Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This qualitative study examined foster parents’ perceptions of the initial transition period in order to better understand the family formation process that occurs when a new placement is transitioned into the home. A snowball sampling method was used to recruit ten foster parents to participate. A constant comparative analysis of interview transcripts guided by grounded theory approaches yielded a model of the foster family transition process that identified three main tasks: establishing trust and a sense of belonging; re-establishing family homeostasis; and working with external stakeholders. Responsive, trauma-sensitive care; realistic expectations; parenting skills; and access to resources facilitated foster family movement through the transition process. While foster families shared many of the same tasks as other family forms adding a new member, unique aspects of the foster family context were identified. Foster families often form with an incomplete knowledge of the new family member’s medical and trauma history and under the oversight of the social service system. Unlike other family types, permanence is not the primary objective of foster family formation. Study findings have implications for foster parent training and support during the transition of a new placement and affirm the value of including foster parents’ perspectives in research.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Brown, J. D., Anderson, L., & Rodgers, J. (2015). Resource workers’ relationships with foster parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies. Online first. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0204-9.
Brown, J. D., & Campbell, M. (2007). Foster parent perceptions of placement success. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(8), 1010–1020. CrossRef
Christenson, B., & McMurtry, J. (2007). A comparative evaluation of preservice training of kinship and nonkinship foster/adoptive families. Child Welfare, 86(2), 125–140. PubMed
Cooley, M. E., & Petren, R. E. (2011). Foster parent perceptions of competency: implications for foster parent training. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1968–1974. CrossRef
Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2012). Normative family transitions, couple relationship quality, and healthy child development. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: growing diversity and complexity. 4th edn. (pp. 428–451). New York: Guilford Press.
Daniel, E. (2011). Gentle iron will: foster parents’ perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 910–917. CrossRef
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92.
Fernandez, E. (2009). Children’s well-being in care: evidence from a longitudinal study of outcomes. Child and Youth Services Review, 31, 1092–1100. CrossRef
Fox, A., Berrick, J. D., & Frasch, K. (2008). Safety, family, permanency, and child well-being: what we can learn from children. Child Welfare, 87(1), 63–90. PubMed
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs. forcing. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Kids count (2011). Data snapshot on foster care placement. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/AECF-DataSnapshotOnFosterCarePlacement-2011.pdf#page=1.
Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J. A., Fisher, P. A., & Vostanis, P. (2012). Practitioner review: children in foster care—vulnerabilities and evidence-based interventions that promote resilience processes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(12), 1197–1211. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02594. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Noonan, K., Rubin, D., Makonnen, R., Zlotnik, S., & O’Reilly, A. (2009). Securing child safety, well-being, and permanency through placement stability in foster care. Evidence to Action, 1 retrieved from http://stoneleighfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Evidence%20to%20Action%20No%201.pdf.
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144. CrossRef
Oosterman, M., Schuengel, C., Slot, N., Bullens, R., & Doreleijers, T. (2007). Disruptions in foster care: a review and meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 53–76. CrossRef
Rork, K. E., & McNeil, C. B. (2011). Evaluation of foster parent training programs: a critical review. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 33, 139–170. CrossRef
Rostill-Brookes, H., Larkin, M., Toms, A., & Churchman, C. (2011). A shared experience of fragmentation: making sense of foster placement breakdown. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16(1), 103–127. doi: 10.1177/1359104509352894.
Sanchirico, A., Lau, W. J., Jablonka, K., & Russell, S. J. (1998). Foster parent involvement in service planning: does it increase job satisfaction? Children and Youth Services Review, 20(4), 325–346. CrossRef
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
U.S. Children’s Bureau (2015). Trends in foster care and adoption. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport22.pdf.
- Foster Parent’s Perspectives Regarding the Transition of a New Placement into their Home: An Exploratory Study
Jane D. Lanigan
- Springer US