Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2014 | Brief Communication

Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers

Auteurs: G. J. Stukenborg, L. Blackhall, J. Harrison, J. S. Barclay, P. Dillon, M. A. Davis, M. Mallory, P. Read

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the feasibility of collecting patient-reported outcomes data with wireless touch screen tablet computers in the adult oncology palliative care setting.

Methods

Patients were provided with tablet computers during scheduled clinic visits and answered online queries about their experience over the past week in the health domains of anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, instrumental social support, sleep impairment, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dyspnea, neuropathy, and spiritual values.

Results

Content analysis of patient interviews indicates that wireless touch screen tablet computers are a feasible approach for collecting patient-reported outcome measures by palliative care cancer patients presenting in clinic. Most patients indicated that the questionnaire was easy to answer. However, all but one patient requested some form of assistance, and many reported difficulties attributable to a lack of familiarity with the device, interpretation of certain questions, and wireless connectivity-related issues.

Conclusions

This feasibility study demonstrates that tablet computers have the potential to efficiently and reliably collect patient-reported health status measures among palliative care cancer patients presenting in clinics. The use of these devices may lead to substantial improvements by making patient-reported outcomes available for clinical decision-making.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4249–4255.PubMedCrossRef Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4249–4255.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hawryluck, L. (2004). People at the end of life are a vulnerable research population. Clinical Oncology (R Coll Radiol), 16(3), 225–226.CrossRef Hawryluck, L. (2004). People at the end of life are a vulnerable research population. Clinical Oncology (R Coll Radiol), 16(3), 225–226.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hartmann, B., Benson, M., Junger, A., et al. (2004). Computer keyboard and mouse as a reservoir of pathogens in an intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 18(1), 7–12.PubMedCrossRef Hartmann, B., Benson, M., Junger, A., et al. (2004). Computer keyboard and mouse as a reservoir of pathogens in an intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 18(1), 7–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gershon, R., Rothrock, N. E., Hanrahan, R. T., Jansky, L. J., Harniss, M., & Riley, W. (2010). The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 677–685.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gershon, R., Rothrock, N. E., Hanrahan, R. T., Jansky, L. J., Harniss, M., & Riley, W. (2010). The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center. Quality of Life Research, 19(5), 677–685.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., Watson, P., (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2(16):iii-ix, 1–274. Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., Watson, P., (1998). Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 2(16):iii-ix, 1–274.
7.
go back to reference Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.PubMedCrossRef Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917.PubMedCrossRef Takeuchi, E. E., Keding, A., Awad, N., et al. (2011). Impact of patient-reported outcomes in oncology: A longitudinal analysis of patient-physician communication. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(21), 2910–2917.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51(8 Suppl 3), S73–S79.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51(8 Suppl 3), S73–S79.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12–S21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef DeWalt, D. A., Rothrock, N., Yount, S., & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12–S21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ahmed, S., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50(12), 1060–1070.PubMedCrossRef Ahmed, S., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50(12), 1060–1070.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Basch, E., & Abernethy, A. P. (2011). Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(8), 954–956.PubMedCrossRef Basch, E., & Abernethy, A. P. (2011). Supporting clinical practice decisions with real-time patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(8), 954–956.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314.PubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Cancer patient-reported outcomes assessment using wireless touch screen tablet computers
Auteurs
G. J. Stukenborg
L. Blackhall
J. Harrison
J. S. Barclay
P. Dillon
M. A. Davis
M. Mallory
P. Read
Publicatiedatum
01-06-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0595-2