Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2017

30-06-2016 | Original Article

Keeping you at arm’s length: modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance

Auteurs: F. Quesque, G. Ruggiero, S. Mouta, J. Santos, T. Iachini, Y. Coello

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Peripersonal space represents the area around the body where objects are coded in motor terms for the purpose of voluntary goal-directed actions. Previous studies have suggested that peripersonal space is also a safe space linked with our private area, influencing interpersonal space in social contexts. However, whether these two spaces rely on similar embodied processes remains an open issue. In the present study, participants observed a point-light walker (PLW) approaching them from different directions and passing near them at different distances from their right or left shoulder. While approaching, the PLW disappeared at a distance of 2 m and the task for the participants was to estimate if the interpersonal distance, at the time the PLW would have reached their level, was comfortable or not. Between two sessions of comfort judgments, the participants manipulated a 70 cm tool entailing an extension of peripersonal space, or a 10 cm tool entailing no extension of peripersonal space. The results revealed that the comfortable interpersonal distance was larger when the PLW crossed the mid-sagittal plane of the participants than when it approached them laterally, with a concomitant increase of response time. After participants manipulated the long tool, comfortable interpersonal distance increased, but predominantly when the PLW trajectory implied crossing the participants’ mid-sagittal plane. This effect was not observed when participants manipulated the short tool. Two control tasks showed that using the long tool modified the reachability (control 1), but not the time to passage (control 2) estimates of PLW stimuli, suggesting that tool use extended peripersonal space without changing perceived visual distances. Overall, the data show that comfortable interpersonal distance is linked to the representation of peripersonal space. As a consequence, increasing peripersonal space through tool use has the immediate consequence that comfortable interpersonal distance from another person also increases, suggesting that interpersonal-comfort space and peripersonal-reaching space share a common motor nature.
Voetnoten
1
Using a reachability judgment task, Bourgeois et al. (2014) found that the peripersonal space increases by 5 cm after having used a 70 cm-long tool (extending arm length by 60 cm). No change of peripersonal space was observed after having used a 10 cm-long tool (extending arm length by 0 cm).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Aiello, J. R., Derisi, D. T., Epstein, Y. M., & Karlin, R. A. (1977). Crowding and the role of interpersonal distance preference. Sociometry, 40, 271–282.CrossRef Aiello, J. R., Derisi, D. T., Epstein, Y. M., & Karlin, R. A. (1977). Crowding and the role of interpersonal distance preference. Sociometry, 40, 271–282.CrossRef
go back to reference Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.PubMed Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.CrossRefPubMed Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bourgeois, J., & Coello, Y. (2012). Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1268–1283.CrossRef Bourgeois, J., & Coello, Y. (2012). Effect of visuomotor calibration and uncertainty on the perception of peripersonal space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1268–1283.CrossRef
go back to reference Bourgeois, J., Farnè, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95.CrossRefPubMed Bourgeois, J., Farnè, A., & Coello, Y. (2014). Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychologica, 148, 91–95.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 341–358.PubMed Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 341–358.PubMed
go back to reference Cardellicchio, P., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2011). The space of affordances: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1369–1372.CrossRefPubMed Cardellicchio, P., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2011). The space of affordances: A TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1369–1372.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cardinali, L., Frassinetti, F., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2009). Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology, 19, R478.CrossRefPubMed Cardinali, L., Frassinetti, F., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2009). Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology, 19, R478.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cardinali, L., Jacobs, S., Brozzoli, C., Frassinetti, F., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2012). Grab an object with a tool and change your body: Tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 259–271.CrossRefPubMed Cardinali, L., Jacobs, S., Brozzoli, C., Frassinetti, F., Roy, A. C., & Farnè, A. (2012). Grab an object with a tool and change your body: Tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 259–271.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: How do we manage threatening objects? Cognitive Processing, 13, 131–135.CrossRef Coello, Y., Bourgeois, J., & Iachini, T. (2012). Embodied perception of reachable space: How do we manage threatening objects? Cognitive Processing, 13, 131–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Coello, Y., & Delevoye-Turrell, Y. (2007). Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 667–683.CrossRefPubMed Coello, Y., & Delevoye-Turrell, Y. (2007). Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 667–683.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2015). Objects and people in space: Towards a unified theoretical framework. In Y. Coello & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). Oxon: Routledge. Coello, Y., & Iachini, T. (2015). Objects and people in space: Towards a unified theoretical framework. In Y. Coello & M. Fischer (Eds.), Foundations of embodied cognition (pp. 198–219). Oxon: Routledge.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207, 95–103.CrossRefPubMed Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207, 95–103.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Delevoye-Turrell, Y., Vienne, C., & Coello, Y. (2011). Space boundaries for social interactions in schizophrenia: action for accurate judgment of interaction capabilities. Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 193–204.CrossRef Delevoye-Turrell, Y., Vienne, C., & Coello, Y. (2011). Space boundaries for social interactions in schizophrenia: action for accurate judgment of interaction capabilities. Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 193–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Evans, G. W., & Wener, R. E. (2007). Crowding and personal space invasion on the train: please don’t make me sit in the middle. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 90–94.CrossRef Evans, G. W., & Wener, R. E. (2007). Crowding and personal space invasion on the train: please don’t make me sit in the middle. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 90–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday. Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.
go back to reference Hayduk, L. A. (1978). Personal space: An evaluative and orienting overview. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 117–134.CrossRef Hayduk, L. A. (1978). Personal space: An evaluative and orienting overview. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 117–134.CrossRef
go back to reference Holmes, N. P. (2012). Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 273–282.CrossRefPubMed Holmes, N. P. (2012). Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 273–282.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2014). Body space in social interactions: A comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PLoS One, 9, e111511.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2014). Body space in social interactions: A comparison of reaching and comfort distance in immersive virtual reality. PLoS One, 9, e111511.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.01.004.CrossRef Iachini, T., Coello, Y., Frassinetti, F., Senese, V. P., Galante, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2016). Peripersonal and interpersonal space in virtual and real environments: Effects of gender and age. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 154–164. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jenvp.​2016.​01.​004.CrossRef
go back to reference Iachini, T., Pagliaro, S., & Ruggiero, G. (2015). Near or far? It depends on my impression: Moral information and spatial behavior in virtual interactions. Acta Psychologica, 161, 131–136.CrossRefPubMed Iachini, T., Pagliaro, S., & Ruggiero, G. (2015). Near or far? It depends on my impression: Moral information and spatial behavior in virtual interactions. Acta Psychologica, 161, 131–136.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7, 2325–2330.CrossRefPubMed Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7, 2325–2330.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.CrossRef Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 201–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaiser, M. K., & Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-to- passage: Observers’ sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1028–1040.PubMed Kaiser, M. K., & Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-to- passage: Observers’ sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1028–1040.PubMed
go back to reference Kennedy, D. P., Gläscher, J., Tyszka, J. M., & Adolphs, R. (2009). Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1226–1227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kennedy, D. P., Gläscher, J., Tyszka, J. M., & Adolphs, R. (2009). Personal space regulation by the human amygdala. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1226–1227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Lockard, J. S., Mcvittie, R. I., & Isaac, L. M. (1977). Functional significance of the affiliative smile. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 367–370.CrossRef Lockard, J. S., Mcvittie, R. I., & Isaac, L. M. (1977). Functional significance of the affiliative smile. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 367–370.CrossRef
go back to reference Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, 25–34.CrossRef Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, 25–34.CrossRef
go back to reference McBride, G., King, G. M., & James, J. W. (1965). Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans. Journal of Psychology, 61, 153–157.CrossRefPubMed McBride, G., King, G. M., & James, J. W. (1965). Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans. Journal of Psychology, 61, 153–157.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Mouta, S., Santos, J. A., & López-Moliner, J. (2012). The time to passage of biological and complex motion. Journal of Vision, 12, 1–4.CrossRef Mouta, S., Santos, J. A., & López-Moliner, J. (2012). The time to passage of biological and complex motion. Journal of Vision, 12, 1–4.CrossRef
go back to reference Proverbio, A. M. (2012). Tool perception suppresses 10–12 Hz μ rhythm EEG over the somatosensory area. Biological Psychology, 91, 1–7.CrossRefPubMed Proverbio, A. M. (2012). Tool perception suppresses 10–12 Hz μ rhythm EEG over the somatosensory area. Biological Psychology, 91, 1–7.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Quinlan, D. J., & Culham, J. C. (2007). fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex. NeuroImage, 36, 167–187.CrossRefPubMed Quinlan, D. J., & Culham, J. C. (2007). fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex. NeuroImage, 36, 167–187.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rossetti, A., Romano, D., Bolognini, N., & Maravita, A. (2015). Dynamic expansion of alert responses to incoming painful stimuli following tool use. Neuropsychologia, 70, 486–494.CrossRefPubMed Rossetti, A., Romano, D., Bolognini, N., & Maravita, A. (2015). Dynamic expansion of alert responses to incoming painful stimuli following tool use. Neuropsychologia, 70, 486–494.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Szpak, A., Loetscher, T., Churches, O., Thomas, N. A., Spence, C. J., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2015). Keeping your distance: attentional withdrawal in individuals who show physiological signs of social discomfort. Neuropsychologia, 70, 462–467.CrossRefPubMed Szpak, A., Loetscher, T., Churches, O., Thomas, N. A., Spence, C. J., & Nicholls, M. E. R. (2015). Keeping your distance: attentional withdrawal in individuals who show physiological signs of social discomfort. Neuropsychologia, 70, 462–467.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Pantelidou, G., Rebacz, P., Västfjäll, D., & Tsakiris, M. (2011). I-space: The Effects of emotional valence and source of music on interpersonal distance. PlosOne, 6, e26083.CrossRef Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Pantelidou, G., Rebacz, P., Västfjäll, D., & Tsakiris, M. (2011). I-space: The Effects of emotional valence and source of music on interpersonal distance. PlosOne, 6, e26083.CrossRef
go back to reference Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.PubMed Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.PubMed
go back to reference Wamain, Y., Gabrielli, F., & Coello, Y. (2015). EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent. Cortex, 74, 20–30.CrossRefPubMed Wamain, Y., Gabrielli, F., & Coello, Y. (2015). EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent. Cortex, 74, 20–30.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Witt, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1479–1492.PubMedPubMedCentral Witt, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1479–1492.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., & Epstein, W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880–888.PubMed Witt, J. K., Proffitt, D. R., & Epstein, W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880–888.PubMed
go back to reference World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 2191–2194. World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 2191–2194.
Metagegevens
Titel
Keeping you at arm’s length: modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance
Auteurs
F. Quesque
G. Ruggiero
S. Mouta
J. Santos
T. Iachini
Y. Coello
Publicatiedatum
30-06-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0782-1

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2017

Psychological Research 4/2017 Naar de uitgave