Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Relationship quality, as measured by relationship satisfaction and stability, is important to understanding how happy a couple is and the chances their relationship will end. Prior research has linked two aspects of relationship self-regulation (RSR), effort and strategies to improve a relationship, to increased levels of satisfaction and stability, but has not yet examined if gender moderates this association. Our paper addresses how both aspects of RSR are associated with increases in satisfaction and stability for male and female partners using data from the RELATionship Evaluation Survey. In the sample of 8006 men and women in a variety of romantic unions, we find that both aspects of RSR are positively associated with both aspects of relationship quality, but that this association is stronger for women’s reports of satisfaction than men’s. Additionally, relationship effort has a slightly stronger association with stability for women than men. Both clinical and research applications of these findings are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1997). A generation at risk: Growing up in an era of family upheaval. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press.
Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriage. Yale: Yale University Press.
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964–980. CrossRef
Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 833–846. CrossRef
Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 668–678. CrossRef
Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50(4), 308–316. CrossRef
Canary, D. J., Stafford, L., & Semic, B. A. (2002). A panel study of the associations between maintenance strategies and relational characteristics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 395–406. CrossRef
Cole, C. L., & Cole, A. L. (1999). Boundary ambiguities that bind former spouses together after the children leave home in post-divorce families. Family Relations, 48(3), 271–272. CrossRef
Culp, L. N., & Beach, S. R. (1998). Marriage and depressive symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(4), 647–663. CrossRef
England, P. (2000). Marriage, the costs of children, and gender inequality (pp. 320–342). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation.
Glenn, N. D. (1998). The course of marital success and failure in five American 10-year marriage cohorts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 569–576. CrossRef
Halford, W. K. (2011). Marriage and relationship education: What works and how to provide it. New York: The Guilford Press.
Halford, W. K., Sanders, M. R., & Behrens, B. C. (1994). Self-regulation in behavioral couples’ therapy. Behavior Therapy, 25(3), 431–452. CrossRef
Hawkins, D. N., & Booth, A. (2005). Unhappily ever after: Effects of long-term, low-quality marriages on well-being. Social Forces, 84(1), 451–471. CrossRef
Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23(3), 392–409. CrossRef
Hoffmann, J. P., & Shafer, K. (2015). Linear regression analysis: Assumptions and applications. Washington, D.C.: NASW Press.
Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105–129. CrossRef
Johnson, D. R., & Young, R. (2011). Toward best practices in analyzing datasets with missing data: Comparisons and recommendations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(5), 926–945. CrossRef
Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2004). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Vl. Theoretical update. Family Process, 22(1), 69–83. CrossRef
Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M., & Buehler, C. (2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 576–593. CrossRef
Shafer, K., Jensen, T. M., & Larson, J. H. (2014b). An actor-partner model of relationship effort and marital quality. Family Relations, 63(5), 654–666. CrossRef
Simon, R. W. (2002). Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 1065–1096. CrossRef
Skinner, K. B., Bahr, S. J., Crane, D. R., & Call, V. R. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, and remarriage—a comparison of relationship quality over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 74–90. CrossRef
Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Remarriage and the nature of divorce: Does it matter which spouse chose to leave? Journal of Family Issues, 23(3), 410–440. CrossRef
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1995). The place of feminism in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(4), 847–865. CrossRef
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2003). Parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 574–583. CrossRef
Umberson, D., & Williams, K. (2005). Marital quality, health, and aging: Gender equity? Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 60(2), S109–S113. CrossRef
- Relationship Self-Regulation and Relationship Quality: The Moderating Influence of Gender
Spencer L. James
Jeffry H. Larson
- Springer US