Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Anxiety, depression, and opioid misuse among ad...

volgende artikel No effect of mindfulness-based cancer recovery ...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

09-06-2020 | Uitgave 1/2021

Incremental criterion validity of message perceptions and effects perceptions in the context of anti-smoking messages

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Behavioral Medicine > Uitgave 1/2021

Auteurs:: Sabeeh A. Baig, Seth M. Noar, Nisha C. Gottfredson, Allison J. Lazard, Kurt M. Ribisl, Noel T. Brewer

Extras

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00163-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

To select promising health messages, formative research has often relied on perceived message effectiveness (PME) scales assessing either of two related constructs, message perceptions (persuasive potential) and effects perceptions (potential for behavioral impact). We sought to examine their incremental criterion validity within a comparative framework. Participants were 703 U.S. adult smokers (ages \(\ge\) 21) who received anti-smoking or comparable control (littering) messages on their cigarette packs for 3 weeks. Structural equation models examined both PME constructs as simultaneous correlates of outcomes from the UNC Tobacco Warnings Model. Message perceptions demonstrated incremental criterion validity with attention, an early behavioral antecedent (\(\beta\) = 0.82, p < .001). Effects perceptions demonstrated incremental criterion validity with later behavioral antecedents (range \(\beta\) = 0.74–0.87, all p < .01) and quitting behaviors (\(\beta\) = 0.36–0.66, all p < .001). Formative research on anti-smoking messages may benefit from focusing on effects perceptions to characterize potential for behavior change.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Baig, S. A., et al. (2018). UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a brief scale. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay080 CrossRefPubMedCentral

Bollen, K. A., Harden, J. J., Ray, S., & Zavisca, J. (2014). BIC and alternative Bayesian information criteria in the selection of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.856691 CrossRef

Bollen, K. A., Ray, S., Zavisca, J., & Harden, J. J. (2012). A comparison of Bayes factor approximation methods including two new methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(2), 294–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452393 CrossRef

Brennan, E., et al. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of antismoking television advertisements: Do audience ratings of perceived effectiveness predict changes in quitting intentions and smoking behaviours? Tobacco Control, 23(5), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050949 CrossRefPubMed

Brewer, N. T., et al. (2018). Cigarette pack messages about toxic chemicals: A randomised clinical trial. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

CDC. (2008). Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2007. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(45), 1221–1226.

Chalmers, R. P. (2015). Extended mixed-effects item response models with the MH-RM algorithm. Journal of Educational Measurement, 52(2), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12072 CrossRef

Core Team, R. (2000). R language definition. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Davis, S., et al. (2009). State-specific prevalence and trends in adult cigarette smoking-United States, 1998–2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 58(9), 221–226.

Davis, K. C., et al. (2011). Exploring African American women’s perceptions of a social marketing campaign to promote HIV testing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 17(3), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245004.2011.595536 CrossRef

Davis, K. C., et al. (2013). Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: The importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning. Health Communication, 28(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.696535 CrossRefPubMed

Davis, K. C., et al. (2016). Perceived effectiveness of antismoking ads and association with quit attempts among smokers: Evidence from the TIPS From Former Smokers campaign. Health Communication, 32(8), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1196413 CrossRefPubMed

Dillard, J. P., & Ha, Y. (2016). Interpreting perceived effectiveness: Understanding and addressing the problem of mean validity. Journal of Health Communication, 21(9), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1204379 CrossRefPubMed

Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007a). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x CrossRef

Dillard, J. P., Weber, K. M., & Vail, R. G. (2007b). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x CrossRef

Dillard, J. P., & Ye, S. (2008). The perceived effectiveness of persuasive messages: Questions of structure, referent, and bias. Journal of Health Communication, 13(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701854060 CrossRefPubMed

Donovan, R. J., Jalleh, G., & Carter, O. B. J. (2006). Tobacco industry smoking prevention advertisements’ impact on youth motivation for smoking in the future. Social Marketing Quarterly, 12(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245000600721644 CrossRef

Fathelrahman, A. I., Omar, M., Awang, R., et al. (2010). Impact of the new Malaysian cigarette pack warnings on smokers’ awareness of health risks and interest in quitting smoking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(11), 4089–4099. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7114089 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Hall, M. G., et al. (2018). Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials. Social Science & Medicine, 213, 165–172. CrossRef

Hyland, A., et al. (2016). Design and methods of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. Tobacco Control, 26(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-052934 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. Journal of Problem Solving. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1167 CrossRef

Keller, P. A., & Block, L. G. (1996). Increasing the persuasiveness of fear appeals: The effect of arousal and elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 448. https://doi.org/10.1086/209461 CrossRef

Klein, W. M. P., Zajac, L. E., & Monin, M. M. (2009). Worry as a moderator of the association between risk perceptions and quitting intentions in young adult and adult smokers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38(3), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9143-2 CrossRefPubMed

Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2007). Health information-seeking behavior. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307305199 CrossRefPubMed

Lee, S., et al. (2011). Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13(4), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq255 CrossRef

Li, L., et al. (2014). Smoking-related thoughts and microbehaviours, and their predictive power for quitting. Tobacco Control, 24(4), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051384 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(3), 479–515. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3903_4 CrossRef

Nelson, D., et al. (2004). The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): Development, design, and dissemination. Journal of Health Communication, 9(5), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490504233 CrossRefPubMed

Niederdeppe, J., et al. (2011). Socioeconomic variation in recall and perceived effectiveness of campaign advertisements to promote smoking cessation. Social Science and Medicine, 72(5), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.12.025 CrossRefPubMed

Noar, S. M. (2006). A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: Where do we go from here? Journal of Health Communication, 11(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500461059 CrossRefPubMed

Noar, S. M., et al. (2016). Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tobacco Control, 25(3), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051978 CrossRefPubMed

Noar, S. M., Barker, J., & Yzer, M. (2018a). Measurement and design heterogeneity in perceived message effectiveness studies: A call for research. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 990–993. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy047 CrossRef

Noar, S. M., et al. (2018b). Perceived message effectiveness measures in tobacco education campaigns: A systematic review. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(4), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1483017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Noar, S. M., et al. (2018c). Identifying principles for effective messages about chemicals in cigarette smoke. Preventive Medicine, 106, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.005 CrossRefPubMed

Nonnemaker, J., et al. (2010). Experimental study of graphic cigarette warning labels. Final Results Report. RTI Project, 7

O’Keefe, D. J. (2018). Message pretesting using assessments of expected or perceived persuasiveness: Evidence about diagnosticity of relative actual persuasiveness. Journal of Communication, 68(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx009 CrossRef

Partos, T. R., et al. (2014). The predictive utility of micro indicators of concern about smoking: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Study. Addictive Behaviors, 39(8), 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Revelle, W. (2011). An overview of the psych package. Department of Psychology Northwestern University. Retrieved 3 March, 2012.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02 CrossRef

Vispoel, W. P., Morris, C. A., & Kilinc, M. (2017). Practical applications of generalizability theory for designing, evaluating, and improving psychological assessments. Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1296455 CrossRefPubMed

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 CrossRefPubMed

Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 CrossRef

Yzer, M., LoRusso, S., & Nagler, R. H. (2014). On the conceptual ambiguity surrounding perceived message effectiveness. Health Communication, 30(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974131 CrossRef

Titel: Incremental criterion validity of message perceptions and effects perceptions in the context of anti-smoking messages
Auteurs:: Sabeeh A. Baig
Seth M. Noar
Nisha C. Gottfredson
Allison J. Lazard
Kurt M. Ribisl
Noel T. Brewer
Publicatiedatum: 09-06-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00163-0
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Incremental criterion validity of message perceptions and effects perceptions in the context of anti-smoking messages

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher's Note

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Electronic supplementary material

Publisher's Note

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

A prospective study of cancer-related benefit finding in uveal melanoma patients

Perceived discrimination predicts elevated biological markers of inflammation among sexual minority adults

A daily study of stressors, continuously measured glucose, and diabetes symptoms in latinos with type 2 diabetes

Temporal changes in psychobehavioural responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia

Social Constraints and PTSD among Chinese American breast cancer survivors: not all kinds of social support provide relief

Pain resilience, pain catastrophizing, and executive functioning: performance on a short-term memory task during simultaneous ischemic pain