Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 11/2018

06-07-2018 | Original Paper

Lonely Adolescents and Their Best Friend: An Examination of Loneliness and Friendship Quality in Best Friendship Dyads

Auteurs: Annette W. M. Spithoven, Margot Bastin, Patricia Bijttebier, Luc Goossens

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 11/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Friendship experiences have been shown to be important predictors of adolescents’ loneliness. The current study examined selection and socialization effects of loneliness within reciprocal best friendships, while controlling for friendship quality. Analyses were conducted on a sample of 884 adolescents (42.08% boys), making up 442 dyads, who were on average 13.51 years old (SD = 1.37). Adolescents completed the peer-related loneliness subscale of the Loneliness and Aloneness Scale for Children and Adolescents as well as the Friendship Qualities Scale. A longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model, which accounts for the interdependencies in the data of best friends, suggested the presence of a selection effect for loneliness but no socialization effect. This finding within best friendships contrasts with studies on friendship networks where both selection and socialization were established.
Literatuur
go back to reference Berndt, T. J., & McCandless, M. A. (2009). Methods for investigating children’s relationships with friends. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 63–81). London, UK: Guilford Press. Berndt, T. J., & McCandless, M. A. (2009). Methods for investigating children’s relationships with friends. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups (pp. 63–81). London, UK: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Goossens, L. (2016). Louvain Loneliness and Aloneness scale for Children and Adolescents. Leuven, BE: Acco. [Leuvense Eenzaamheidsschaal voor kinderen en adolescenten]. Goossens, L. (2016). Louvain Loneliness and Aloneness scale for Children and Adolescents. Leuven, BE: Acco. [Leuvense Eenzaamheidsschaal voor kinderen en adolescenten].
go back to reference Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. (2006). Dyadic data analysis.. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. (2006). Dyadic data analysis.. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Laursen, B., Popp, D., Burk, W., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: examples from the study of homophily and homogeneity. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig & T. D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in developmental research (pp. 11–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Laursen, B., Popp, D., Burk, W., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2008). Incorporating interdependence into developmental research: examples from the study of homophily and homogeneity. In N. A. Card, J. P. Selig & T. D. Little (Eds.), Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in developmental research (pp. 11–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2012. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. 2012.
go back to reference Nelis, S., Bastin, M., Raes, F., Mezulis, A., & Bijttebier, P. (2016). Trait affectivity and response styles to positive affect: Negative affectivity relates to dampening and positive affectivity relates to enhancing.Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 148–154.CrossRef Nelis, S., Bastin, M., Raes, F., Mezulis, A., & Bijttebier, P. (2016). Trait affectivity and response styles to positive affect: Negative affectivity relates to dampening and positive affectivity relates to enhancing.Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 148–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In R. Gillmour & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships Vol. 3: Personal relationships in disorders (pp. 31–56). London, UK: Academic Press. Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In R. Gillmour & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships Vol. 3: Personal relationships in disorders (pp. 31–56). London, UK: Academic Press.
go back to reference Ulman, J. B. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. (pp. 681–785). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Ulman, J. B. (2013). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. (pp. 681–785). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Metagegevens
Titel
Lonely Adolescents and Their Best Friend: An Examination of Loneliness and Friendship Quality in Best Friendship Dyads
Auteurs
Annette W. M. Spithoven
Margot Bastin
Patricia Bijttebier
Luc Goossens
Publicatiedatum
06-07-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1183-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2018

Journal of Child and Family Studies 11/2018 Naar de uitgave