Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2014 | Brief Communication

Psychometric properties of the French Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

Auteurs: Sophie Wylomanski, Réjane Bouquin, Henri-Jean Philippe, Yves Poulin, Matthieu Hanf, Brigitte Dréno, Roman Rouzier, Gaëlle Quéreux

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2014

Abstract

Introduction

Few validated questionnaires are available in French to assess sexual function. The aim of this study was thus to validate a French version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in a sample of French women.

Methods

In this prospective monocentric and cross-sectional study, an already existing French version of the FSFI, was back-translated and compared to the original version. It was then randomly distributed to 800 women attending Gynecology consultation at Nantes University Hospital in April 2012. Various statistical analyzes were used to test the psychometric properties of the French FSFI.

Results

512 questionnaires were completed. Mean FSFI summary score was 25.2. Intraclass correlation coefficients were superior to 0.75 and Cronbach’s coefficients superior to 0.8 similarly to the original version. Variance analysis revealed significant differences in summary score between premenopausal and postmenopausal women and according to the marital status. Convergent validity was excellent (100 %) and discriminant validity was satisfactory (89.5 %). The factorial structure corresponded to the original version with six retrieved dimensions.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated similar or adequate psychometric properties of the French version of the FSFI compared to the original English version.

vorige artikel Psychometric properties of the eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey based on Spanish outpatients

volgende artikel Evaluation properties of the French version of the OUT-PATSAT35 satisfaction with care questionnaire according to classical and item response theory analyses

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. JAMA, 281(6), 537–544.PubMed

Althof, S. E., Rosen, R. C., DeRogatis, L., Corty, E., Quirk, F., & Symonds, T. (2005). Outcome measurement in female sexual dysfunction clinical trials: Review and recommendations. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31(2), 153–166.PubMedCrossRef

Ficek, L., Miotła, P., & Rechberger, T. (2005). Women’s sexual life quality assessment with use of questionnaires in clinical trials–review of accessible tools, their characteristics and comparison of their properties. Ginekologia Polska, 76(12), 1000–1007.PubMed

Caremel, R., Berthier, A., Sentilhes, L., Collard, P., & Grise, P. (2008). Analysis of a French female sexuality reference population. Progrès en urologie, 18(8), 527–535. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2008.03.035.PubMedCrossRef

Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., et al. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26(2), 191–208. doi:10.1080/009262300278597.PubMedCrossRef

Chedraui, P., Pérez-López, F. R., Mezones-Holguin, E., San Miguel, G., & Avila, C. (2011). Assessing predictors of sexual function in mid-aged sexually active women. Maturitas, 68(4), 387–390. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.12.004.PubMedCrossRef

Aslan, E., Beji, N. K., Gungor, I., Kadioglu, A., & Dikencik, B. K. (2008). Prevalence and risk factors for low sexual function in women: A study of 1,009 women in an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Istanbul. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(9), 2044–2052. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00873.x.PubMedCrossRef

Esposito, K., Ciotola, M., Giugliano, F., Bisogni, C., Schisano, B., Autorino, R., et al. (2007). Association of body weight with sexual function in women. International Journal of Impotence Research, 19(4), 353–357. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901548.PubMedCrossRef

Trudel, G., Dargis, L., Cadieux, J., Villeneuve, L., Préville, M., & Boyer, R. (2012). Validation de l’Index de la fonction sexuelle féminine (IFSF) et présentation de normes chez les femmes aînées. Sexologies, 21(3), 161–167. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2012.01.003.CrossRef

10.

Lavoué, V., Lemarrec, A., Bertheuil, N., Henno, S., Mesbah, H., Watier, E., et al. (2013). Quality of life and female sexual function after skinning vulvectomy with split-thickness skin graft in women with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or vulvar Paget disease. European Journal of Surgical Oncology,. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.014.PubMed

11.

Morcel, K., Lavoué, V., Jaffre, F., Paniel, B.-J., & Rouzier, R. (2013). Sexual and functional results after creation of a neovagina in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A comparison of nonsurgical and surgical procedures. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 169(2), 317–320. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.005.PubMedCrossRef

12.

FSFI auto questionnaire. (2012, août 5). urofrance.org. Consulté 8 janvier 2013, à l’adresse about: blank.

13.

Fayers, P., & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis, and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

14.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRef

15.

R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

16.

Berman, J. R., & Bassuk, J. (2002). Physiology and pathophysiology of female sexual function and dysfunction. World Journal of Urology, 20(2), 111–118. doi:10.1007/s00345-002-0281-4.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Berman, J. R., Berman, L. A., Werbin, T. J., & Goldstein, I. (1999). Female sexual dysfunction: Anatomy, physiology, evaluation and treatment options. Current Opinion in Urology, 9(6), 563–568.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Sarrel, P. M. (1990). Sexuality and menopause. Obstetrics and gynecology, 75(4 Suppl), 26S–30S; discussion 31S–35S.

19.

INSEE. (2013). Internet website of the National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). Consulté 1 août 2013, à l’adresse.

20.

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Psychometric properties of the French Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Auteurs: Sophie Wylomanski
Réjane Bouquin
Henri-Jean Philippe
Yves Poulin
Matthieu Hanf
Brigitte Dréno
Roman Rouzier
Gaëlle Quéreux
Publicatiedatum: 01-09-2014
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0652-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2014

Psychometric properties of the eight-item modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey based on Spanish outpatients

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Bulgarian version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory

Psychosocial determinants of quality of life in parents of obese children seeking inpatient treatment

Comparing PROMIS computer-adaptive tests to the Brief Symptom Inventory in patients with prostate cancer

Enacted and internalized stigma and quality of life among people with HIV: the role of group identity

Health-related quality of life and body mass index among US adolescents