Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2023 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

21. Het Kawa-model

Auteurs : Liesbeth de Vries, MSc, Mieke le Granse, MSc

Gepubliceerd in: Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

In dit hoofdstuk wordt het Kawa-model nader toegelicht. Het Kawa-model is ontwikkeld vanuit de praktijk, beoogt cultureel relevant te zijn en de levensstroom van personen in kaart te brengen zonder dat hieraan bepaalde waarden worden gekoppeld. De metafoor van de rivier staat centraal, waarbij het water dat stroomt in die rivier de levensstroom weerspiegelt. De rivierbedding, de aanwezige rotsen en het drijfhout bepalen hoe de stroming is in de rivier, oftewel hoeveel ruimte er is voor het water om te stromen. De rol van ergotherapie is het mogelijk maken en/of optimaliseren van die levensstroom.

vorige hoofdstuk Model Of Human Occupation (MOHO)

volgende hoofdstuk Overige occupation-based ergotherapiemodellen en frameworks

Iwama MK. The Kawa model: culturally relevant occupational therapy. Elsevier; 2006.

Lim KH, Iwama MK. Emerging models–an Asian perspective: the Kawa River model. Foundations for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2006. pp. 161–89.

Lim KH. Working in a transcultural context. Occupational therapy and mental health. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008. pp. 251–75.

Lim KH. No title. Personal journeys of recovery: exploring the experiences of mental health service users engaging with the Kawa ‘River’ model. 2018.

Kelly G, Mcfarlane H. Culture or cult? The mythological nature of occupational therapy. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(4):188–202.CrossRefPubMed

Kinébanian A, Stomph M. Diversity matters: guiding principles on diversity and culture. WFOT bull. 2010 May 1,;61(1):5–13.

Black RM. Culture, diversity and culturally effective care. In: Schell BAB, Gillen G, editors. Willard & Spackmann’s occupational therapy. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. pp. 223–39.

Kielhofner G. Conceptual foundations of occupational therapy practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2009.

Hammell KW. Building globally relevant occupational therapy from the strength of our diversity. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin. 2019;75(1):13–26.CrossRef

10.

Hammell KW. Engagement in living: critical perspectives on occupation, rights, and wellbeing. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists; 2020.

11.

Bonder B, Martin L. Culture in clinical care: strategies for competence. 2nd edition. Slack Incorporated; 2013.

12.

Hasselkus BR. The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare: SLACK Incorporated; 2007.

13.

Martins V, Reid D. New-immigrant women in urban Canada: insights into occupation and sociocultural context. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(4):203–20.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Iwama M. The Kawa (river) model: nature, life flow & the power of culturally relevant occupational therapy. In: Kronenberg FA, SS, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapy without borders. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

15.

Brooke KE, Desmarais CD, Forwell SJ. Types and categories of personal projects: a revelatory means of understanding human occupation. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(4):281–96.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Balcazar FE, Suarez-Balcazar Y, Taylor-Ritzler T. Cultural competence: development of a conceptual framework. Disabil Rehab. 2009;31(14):1153–60.

17.

Beagan BL. Approaches to culture and diversity: a critical synthesis of occupational therapy literature: des approches en matière de culture et de diversité: une synthèse critique de la littérature en ergothérapie. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82(5):272–82.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Törneke N, Hayes SC. Metaphor in practice. Oakland: Context Press; 2017.

19.

Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal. 2015. Available from: https://www.vandale.nl/.

20.

Lakoff G, Johnson M. Leven in metaforen. Sun, Nijmegen; 1999.

21.

Roam D. Blah blah blah: What to do when words don’t work. Penguin; 2011.

22.

Roam D. The back of the napkin: solving problems and selling ideas with pictures. Portfolio; 2013.

23.

Sinek S. Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action. Penguin; 2009.

24.

Brand W. Visueel werken: effectiever samenwerken door zakelijk tekenen. BIS Publishers; 2020.

25.

Sorensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan JM, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12(1):80.

26.

Lape JE, Scaife BD. Use of the KAWA model for teambuilding with rehabilitative professionals: an exploratory study. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2017;15(1):10.

27.

Lape JE, Lukose A, Ritter DR, Scaife BD. Use of the KAWA model to facilitate interprofessional collaboration: a pilot study. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract. 2018;17(1):3.

28.

Weis A, Kugel JD, Javaherian-Dysinger H, De Brun JN. Life after losing an adult child to a drug overdose: a Kawa perspective. Open J Occup Ther. 2019;7(3):1–14.CrossRef

29.

Taylor J, Kay S. The construction of identities in narratives about serious leisure occupations. J Occup Sci. 2015;22(3):260–76.CrossRef

30.

Newbury RS, Lape JE. Well-being, aging in place, and use of the Kawa model: a pilot study. Ann Int Occup Ther. 2020.

31.

Downey H, Threlkeld G, Warburton J. What is the role of place identity in older farming couples’ retirement considerations? J Rural Stud. 2017;50:1–11.CrossRef

32.

American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Occupational Therapy Association; 2020.

Titel: Het Kawa-model
Auteurs: Liesbeth de Vries, MSc
Mieke le Granse, MSc
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Grondslagen van ergotherapie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2828-4

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2829-1

Copyright: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2829-1_21

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen