Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
There is broad agreement that neighborhood contexts are important for adolescent development, but there is less consensus about their association with adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Few studies have examined associations between neighborhood socioeconomic contexts and smoking and alcohol use while also accounting for differences in family and peer risk factors for substance use. Data drawn from the Seattle Social Development Project (N = 808), a gender-balanced (female = 49%), multiethnic, theory-driven longitudinal study originating in Seattle, WA, were used to estimate trajectories of smoking and alcohol use from 5th to 9th grade. Time-varying measures of neighborhood socioeconomic, family, and peer factors were associated with smoking and alcohol use at each wave after accounting for average growth in smoking and alcohol use over time and demographic differences. Results indicated that living in more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods, lower family income, lower family general functioning, more permissive family smoking environments, and affiliation with deviant peers were independently associated with increased smoking. Lower family functioning, more permissive family alcohol use environments, and deviant peers were independently associated with increased alcohol use. The effect of neighborhood disadvantage on smoking was mediated by family income and deviant peers while the effect of neighborhood disadvantage on alcohol use was mediated by deviant peers alone. Family functioning and family substance use did not mediate associations between neighborhood disadvantage and smoking or alcohol use. The results highlight the importance of neighborhood, family, and peer factors in early adolescent smoking and alcohol use. Future studies should examine the unique association of neighborhood disadvantage with adolescent smoking net of family socioeconomics, functioning, and substance use, as well as peer affiliations. Better understanding of the role of contextual factors in early adolescent smoking and alcohol use can help bolster efforts to prevent both short and long harms from substance use.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Allard, S. W. (2017). Places in need: The changing geography of poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus. MPlus Web Notes.
Bailey, J., Samek, D., Keyes, M., Hill, K., Hicks, B., & McGue, M., et al. (2014). General and substance-specific predictors of young adult nicotine dependence, alcohol use disorder, and problem behavior: Replication in two samples. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 138, 161–168. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Meacham, M. C., Young, S. E., & Hawkins, J. D. (2011). Strategies for characterizing complex phenotypes and environments: General and specific family environmental predictors of young adult tobacco dependence, alcohol use disorder, and co-occurring problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118(2), 444–451. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Brody, G. H., Conger, R., Gibbons, F. X., Ge, X., McBride Murry, V., Gerrard, M., & Simons, R. L. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72(4), 1231–1246. CrossRefPubMed
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513. CrossRef
Bryden, A., Roberts, B., Petticrew, M., & McKee, M. (2013). A systematic review of the influence of community level social factors on alcohol use. Health & Place, 21, 70–85. CrossRef
Cambron, C., Guttmannova, K., & Fleming, C. B. (2017). State and national contexts in evaluating cannabis laws: A case study of Washington State. Journal of Drug Issues, 47(1), 74–90.
Catalano, R. F., Fagan, A. A., Gavin, L. E., Greenberg, M. T., Irwin, C. E., Ross, D. A., & Shek, D. T. (2012). Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1653–1664. CrossRef
Catalano, R. E., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Centers for Disease Control Prevention. (2008). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR, 57(45), 1226.
Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., & Roberts, C., et al. (2009). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study, 2010, 271.
Devenish, B., Hooley, M., & Mellor, D. (2017). The pathways between socioeconomic status and adolescent outcomes: A systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1–2), 219–238.
Elliott, D. S., Menard, S., Rankin, B., Elliott, A., Wilson, W. J., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods: Successful development in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., & Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(4), 389–426. CrossRef
Guttmannova, K., Bailey, J. A., Hill, K. G., Lee, J. O., Hawkins, J. D., Woods, M. L., & Catalano, R. F. (2011). Sensitive periods for adolescent alcohol use initiation: Predicting the lifetime occurrence and chronicity of alcohol problems in adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(2), 221–231. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Morrison, D. M., O’Donnell, J., Abbott, R. D., & Day, L. E. (1992b). The Seattle social development project: Effects of the first four years on protective factors and problem behaviors. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 139–161). New York: Guilford Press.
Herrenkohl, T. I., Hawkins, J. D., Abbott, R. D., & Guo, J. (2002). Correspondence between youth report and census measures of neighborhood context. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(3), 225–233. CrossRef
Hoffmann, J. P., & Johnson, R. A. (1998). A national portrait of family structure and adolescent drug use. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(3), 633–645.
Hussong, A. M., Curran, P. J., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., & Carrig, M. M. (2004). Substance abuse hinders desistance in young adults’ antisocial behavior. Development and psychopathology, 16(4), 1029–1046. PubMed
Ingoldsby, E. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E., Schonberg, M., Gilliom, M., & Criss, M. M. (2006). Neighborhood disadvantage, parent–child conflict, neighborhood peer relationships, and early antisocial behavior problem trajectories. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(3), 293–309. CrossRef
Jackson, N., Denny, S., & Ameratunga, S. (2014). Social and socio-demographic neighborhood effects on adolescent alcohol use: A systematic review of multi-level studies. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 10–20. CrossRef
Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Inner-city Poverty in the United States, 111, 186.
Jenson, J. M., & Bender, K. (2014). Preventing child and adolescent problem behavior: Evidence-based strategies in schools, families, and communities. New York: Oxford.
Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2010. Volume I, Secondary School Students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
Leventhal, A. M. (2016). The sociopharmacology of tobacco addiction: implications for understanding health disparities. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 18(2), 110–121. CrossRef
Lydon, D. M., Wilson, S. J., Child, A., & Geier, C. F. (2014). Adolescent brain maturation and smoking: What we know and where we’re headed. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 323–342. CrossRef
Mathur, C., Erickson, D. J., Stigler, M. H., Forster, J. L., & Finnegan, Jr, J. R. (2013). Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status effects on adolescent smoking: A multilevel cohort-sequential latent growth analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), 543–548. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus Version 7 user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Oxford, M. L., Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (2001). Preadolescent predictors of substance initiation: A test of both the direct and mediated effect of family social control factors on deviant peer associations and substance initiation. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27(4), 599–616. CrossRefPubMed
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skinner, M. L., Haggerty, K. P., & Catalano, R. F. (2009). Parental and peer influences on teen smoking: Are White and Black families different? Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(5), 558–563. CrossRef
Spoth, R., Reyes, M. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1999). Assessing a public health approach to delay onset and progression of adolescent substance use: latent transition and log-linear analyses of longitudinal family preventive intervention outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 619. CrossRefPubMed
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Surgeon General. (2016). Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on alcohol, drugs, and health. Washington DC: Author. Retrieved from https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/surgeon-generals-report.pdf
Viner, R. M., Ozer, E. M., Denny, S., Marmot, M., Resnick, M., Fatusi, A., & Currie, C. (2012). Adolescence and the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1641–1652. CrossRef
Wilson, W. (1987). Truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy.
Wodtke, G. T., Elwert, F., & Harding, D. J. (2016). Neighborhood effect heterogeneity by family income and developmental period 1. American Journal of Sociology, 121(4), 1168–1222. CrossRef
- Neighborhood, Family, and Peer Factors Associated with Early Adolescent Smoking and Alcohol Use
Richard F. Catalano
J. David Hawkins
- Springer US