Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Depression is a significant mental health concern. There are numerous depression questionnaires, several of which can be scored onto the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Depression metric. This study expands the unified metric by linking depression subscales from the Adult Self-Report (ASR) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) to it.
An online sample of 2009 men who have sex with men (MSM) was recruited. Item factor analysis was used to evaluate the dimensionality of the aggregated measures and confirm the statistical assumptions for linking. Then, linking was conducted using equipercentile and item response theory (IRT) methods. Equipercentile linking considered varying degrees of post-smoothing. IRT-based linking used fixed-anchor calibration and separate calibration with Stocking-Lord linking constants.
All three scales were broadly unidimensional. This MSM sample had slightly higher average depression scores than the general population (mean = 54.4, SD = 9.6). Both linking methods provided robust, largely comparable results. Subgroup invariance held for age, race, and HIV status. Given the broad comparability across methods, the crosswalk between raw sum scores and the unified T-score metric used fixed-anchor IRT-based methods.
PROMIS provides a unified, interpretable metric for depression reporting. The results of this study allow the depression subscales from the ASR and BSI to be rescored onto the unified metric with reasonable caution. This will benefit epidemiological projects aggregating data across various measures or time points.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Fries, J. F., Bruce, B., & Cella, D. (2005). The promise of PROMIS: Using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 23(5 Suppl 39), S53–S57. PubMed
Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. CrossRef
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory—II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. CrossRef
Olino, T. M., Yu, L., McMakin, D. L., Forbes, E. E., Seeley, J. R., Lewinsohn, P. M., et al. (2013). Comparisons across depression assessment instruments in adolescence and young adulthood: An item response theory study using two linking methods. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(8), 1267–1277. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Rescorla, L. A., & Achenbach, T. M. (2004). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) for Ages 18 to 90 Years. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (3rd ed., pp. 115–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Derogatis, L. R. (1993). The Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring & procedures manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
Puckett, J. A., Newcomb, M. E., Garofalo, R., & Mustanski, B. (2016). The impact of victimization and neuroticism on mental health in young men who have sex with men: Internalized homophobia as an underlying mechanism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(193), 1–9.
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. CrossRef
Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(2), 201–210. CrossRef
Samejima, F. (2010). The general graded response model. In M. L. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (pp. 77–107). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (2000). Population invariance and the equatability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37(4), 281–306. CrossRef
Cai, L. (2010). A two-tier full-information item factor analysis model with applications. Psychometrika, 75(4), 581–612. CrossRef
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K., & Mels, G. (2010). CEFA: Comprehensive exploratory factor analysis. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 676–696. CrossRef
Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2015). flexMIRT ® : Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring (version 3.0). Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of addressing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258. CrossRef
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterization model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. CrossRef
Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D. M., & Edelen, M. O. (2012). Using logistic approximations of marginal trace lines to develop short assessments. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(1), 41–57. CrossRef
Thissen, D., Pommerich, M., Billeaud, K., & Williams, V. S. L. (1995). Item response theory for scores on tests including polytomous items with ordered responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 39–49. CrossRef
- Expanding a common metric for depression reporting: linking two scales to PROMIS® depression
Aaron J. Kaat
Michael E. Newcomb
Daniel T. Ryan
- Springer International Publishing