Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Brief Communication

Quality of life measures in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index

Auteurs: Silvia Schiavolin, Rui Quintas, Paolo Ferroli, Francesco Acerbi, Stefano Brock, Alberto Cusin, Marco Schiariti, Sergio Visintini, Morgan Broggi, Matilde Leonardi, Alberto Raggi

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 2/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the validity, reliability and factor structure of the Italian version of the EUROHIS-QOL (European Health Interview Survey-Quality of Life) 8-item index in patients who are potential candidates for neurosurgical procedures.

Methods

Cross-sectional study. Patients completed the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index, a disability and general well-being questionnaire; the Karnofsky performance status scale (KPS) was used as a general measure of functional status. Factor analysis was used to confirm the one-factor structure of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index. Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, item-total correlation and inter-item correlation. Construct validity was assessed with Pearson’s coefficient (expected to be below 0.70) and known-group analysis, dividing patients between those KPS >90 and KPS ≤90 (the latter expected to report lower QoL).

Results

The one-factor structure was partly confirmed, with two items having low loadings. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.78; item-total correlations were below 0.70; and average inter-item correlation was 0.309. Correlations were all significant and moderate; known-group analysis shows that QoL scores were lower in patients with active symptoms (KPS ≤90).

Conclusions

Our findings partly confirm the factor structure and reliability of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index, which suggests that it may be a useful and straightforward quality of life measurement technique in neurosurgical departments.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Sherman, J. H., Hoes, K., Marcus, J., Komotar, R. J., Brennan, C. W., & Gutin, P. H. (2011). Neurosurgery for brain tumors: update on recent technical advances. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 11(3), 313–319.PubMedCrossRef Sherman, J. H., Hoes, K., Marcus, J., Komotar, R. J., Brennan, C. W., & Gutin, P. H. (2011). Neurosurgery for brain tumors: update on recent technical advances. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 11(3), 313–319.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Garrett, M., Consiglieri, G., & Nakaji, P. (2010). Transcranial minimally invasive neurosurgery for tumors. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 21(4), 595–605.PubMedCrossRef Garrett, M., Consiglieri, G., & Nakaji, P. (2010). Transcranial minimally invasive neurosurgery for tumors. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 21(4), 595–605.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hall, W. A., & Truwit, C. L. (2008). Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(2), 368–375.PubMedCrossRef Hall, W. A., & Truwit, C. L. (2008). Intraoperative MR-guided neurosurgery. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(2), 368–375.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wong, J. M., Ziewacz, J. E., Ho, A. L., Panchmatia, J. R., Kim, A. H., Bader, A. M., et al. (2012). Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: open cerebrovascular neurosurgery. Neurosurgical Focus, 33(5), E15.PubMedCrossRef Wong, J. M., Ziewacz, J. E., Ho, A. L., Panchmatia, J. R., Kim, A. H., Bader, A. M., et al. (2012). Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: open cerebrovascular neurosurgery. Neurosurgical Focus, 33(5), E15.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gross, B. A., & Du, R. (2012). Cerebrovascular neurosurgery 2011. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 19(10), 1344–1347.PubMedCrossRef Gross, B. A., & Du, R. (2012). Cerebrovascular neurosurgery 2011. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 19(10), 1344–1347.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kanat, A., & Yazar, U. (2013). Spinal surgery and neurosurgeon: quo vadis? Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences, 57(1), 75–79.PubMed Kanat, A., & Yazar, U. (2013). Spinal surgery and neurosurgeon: quo vadis? Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences, 57(1), 75–79.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Damodaran, O., Lee, J., & Lee, G. (2013). Microscope in modern spinal surgery: advantages, ergonomics and limitations. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 83(4), 211–214.PubMedCrossRef Damodaran, O., Lee, J., & Lee, G. (2013). Microscope in modern spinal surgery: advantages, ergonomics and limitations. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 83(4), 211–214.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gibson, J. N., Cowie, J. G., & Iprenburg, M. (2012). Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery: the future ‘gold standard’ for discectomy?—A review. Surgeon, 10(5), 290–296.PubMedCrossRef Gibson, J. N., Cowie, J. G., & Iprenburg, M. (2012). Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery: the future ‘gold standard’ for discectomy?—A review. Surgeon, 10(5), 290–296.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Taphoorn, M. J., Sizoo, E. M., & Bottomley, A. (2010). Review on quality of life issues in patients with primary brain tumours. Oncologist, 15(6), 618–626.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Taphoorn, M. J., Sizoo, E. M., & Bottomley, A. (2010). Review on quality of life issues in patients with primary brain tumours. Oncologist, 15(6), 618–626.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Carod-Artal, F. J., & Egido, J. A. (2009). Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 27(Suppl 1), 204–214.PubMedCrossRef Carod-Artal, F. J., & Egido, J. A. (2009). Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 27(Suppl 1), 204–214.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hill, M. R., Noonan, V. K., Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., & SCIRE Research Team. (2010). Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord, 48(6), 438–450.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hill, M. R., Noonan, V. K., Sakakibara, B. M., Miller, W. C., & SCIRE Research Team. (2010). Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord, 48(6), 438–450.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.CrossRef WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.PubMedCrossRef Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schmidt, S., Mühlan, H., & Power, M. (2006). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16(4), 420–428.PubMedCrossRef Schmidt, S., Mühlan, H., & Power, M. (2006). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16(4), 420–428.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ustun, T. B., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S., & Rehm, J. (2010). Measuring health and disability: manual for the WHO disability assessment schedule. Geneva: World Health Organization. Ustun, T. B., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S., & Rehm, J. (2010). Measuring health and disability: manual for the WHO disability assessment schedule. Geneva: World Health Organization.
16.
go back to reference Grossi, E., Groth, N., Mosconi, P., Cerutti, R., Pace, F., Compare, A., et al. (2006). Development and validation of the short version of the psychological general well-being index (PGWB-S). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 88.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Grossi, E., Groth, N., Mosconi, P., Cerutti, R., Pace, F., Compare, A., et al. (2006). Development and validation of the short version of the psychological general well-being index (PGWB-S). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4, 88.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Karnofsky, D. A., & Burchenal, J. H. (1949). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In C. M. MacLeod (Ed.), Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Colombia University Press. Karnofsky, D. A., & Burchenal, J. H. (1949). The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In C. M. MacLeod (Ed.), Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. New York: Colombia University Press.
18.
go back to reference Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.CrossRef Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
21.
go back to reference Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6(2), 107–128.CrossRef Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6(2), 107–128.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference da Rocha, N. S., Power, M. J., Bushnell, D. M., & Fleck, M. P. (2012). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOL-BREF. Value in Health, 15(3), 449–457.PubMedCrossRef da Rocha, N. S., Power, M. J., Bushnell, D. M., & Fleck, M. P. (2012). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: comparative psychometric properties to its parent WHOQOL-BREF. Value in Health, 15(3), 449–457.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Quality of life measures in Italian neurosurgical patients: validity of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index
Auteurs
Silvia Schiavolin
Rui Quintas
Paolo Ferroli
Francesco Acerbi
Stefano Brock
Alberto Cusin
Marco Schiariti
Sergio Visintini
Morgan Broggi
Matilde Leonardi
Alberto Raggi
Publicatiedatum
01-02-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0784-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2015

Quality of Life Research 2/2015 Naar de uitgave