Top

Gepubliceerd in:

09-01-2024 | Original Paper

Parenting Behaviors and Creativity: The Roles of Autonomous and Controlled Motivation

Auteurs: Xu Han, Yueqi Shi, Huiting Miao, Ling Wang

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 4/2024

Abstract

Previous research has shown that parenting behaviors are strongly related to adolescents’ creativity development. Based on the ecological systems model of creativity development, the componential model of creativity, and the self-determination theory, our study investigated the indirect roles of autonomous and controlled motivations in the association between parenting behaviors and creativity in Chinese adolescents. Participants (N = 411) completed the Parenting Behaviors Scale, Learning Self-regulation Scale, Creativity Self-report Scale, and two tasks in the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Correlation analysis revealed that autonomy support is positively related to autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and creativity; psychological control is positively related to controlled motivation and creativity; and autonomous motivation and controlled motivation are both positively related to creativity. Structural equation modeling suggested that autonomy support was positively associated with creativity both directly (p = 0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.029, 0.205]) and via autonomous motivation (p < 0.001, CI [0.045, 0.127]), whereas psychological control was negatively associated with creativity via controlled motivation (p = 0.032, CI [−0.074, −0.009]). Generally, autonomous motivation and controlled motivation play indirect roles in the association between parenting behaviors and creativity. The results provided insights into the relationship between parenting behaviors and creativity and its indirect mechanism, as well as suggested implications for the pathways of creativity improvement in parenting.

vorige artikel Mother-Father Differences in Risk Factors for Postnatal Psychological Distress: Results from the German SKKIPPI Cohort Study

volgende artikel The Role of Mothers’ and Fathers’ Perfectionistic Concerns and Emotional Dysregulation in the Co-Occurrence between Work-Family Conflict and Parental Burnout

Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.221.CrossRef

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.

Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393.

Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950.

Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001.

Barber, B. K., & Xia, M. (2013). The centrality of control to parenting and its effects. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 61–87). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13948-004.

Baum, I. R., & Baumann, N. (2018). Autonomous creativity: The implicit autonomy motive fosters creative production and innovative behavior at school. Gifted and Talented International, 33(1–2), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1608136.

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4.

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.905247.CrossRef

Benneker, I. M., Lee, N. C., & van Atteveldt, N. (2023). Mindset and perceived parental support of autonomy safeguard adolescents’ autonomous motivation during COVID-19 home-based learning. NPJ Science of Learning, 8(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00153-2.

Brunet, J., Gunnell, K. E., Gaudreau, P., & Sabiston, C. M. (2015). An integrative analytical framework for understanding the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.034.CrossRef

Chen, P., Zhang, J., Li, H., & Fu, M. (2021). Relationships between parenting behaviors and adolescents’ creativity in China: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 155(5), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2021.1902916.CrossRefPubMed

Chen, Y., Li, R., & Liu, X. (2018). Parental psychological control, autonomy support and externalizing problem behavior in adolescents: The mediating role of controlled motivation. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(5), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000644.CrossRef

Cheung, C. S., Pomerantz, E. M., Wang, M., & Qu, Y. (2016). Controlling and autonomy‐supportive parenting in the United States and China: Beyond children’s reports. Child Development, 87(6), 1992–2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12567.CrossRefPubMed

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Costa, S., Gugliandolo, M. C., Barberis, N., Cuzzocrea, F., & Liga, F. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of parental psychological control and autonomy support: The role of psychological basic needs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1168–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518756778.CrossRef

Deater-Deckard, K., Lansford, J. E., Malone, P. S., Alampay, L. P., Sorbring, E., Bacchini, D., Bombi, A. S., Bornstein, M. H., Chang, L., Di Giunta, L., Dodge, K. A., Oburu, P., Pastorelli, C., Skinner, A. T., Tapanya, S., Tirado, L. M. U., Zelli, A., & Al-Hassan, S. M. (2011). The association between parental warmth and control in thirteen cultural groups. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(5), 790–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x.CrossRefPubMed

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.CrossRef

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.

Deci, E. L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2004). Self-determination theory and basic need satisfaction: Understanding human development in positive psychology. Psychology Research, 27(1), 23–40.

Dong, N., & Wang, X. (2020). Where there’s a will, there’s a way: Intrinsic motivational orientation, idea quality, and idea implementation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(06), 801–810. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00801.CrossRef

Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–492). Information Age.

Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085.

Gu, J., He, C., & Liu, H. (2015). Supervisory styles and graduate student creativity: The mediating roles of creative self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1072149.

Gugliandolo, M. C., Costa, S., Kuss, D. J., Cuzzocrea, F., & Verrastro, V. (2020). Technological addiction in adolescents: The interplay between parenting and psychological basic needs. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18, 1389–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00156-4.CrossRef

Guo, D., Huang, M., & Ma, Q. (2000). Creativity and creative motivation of scientific researchers. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(2), 8–13.

Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers’ theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.851.

Hennessey, B. A. (2003). The social psychology of creativity. Science, 47(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308601.CrossRef

Hu, W., & Zhou, B. (2010). The influences of motivation on creative scientific problem finding ability of first year students in high school. Psychological Development and Education, 26(01), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2010.01.016.CrossRef

Koestner, R., Otis, N., Powers, T. A., Pelletier, L., & Gagnon, H. (2008). Autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and goal progress. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1201–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00519.x.CrossRefPubMed

Lerner, R. E., Grolnick, W. S., Caruso, A. J., & Levitt, M. R. (2021). Parental involvement and children’s academics: The roles of autonomy support and parents’ motivation for involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102039.

Li, J., Deng, M., Wang, X., & Tang, Y. (2018). Teachers’ and parents’ autonomy support and psychological control perceived in junior-high school: Extending the dual-process model of self-determination theory. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.005.CrossRef

Liang, Q., Niu, W., Cheng, L., & Qin, K. (2022). Creativity outside school: The influence of family background, perceived parenting, and after-school activity on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.521.CrossRef

Liu, G., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Lee, C., Wang, Y., & Brownell, M. (2013). Autonomous motivation and Chinese adolescents’ creative thinking: The moderating role of parental involvement. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843401.CrossRef

Liu, X., Gong, S., Zhou, Y., Feng, X., & Yu, Q. (2020). The relationship among parental autonomy support, parental psychological control and junior high school students’ creative self-efficacy: The mediating role of academic emotions. Psychological Development and Education, 36(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.01.06.CrossRef

Liu, Z. (2019). The prediction of college students’ self-efficacy on creativity: Perceived classroom climate plays a moderating role. [Unpublished master thesis]. Shandong Normal University.

Luan, Y., & Wang, X. (2015). Effect of familial parenting style on intelligence development of children. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 31(9), 1126–1128. https://doi.org/10.11847/zgggws2015-31-09-06.CrossRef

Mih, V. (2013). Role of parental support for learning, autonomous/control motivation, and forms of self-regulation on academic attainment in high school students: A path analysis. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 17(1), 35–39.

Peng, S. L., Cherng, B. L., Chen, H. C., & Lin, Y. Y. (2013). A model of contextual and personal motivations in creativity: How do the classroom goal structures influence creativity via self-determination motivations? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.004.CrossRef

Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). The role of parental control in children’s development in western and east Asian countries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01653.x.CrossRef

Ramis, Y., Torregrosa, M., Viladrich, C., & Cruz, J. (2013). Coaches, peers and parents’ autonomy support and its predictive capacity on young athletes’ self-determined motivation. Annals of Psychology, 29(1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.1.124011.CrossRef

Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734.CrossRef

Ren, F., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2017). Perceived parental control and Chinese middle school adolescents’ creativity: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000078.

Rogers, C. R. (1954). Towards a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11, 249–260.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.CrossRefPubMed

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2015). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and Method (2nd ed., pp. 795–849). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939383.ch20.

Shih, S. S. (2009). An examination of factors related to Taiwanese adolescents’ reports of avoidance strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.5.377-388.CrossRef

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30(1), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.11.001.CrossRef

Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Let us not throw out the baby with the bathwater: Applying the principle of universalism without uniformity to autonomy supportive and controlling parenting. Child Development Perspectives, 9(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12103.

Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Do big five personality factors affect individual creativity? The moderating role of extrinsic motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(7), 941–956. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.941.CrossRef

Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78(5), 1592–1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01085.x.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, Y. A., & Rhemtulla, M. (2021). Power analysis for parameter estimation in structural equation modeling: A discussion and tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918253.

Wei, S., Teo, T., Malpique, A., & Lausen, A. (2022). Parental autonomy support, parental psychological control and Chinese university students’ behavior regulation: The mediating role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 735570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735570.

Wen, Z., Hau, K.-T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). Structural equation model testing: Cutoff criteria for goodness of fit indices and chi-square test. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36(2), 168–194.

Wu, J., Gao, C. F., Wang, J., & Ding, S. (1981a). Torrance tests of creative thinking (figural form A): Guidance and research manual. Yuan Liu Press.

Wu, J., Gao, C. F., Wang, J., & Ding, S. (1981b). Torrance tests of creative thinking (verbal form B): Guidance and research manual. Yuan Liu Press.

Xin, Y., Fu, M., Wang, S., Chen, P., & Zhang, J. (2022). The effects of autonomous motivation on creativity: Moderating role of cognitive inhibition. Journal of Psychological Science, 45(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20220103.CrossRef

Xue, G., Dong, Q., Zhou, L., Zhang, H., & Chen, C. (2001). The relationship of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation to creativity. Psychological Development and Education, 17(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2001.01.002.CrossRef

Yeh, Y. C. (2004). The interactive influences of three ecological systems on R & D personnel’s technological creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_2.CrossRef

Zhang, J., Li, J., Zheng, X., Zhang, S., & Liu, G. (2014). On the relationship between middle school students’ parenting styles and creative thinking: The mediating role of self-concept. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 12(02), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2014.02.001.CrossRef

Zhang, J., Liu, G., Shi, W., & Fu, X. (2011). On the relationship between motivating style and elementary students’ creative thinking: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43, 1138–1150. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2011.01138.CrossRef

Zhang, J., Man, D., Liu, G., Zhang, S., Dou, F., & Lin, C. (2013). A research on the relationship between elementary school students’ parenting styles and social creativity: The mediating role of self-esteem. Psychological Development and Education, 29(6), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.06.002.CrossRef

Zhang, X., Pi, Z., Li, C., & Hu, W. (2021). Intrinsic motivation enhances online group creativity via promoting members’ effort, not interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13045.CrossRef

Titel: Parenting Behaviors and Creativity: The Roles of Autonomous and Controlled Motivation
Auteurs: Xu Han
Yueqi Shi
Huiting Miao
Ling Wang
Publicatiedatum: 09-01-2024
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-023-02781-z

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2024

A Marginalised Role in Parenting and Maltreatment Risks—A Qualitative Content Analysis of Fathers in Japan Reflecting on their Parenting Experiences

Evaluating the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) in Children Aged Between 8–14 Years

Health Anxiety in Adolescents: The Roles of Online Health Information Seeking and Parental Health Anxiety

The Index of Parental Activities, Context and Experiences (I-PACE): Psychometric Properties of a New Brief Early Parenting Questionnaire

Effects of A Family-Based Program for Reducing Risk for Youth Alcohol Use in Mexico

Parental Negative Conditional Regard and School-Aged Children’s Physiological and Subjective Responses to Hypothetical Experiences of Vulnetrability