Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1722-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The present study evaluated the distributional and structural characteristics and explanatory power of the 23-item Brief Appraisal Inventory (BAI), a more practical appraisal measure for use in clinical research and practice.
A heterogeneous, online cohort of chronic disease patients and caregivers completed the BAI, along with demographics, comorbidities, PROMIS-10, and the Brief NEO Personality Inventory. Principal components, bivariate, and linear and logistic regression analyses addressed BAI item distributions, structure, and construct validity.
The study sample (n = 592) had a mean age of 43.8 (SD = 18.5), and was 79% female. The BAI items exhibited good distributions, and principal component analysis yielded five composite scores: (1) Health Worries; (2) Interpersonal and Independence concerns; (3) Accomplishing Goals and Problem-Solving; (4) Calm, Peaceful, and Active; (5) Spiritual Growth and Altruism. The construct validity of appraisal factors is supported by their zero-order correlations with demographic, health, personality, and health-related QOL measures. Comparisons of appraisal-correlates among comorbidity-burden subgroups shed light on the mediating role that appraisal may play in adapting to chronic illness. Appraisal moderated the influence of comorbidities on emotional but not physical functioning. The performance of the BAI in explaining unique variance in physical and emotional functioning is comparable to results obtained with earlier measures.
The BAI provides a practical, short tool for evaluating appraisal in a wide range of assessment situations. Future research might utilize the BAI in longitudinal research aimed at detecting response-shift effects over time, and in clinical settings to improve patient-provider communication about concerns related to health, health care, or QOL.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Morganstern, B. A., Bernard, B., Dalbagni, G., Shabsigh, A., & Rapkin, B. D. (2011). The psychological context of quality of life: a psychometric analysis of a novel idiographic measure of bladder cancer patients’ personal goals and concerns prior to surgery. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-10. PubMedPubMedCentral
Schwartz, C. E., Michael, W., & Rapkin, B. D. (2017). Resilience to health challenges is related to different ways of thinking: Mediators of quality of life in a heterogeneous rare-disease cohort. Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1633-2.
Nevadunsky, N. S., Brodt, Z., Eti, S., Selwyn, P., Rapkin, B., Einstein, M., et al. (2011). Utilization of palliative medicine in a racially and ethnically diverse population of women with gynecologic malignancies. Cancer Research, 71(8 Supplement), 5026–5026. CrossRef
Nevadunsky, N. S., Gordon, S., Spoozak, L., Van Arsdale, A., Hou, Y., Klobocista, M., et al. (2014). The role and timing of palliative medicine consultation for women with gynecologic malignancies: Association with end of life interventions and direct hospital costs. Gynecologic Oncology, 132(1), 3–7. CrossRefPubMed
Rapkin, B. D., Garcia, I., Michael, W., Zhang, J., & Schwartz, C. E. (2017). Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: Introducing the Quality-of-Life Appraisal Profile version 2. Quality of Life Research, 26, 2815–2829. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1600-y. CrossRefPubMed
Van Gelderen, M. (2012). Perseverance strategies of enterprising individuals. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18(6), 630–648. CrossRef
Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social Epidemiology, 1, 137–173.
Finkelstein, J., Kallen, M. A., Quaranto, B., Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2012). Appraisal processes in people awaiting spine surgery: Investigating quality of life using mixed methods [Abstract]. Quality of Life Research, 20, 106.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th edn.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sangha, O., Stucki, G., Liang, M. H., Fossel, A. H., & Katz, J. N. (2003). The self-administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Care & Research, 49(2), 156–163. CrossRef
Schwartz, C. E., Michael, W., Zhang, J., Rapkin, B. D., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2017). Assessing reserve-building pursuits and person characteristics: Psychometric validation of the reserve-building measure. Quality of Life Research. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1694-2.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203–212. CrossRef
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. (24 edn.). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
StataCorp (2015). Stata: Release 14. In S. Software (Ed.), (Vol. 14). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287–311. CrossRef
Jääskeläinen, R. (2010). Think-aloud protocol. Handbook of Translation Studies, 1, 371–373. CrossRef
- Development of a practical outcome measure to account for individual differences in quality-of-life appraisal: the Brief Appraisal Inventory
Bruce D. Rapkin
Carolyn E. Schwartz
- Springer International Publishing