Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Gepubliceerd in:
hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

22. Overige occupation-based ergotherapiemodellen en frameworks

Auteurs : Anne-Mie Engelen, MSc, Mieke le Granse, MSc, Inka Logister-Proost

Gepubliceerd in: Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Dit hoofdstuk geeft een beschrijving van een aantal minder bekende occupation based ergotherapiemodellen en -frameworks. De persoon (en/of organisatie of gemeenschap) staat centraal en de focus ligt op het dagelijks handelen en participatie. Een aantal van deze modellen en frameworks zijn vrij recent ontwikkeld en sluiten aan bij huidige en toekomstige tendensen in de maatschappij en in de gezondheidszorg. Ieder model of framework wordt kort geïntroduceerd inclusief de theorieën waarop het gebaseerd is, en met hulp van een schema gevisualiseerd. Aan de hand van een praktijkvoorbeeld wordt beschreven hoe elk model of framework in de praktijk ingezet kan worden. Als er bijbehorende assessment-instrumenten voorhanden zijn, worden deze kort benoemd. Elke beschrijving van het occupation based ergotherapiemodel of -framework sluit af met voorbeelden van onderzoek, waar mogelijk evidence en een eventuele connectie met Occupational Science. De beschrijving is kort gehouden en nodigt de geïnteresseerde lezer uit, om met behulp van de aangegeven literatuur, zelf verder op zoek te gaan.
vorige hoofdstuk Het Kawa-model
volgende hoofdstuk Methodisch handelen
Literatuur
1.
Association AOT. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain and process. 4th edition. The Americal Journal of Occupational Therapy; 2020. p. 74.
2.
Organization WH. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO Press; 2008.
3.
Scaffa M. Occupational therapy interventions for groups, communities, and populations. In: B. SBA, G. G, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. pp. 436–47.
4.
5.
Kielhofner G. The model of human occupation: theory and application. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.
6.
Fisher AG, Grisworld LA. Performance skills: implementing performance analyses to evaluate quality of occupational performance. In: Schell BAB, Gillen G, editors. Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th edition. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. pp. 335–50.
7.
Fisher AG, Marterella A. Powerful practice: a model for authentic occupational therapy. Forth Collins: Center for Innovative OT Solutions; 2019.
8.
Association AOT. Occupational therapy practice framework: domain & process. 3rd edition. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:S1–48.
9.
Kaldenberg J, Smallfield S. Occupational therapy practice guidelines for older adults with low vision. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(2):7402397010. pp.1–23.
10.
Chapparo C, Ranka J, Nott M. Occupational performance model (Australia): a description of constructs, structure and propositions. In: Curtin M, Egan M, Adams J, editors. Occupational therapy for people experiencing illness, injury or impairment: promoting occupation and participation. 7th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 134–47.
11.
Chapparo C, Ranka J, Nott M. The perceive, recall, plan & perform (PRPP) system of task analysis and intervention. In: Curtin M, Egan M, Adams J, editors. Occupational therapy for people experiences illness, injury or impairment. 7th ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 243–57.
12.
Timmermans – Heinen L, Steultjens E. Valpreventie bij thuiswonende ouderen: ervaringen van ergotherapeuten met het assessment deel van het Perceive, Recall, Plan en Perform (PRPP) systeem van taakanalyse. Ergotherapie Magazine. 2020;48(6):45–52.
13.
Van Erp S, Steultjens E. Impaired awareness of deficits and cognitive strategy use in occupational performance of persons with acquired brain injury (ABI). Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2020;48(2):101–15.CrossRef
14.
Fisher AG, Jones KG. Assessment of motor and process skills. Volume 1: development, standardization, and administration manual. Fort Collins: Three Star Press; 2010.
15.
Fisher AG. Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52(7):509–21.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Fisher AG. Occupational therapy intervention process model: a model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins, Colorado: Three Star Press Inc.; 2009.
17.
Fisher AG. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: same, same or different? Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20(3):162–73.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Fisher AG, Bryze K, Hume V, Griswold LA. School AMPS: school version of the assessment of motor and process skills. 2nd edition. Fort Collins: Three Star Press, Inc.; 2007.
19.
Lee BK. A transactional perspective on occupation: a critical reflection. Scand J Occup Ther. 2016;23:1–10.
20.
Schkade JK, Schultz S. Occupational adaptation: toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, part 1. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(9):829–37.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Schultz S, Schkade JK. Occupational adaptation: toward a holistic approach for contemporary practice, part 2. Am J Occup Ther. 1992;46(10):917–25.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Schkade JK, McClung M. Occupational adaptation into practice, concepts and cases. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2001.
23.
Grajo L. Occupational adaptation. In: Hinojosa J, Kramer P, Basic Royeen C, editors. Perspectives on human occupation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2017. pp. 287–312.
24.
Grajo L. Occupational adaptation as a normative and intervention process – new perspectives on Schkade and Schultz’s professional legacy. In: Grajo L, Boisselle AK, editors. Adaptation through occupation: Multidimensional perspectives. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2018.
25.
Grajo L, Boisselle AK, DaLomba E. Occupational adaptation as as construct: a scoping review of literature. Open J Occup Therapy. 2018;6(1).
26.
Kitchens RF. Dissertation: occupational adaptation in a stroke selfmanagement-program. 2018.
27.
Grajo L. Theory of occupational adaptation. In: Boyt-Schell BA, Gillen G, editors. Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2019. pp. 633–42.
28.
Allen CK, Blue T. Cognitive disabilities model: How to make clinical judgments. In: Katz N, editor. Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 1988. pp. 225–80.
29.
Levy L, Burns T. Cognitive disabilities reconsidered: rehabilitation of older adults with dementia. In: Katz N, editor. Cognition and occupation across the life span: models for intervention in occupational therapy. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 2005. pp. 347–89.
30.
McCraith C, Austin D, Earhart SL. The cognitive disabilities model. In: Katz N, editor. Cognition, occupation, and participation across the life span. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press; 2011. p. 385.
31.
Allen CK, Austin D, Earhart CA, David SK, McCraith SL, Riska-Williams L. Manual for the ACLS-5 and LACLS-5. 2007.
32.
McCraith DB, Earhart CA. Cognitive disabilities model: creating fit between functional cognitive abilities and cognitive activity demands. In: Katz N, Toglia J, editors. Cognition, occupation, and participation across the life span. 4th edition. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association; 2018. pp. 469–97, 92.
33.
Op de Beeck B. Het Cognitive Disabilities (-reconsidered) Model. 2011.
34.
Wilcock A, Townsend E. Occupational justice. In: Crepeau EB, Cohn ES, Schell BAB, editors. Willard & Spackman’s Occupational Therapy. 11th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
35.
Wilcock A, Townsend E. Occupational terminology interactive dialogue. J Occup Sci. 2000;7(2):84–6.
36.
Whiteford G, Towsend E, Bryanton O, Wicks A, Pereira R. The participatory occupational justice framework: salience across contexts. In: Sakellariou D, Pollard N, editors. Occupational therapy without borders: integrating justice and inclusion with practice. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 163–74.
37.
Kronenberg F, Simo Algado S, Pollard N. Occupational therapy without borders Spirit of survivors. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2015.
38.
Kronenberg F, Pollard N, Sakellariou D. Occupational therapies without borders. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.
39.
Whiteford G, Jones K, Rahal C, Suleman A. The participatory occupational justice framework as a tool for change: three contrasting case narratives. J Occup Sci. 2018;25(4):497–508.CrossRef
40.
Townsend EA, Polatajko HJ. Enabling occupation II: advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation. Ottowa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2007.
41.
Benjamin-Thomas TE, Rudman DL. A critical interpretive synthesis: use of the occupational justice framework in research. Aust Occup Ther J. 2018;65(1):3–14.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Lo Bartolo L, Sheahan M. Industrial relations reform and the occupational transition of Australian work: a critical discourse analysis. Work. 2009;32(4):407–15.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Dsouza SA, Galvaan R, Ramugondo EL. Concepts in occupational therapy Understanding Southern Perspectives. India: Manipal univeristy press; 2017.
44.
Agree EM, Freedman VA, Cornman JC, Wolf DA, Marcotte JE. Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: when does assistive technology take the place of personal care? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60(5):S272–80.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Duncan M, Watson R. Transformation through occupation: towards a prototype. In: Watson R, Swartz L, editors. Transformation through occupation. London & Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers; 2004.
46.
Galvaan R. Occupational choice: The significance of socio‐economic and political factors. Occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. 2012:152–62.
47.
48.
Krenzer M. Alternatives to Development: In light of the Occupation-based Community Development Framework. Paper presented at the Occupational Science Europe Conference, 8–9 September 2017; Hildesheim, Germany.
49.
Galvaan R, Peters L. Occupation-based community development: confronting the politics of occupation. In: Pollard N, Sakelerious D, editors. Occupation therapy without Borders: Integrating justice with practice. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2017. pp. 283–91.
50.
Town UoC. Social responsiveness report. Cape Town; 2015.
51.
Grosfoguel R. The epistemic decolonial turn: beyond political-economy paradigms. Cult Stud. 2007;21(2–3):211–23.CrossRef
52.
Galvaan R. Embracing an occupational perspective to promoting learning in context: part 2. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2015;29(3):281–93.
53.
Zinkstok R, Dickson R, Dubois B, Engelen A, Johansson A, Schiller S, editors. Guidelines for community development in occupational therapy. COTEC Congress of Occupational Therapy; 2012; Stockholm.
54.
55.
Henderson P, Summer S, Raj T. Developing Healthier communities: an introductory course for people using community development approaches to improve health and tackle health inequalities. UK: Health Development Agency; 2004.
56.
Barr A, Hashagen S. ABCD Handbook. A framework for evaluating community development. London: CDF Publications; 2000.
57.
Melville A. Perceptions of occupational therapists in the United Kingdom on the community development framework (Zinkstok et al. 2018). Brunel University London; 2018.
Metagegevens
Titel
Overige occupation-based ergotherapiemodellen en frameworks
Auteurs
Anne-Mie Engelen, MSc
Mieke le Granse, MSc
Inka Logister-Proost
Copyright
2023
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Grondslagen van ergotherapie

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-2828-4

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-2829-1

Copyright: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-2829-1_22