance matrices for the two groups were used as input to LISREL 8.72 and are the subject of the analyses

Conclusions

Our review of studies conducted since 2000 that have assessed measurement invariance suggests that examinations of scalar invariance and factor mean differences are much more frequent than they were in the literature reviewed by Vandenberg and Lance (2000). All investigators estimate configural and metric invariance, though assessments of configural invariance often seem relatively cursory. Few investigators test the significance of the difference of the variance–covariance matrices. It is also

References (105)

  • MotlR.W. et al.

    Factorial validity and invariance of questionnaires measuring social–cognitive determinants of physical activity among adolescent girls

    Preventive Medicine

    (2000)
  • ReeveC.L. et al.

    The psychometric paradox of practice effects due to retesting: Measurement invariance and stable ability estimates in the face of observed score changes

    Intelligence

    (2005)
  • ScholdererJ. et al.

    Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe

    Appetite

    (2004)
  • SinL.Y.M. et al.

    Relationship marketing orientation: Scale development and cross-cultural validation

    Journal of Business Research

    (2005)
  • UeltschyL.C. et al.

    Cross-cultural invariance of measures of satisfaction and service quality

    Journal of Business Research

    (2004)
  • WichertsJ.M. et al.

    Are intelligence tests measurement invariant over time? Investigating the nature of the Flynn effect

    Intelligence

    (2004)
  • AndersonN. et al.

    A construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2006)
  • BandalosD.J. et al.

    Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling

  • BentlerP.M.

    Comparative fit indexes in structural models

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1990)
  • BorsboomD.

    When does measurement invariance matter?

    Medical Care

    (2006)
  • BowdenS.C. et al.

    Age-related invariance of abilities measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III

    Psychological Assessment

    (2006)
  • BurnsG.L. et al.

    Measurement and structural invariance of parent ratings of ADHD and ODD symptoms across gender for American and Malaysian children

    Psychological Assessment

    (2006)
  • ByrneB.M. et al.

    The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order factor structure: A walk through the process

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2006)
  • ByrneB.M. et al.

    The issue of measurement invariance revisited

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2003)
  • CervellonM. et al.

    Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of affective and cognitive components of attitude

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2002)
  • ChanD.

    Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1998)
  • ChengC.H.K. et al.

    Age and gender invariance of self-concept factor structure: An investigation of a newly developed Chinese self-concept instrument

    International Journal of Psychology

    (2000)
  • ChenF.F. et al.

    Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2005)
  • ChenY. et al.

    Attitude toward and propensity to engage in unethical behavior: Measurement invariance across major among university students

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2006)
  • CheungG.W. et al.

    Assessing extreme and acquiesence response sets in cross-cultural research using SEM

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2000)
  • CheungG.W. et al.

    Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2002)
  • ColeM.S. et al.

    The measurement equivalence of web-based and paper-and-pencil measures of transformational leadership: A multinational test

    Organizational Research Methods

    (2006)
  • CrockettL.J. et al.

    Measurement invariance of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale for Latino and Anglo adolescents: A national study

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2005)
  • De FriasC.M. et al.

    Confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance of the Memory Compensation Questionnaire

    Psychological Assessment

    (2005)
  • Del BarrioV. et al.

    Factor structure invariance in the children's Big Five questionnaire

    European Journal of Psychological Assessment

    (2006)
  • DierdorffE.C. et al.

    Group differences and measurement equivalence: Implications for command climate survey research and practice

    Military Psychology

    (2006)
  • DollW.J. et al.

    The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: A multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument

    Journal of Management Information Systems

    (2004)
  • DuL. et al.

    Measurement invariance across gender and major: The love of money among university students in People's Republic of China

    Journal of Business Ethics

    (2005)
  • DurvasulaS. et al.

    Does vanity describe other cultures? A cross-cultural examination of the vanity scale

    Journal of Consumer Affairs

    (2001)
  • EidM. et al.

    Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2003)
  • FeldtT. et al.

    Structural invariance and stability of sense of coherence: A longitudinal analysis of two groups with different employment experiences

    Work and Stress

    (2005)
  • FrenchB.F. et al.

    Confirmatory factor-analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2006)
  • FrenzelA.C. et al.

    Achievement emotions in Germany and China: A cross-cultural validation of the Academic Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

    (2007)
  • GaudreauP. et al.

    Positive and negative affective states in a performance-related setting

    European Journal of Psychological Assessment

    (2006)
  • GoldbergL.R.

    A broad-bandwidth public-domain personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models

  • GregorichS.E.

    Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory analysis framework

    Medical Care

    (2006)
  • GrouzetF.M.E. et al.

    Longitudinal cross-gender factorial invariance of the academic motivation scale

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (2006)
  • GuppyA. et al.

    The psychometric properties of the short version of the Cybernetic Coping Scale: A multigroup CFA across four samples

    Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

    (2004)
  • HollandP.W. et al.

    Differential item functioning

    (1993)
  • HornJ.L. et al.

    A practical and theoretical guide in measurement invariance in aging research

    Experimental Aging Research

    (1992)
  • Cited by (481)

    • Values and pro-environmental behavior: What is the role of trust?

      2024, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Robert Vandenberg and Eugene Stone-Romero on an earlier version of this paper.

    View full text