Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In valuing health states using generic questionnaires such as EQ-5D, there are unrevealed issues with the quality of the data collection. The aims were to describe the problems encountered during valuation and to evaluate a quality control report and subsequent retraining of interviewers in improving this valuation.
Data from the first 266 respondents in an EQ-5D-5L valuation study were used. Interviewers were trained and answered questions regarding problems during these initial interviews. Thematic analysis was used, and individual feedback was provided. After completion of 98 interviews, a first quantitative quality control (QC) report was generated, followed by a 1-day retraining program. Subsequently individual feedback was also given on the basis of follow-up QCs. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess improvements based on 7 indicators of quality as identified in the first QC and the QC conducted after a further 168 interviews.
Interviewers encountered problems in recruiting respondents. Solutions provided were: optimization of the time of interview, the use of broader networks and the use of different scripts to explain the project’s goals to respondents. For problems in interviewing process, solutions applied were: developing the technical and personal skills of the interviewers and stimulating the respondents’ thought processes. There were also technical problems related to hardware, software and internet connections. There was an improvement in all 7 indicators of quality after the second QC.
Training before and during a study, and individual feedback on the basis of a quantitative QC, can increase the validity of values obtained from generic questionnaires.
Devlin, N., Shah, K., Feng, Y., Mulhern, B., & van Hout, B. (2015). Valuing health- related quality of life: An EQ- 5D- 5L value set for England. OHE Research Paper.
Xie, F., Pullenayegum, E., Gaebel, K., Bansback, N., Bryan, S., Ohinmaa, A., et al. (2015). A time trade- off- derived value set of the EQ- 5D- 5L for Canada. Medical Care.
Augustovski, F., Rey-Ares, L., Irazola, V., Garay, O. U., Gianneo, O., Fernandez, G., et al. (2015). An EQ- 5D- 5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences. Quality of Life Research.
Ikeda, S., Shiroiwa, T., Igarashi, A., Noto, S., Fukuda, T., Saito, S., et al. (2015). Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set (in Japanese). Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 64, 47–55.
Papadimitropoulos, E. A., Elbarazi, I., Blair, I., Katsaiti, M. S., Shah, K. K., & Devlin, N. J. (2015). An investigation of the feasibility and cultural appropriateness of stated preference methods to generate EQ-5D-5L values in the United Arab Emirates. In O. O. H. E. (OHE) (Ed.).
Shah, K. K., Lloyd, A., Oppe, M., & Devlin, N. J. (2013). One-to-one versus group setting for conducting computer-assisted TTO studies: Findings from pilot studies in England and the Netherlands. The European Journal of Health Economics, 14(Suppl 1), S65–S73. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0509-9. CrossRefPubMed
Bansback, N., Hole, A. R., Mulhern, B., & Tsuchiya, A. (2014). Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: Addressing design and sampling issues. Social Science and Medicine, 114, 38–48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.026. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Morgan, D. L. (2006). Quota sampling. The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Stem, D. E., & Bozman, C. S. (1988). Respondent anxiety reduction with the randomized response technique. In M. J. Houston (Ed.), NA- advances in consumer research, vol. 15 (pp. 595–599). Association for Consumer Research.
Kaiser, W., Burow, S., Dahms, M., Lund, H., Nast, J., & Zindel, K. (1998). Interviewer effects in assessing subjective quality of life and satisfaction with care in sheltered housing. Psychiatrische Praxis, 25(3), 142–148. PubMed
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
Wee, H. L., Li, S. C., Xie, F., Zhang, X. H., Luo, N., Feeny, D., et al. (2008). Validity, feasibility and acceptability of time trade-off and standard gamble assessments in health valuation studies: a study in a multiethnic Asian population in Singapore. Value in Health, 11(Suppl 1), S3–S10. CrossRefPubMed
- Employing quality control and feedback to the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol to improve the quality of data collection
Fredrick Dermawan Purba
Joke A. M. Hunfeld
Titi Sahidah Fitriana
Sawitri S. Sadarjoen
Jan J. V. Busschbach
- Springer International Publishing