Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In this study a homophily selection hypothesis was tested against a default selection hypothesis, to answer whether preferred and realized friendships of highly aggressive boys differed. In a large peer-nomination sample, we assessed who highly overt aggressive, low prosocial boys (n = 181) nominated as friends (preferred friendships) and who among the nominated friends reciprocated the friendship (realized friendships). These preferred and realized friendships were compared with those of less aggressive (n = 1,268) and highly aggressive but also prosocial boys (bi-strategics; n = 55). Results showed that less aggressive boys preferred peers low on aggression, whereas highly aggressive and bi-strategic boys preferred peers not particular high or low on aggression. In line with default selection, highly aggressive boys ended up with aggressive peers even though that was not their preference. In general, received support proved an important determinant of highly aggressive, bi-strategic, and less aggressive boys’ preferred and realized friendships. Especially highly aggressive boys preferred emotionally supportive friends, but ended up with the least supportive peers. In sum, for friendships of highly overt aggressive boys, the evidence favors default selection over homophily selection.
Aboud, F. E., & Mendelson, M. J. (1996). Determinants of friendship selection and quality: developmental perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, & W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 87–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Adams, R. E., Bukowski, W. M., & Bagwell, C. L. (2005). Stability of aggression during early adolescence as moderated by reciprocated friendship status and friend’s aggression. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 139–145. CrossRef
Bagwell, C. L., Newcomb, A. F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1998). Preadolescent friendship and peer rejection as predictors of adult adjustment. Child Development, 69, 140–153. PubMed
Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1447–1460. CrossRef
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence − empathy = Aggression? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 191–200. CrossRef
Byrne, B. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckermann, H. J., Gest, S. D., & Gariépy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive-behavior—Peer support or peer rejection. Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. CrossRef
Deptula, D. P., & Cohen, R. (2004). Aggressive, rejected, and delinquent children and adolescents: a comparison of their friendships. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 75–104. CrossRef
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 151. CrossRef
Fallon, B. J., & Bowles, T. V. (1997). The effect of family structure and family functioning on adolescents’ perceptions of intimate time spent with parents, siblings, and peers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 25–43. CrossRef
Ham, J. V. (2000). Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends. Developmental Psychology, 36, 209–219. CrossRef
Hartup, W. (1993). Adolescents and their friends. In B. Laursen (Ed.), Close friendships during adolescence: New directions for child development (pp. 3–22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Haselager, G. J., Hartup, W., Van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. A. (1998). Similarities between friends and nonfriends in middle childhood. Child Development, 69, 1198–1208.
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132. CrossRef
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: a case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309. CrossRef
Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 170–180. CrossRef
Jang, S. J. (1999). Age-varying effects of family, school, and peers on delinquency: a multilevel modeling test of interactional theory. Criminology, 37, 643–685. CrossRef
Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in adolescents’ daily interactions with their families from ages 10 to 18: disengagement and transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744–754. CrossRef
Lindenberg, S. (1996). Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In H. Ganzeboom & S. Lindenberg (Eds.), Verklarende Sociologie. Opstellen voor Reinhard Wippler (pp. 169–184). Amsterdam: Thesis.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily and social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. CrossRef
Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Carpenter, E. M., & Newman, J. E. (2002). Social skills training as a treatment for aggressive children and adolescents: a developmental-clinical integration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 169–199. CrossRef
Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 306–347. CrossRef
Pendell, S. D. (2002). Affection in interpersonal relationships: not just “a fond or tender feeling”. Communication Yearbook, 26, 70–115. CrossRef
Poulin, F., Cillessen, A. H. N., Hubbard, J. A., Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Schwartz, D. (1997). Children’s friends and behavioral similarity in two social contexts. Social Development, 6, 224–236. CrossRef
Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Spina, S. U. (2005). Adolescent peer networks as a context for social and emotional support. Youth & Society, 36, 379–417. CrossRef
Tolson, J. M., & Urberg, K. A. (1993). Similarity between adolescent best friends. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 274–288. CrossRef
Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Tolson, J. M. (1998). Adolescent friendship selection and termination: the role of similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 703–710. CrossRef
- Do They Get What They Want or Are They Stuck With What They Can Get? Testing Homophily Against Default Selection for Friendships of Highly Aggressive Boys. The TRAILS Study
Jelle J. Sijtsema
Siegwart M. Lindenberg
- Springer US