Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The relationship between subjective invulnerability and optimism bias in risk appraisal, and their comparative association with indices of risk activity, substance use and college adjustment problems was assessed in a sample of 350 (M age = 20.17; 73% female; 93% White/European American) emerging adults. Subjective invulnerability was measured with the newly devised adolescent invulnerability scale (AIS). Optimism bias in decision-making was assessed with a standard comparative-conditional risk appraisal task. Results showed that the danger- and psychological invulnerability subscales of the AIS demonstrated strong internal consistency and evidence of predictive validity. Subjective invulnerability and optimism bias were also shown to be empirically distinct constructs with differential ability to predict risk and adjustment. Danger invulnerability and psychological invulnerability were more pervasively associated with risk behavior than was optimism bias; and psychological invulnerability counter-indicated depression, self-esteem and interpersonal problems. Results support recent claims regarding the “two faces” of adolescent invulnerability. Implications for future research are drawn.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Anton, W. D., & Reed, J. R. (1991). College adjustment scales. Odessa, FL: Psychological Resources Inc.
Chang, E. C., Asakawa, K., & Sanna, L. J. (2001). Cultural variations in optimistic and pessimistic bias: Do Easterners really expect the worst and Westerners really expect the best when predicting future life events? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 476–491. doi: 10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.526. CrossRefPubMed
Duggan, P. M., Lapsley, D. K., & Norman, K. (2000). Adolescent invulnerability and personal uniqueness: Scale development and initial construct validation. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Chicago, Illinois, April 2000.
Flannery, D. J., Rowe, D. C., & Gulley, B. L. (1993). Impact of pubertal status, timing, and age on adolescent sexual experiences and delinquency. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 21–40. CrossRef
Hill, P. L., & Lapsley, D. K. (2009). Adaptive and maladaptive narcissism in adolescence. In C. T. Barry, P. Kerig, K. Stellwagen & T. D. Barry (Eds.), Implications of narcissism and Machiavellianism for the development of prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth. Washington, DC: APA Press (in press).
Lapsley, D. (2003). The two faces of adolescent invulnerability. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 25–31). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lapsley, D. K., Aalsma, M., & Halpern-Felsher, B. (2005). Invulnerability and risk behaviour in early adolescence. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, 8 April 2005.
Lapsley, D., & Rice, K. (1988). The “new look” at the imaginary audience and personal fable: Toward a general model of adolescent ego development. In D. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Self, ego, and identity: Integrative approaches (pp. 109–129). New York: Springer–Verlag.
Millstein, S. G., & Halpern-Felsher, B. L. (2002a). Judgments about risk and perceived invulnerability in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 399–422.
Radcliffe, N. M., & Klein, W. M. P. (2002). Dispositional, unrealistic and comparative optimism: Differential relations with the knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 836–846. doi: 10.1177/0146167202289012. CrossRef
Rowe, D. S., & Flannery, D. (1994). An examination of environmental and trait influences on adolescent delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 374–389. CrossRef
Steinberg, L. D. (2003). Is decision-making the right framework for research on adolescent risk-taking? In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 18–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1–8.
- Subjective Invulnerability, Optimism Bias and Adjustment in Emerging Adulthood
Daniel K. Lapsley
Patrick L. Hill
- Springer US