Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The PainCAS is a web-based clinical tool for assessing and tracking pain and opioid risk in chronic pain patients. Despite evidence for its utility within the clinical setting, the PainCAS scales have never been subject to psychometric evaluation. The current study is the first to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PainCAS Interference with Daily Activities, Psychological/Emotional Distress, and Pain scales.
Patients (N = 4797) from treatment centers and hospitals in 16 different states completed the PainCAS as part of routine clinical assessment. A subsample (n = 73) from two hospital-based treatment centers also completed comparator measures. Rasch Rating Scale Models were employed to evaluate the Interference with Daily Activities and Psychological/Emotional Distress scales, and empirical evaluation included assessment of dimensionality, discrimination, item fit, reliability, information, and person-to-item targeting. Additionally, convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated through classical test theory approaches. Convergent validity of the Pain scales was evaluated through correlations with corresponding comparator items.
One Interference with Daily Activities item was removed due to poor functioning and discrimination. The retained items from the Interference with Daily Activities and Psychological/Emotional Distress scales conformed to unidimensional Rasch measurement models, yielding satisfactory item fit, reliability, precision, and coverage. Further, results provided support for the convergent and discriminant validity of these two scales. Convergent validity between the PainCAS Pain and BPI Pain items was also strong.
Taken together, results provide strong psychometric support for these PainCAS Pain scales. Strengths and limitations of the current study are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Zacharoff, K., Butler, S. F., Jamison, R., Budman, S., Charity, S., & Yiu, E. (2010). Development of the pain assessment interview network-clinical advisory system (painCAS), a systematic computer-administered assessment of chronic pain patients. The Journal of Pain, 11(4), S3. CrossRef
Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Cleeland, C. S., & Ryan, K. M. (1994). Pain assessment: Global use of the brief pain inventory. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 23(0304–4602), 129–138. PubMed
McNair, D., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. (1971). Manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Haythornthwaite, J. A., & Edwards, R. R. (2007). Profile of mood states (POMS), Presented at the fourth meeting of the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials.
Andrich, D. (1978). Application of a psychometric model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(4), 581–594. CrossRef
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Linacre, J. M. (2015). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS/MINISTEP Rasch-Model Computer Programs (3.91.0). Retrieved Jan 25, 2016 from http://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-ManualPDF.zip.
IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Reckase, M. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207–230. CrossRef
Linacre, J. M. (2000). Item discrimination and infit mean-squares. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 14(2), 743.
Smith, R. M. (1996). Polytomous mean-square fit statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 10(3), 516–517.
Linacre, J. M. (2017). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.
Institute of Medicine. (2012). Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Retrieved Mar 23, 2016 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13172/relieving-pain-in-america-a-blueprint-for-transforming-prevention-care.
- Psychometric evaluation of the PainCAS Interference with Daily Activities, Psychological/Emotional Distress, and Pain scales
Stacey A. McCaffrey
Ryan A. Black
Stephen F. Butler
- Springer International Publishing