Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

16-03-2021

Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning

Auteurs: James J. Gregory, Paul M. Werth, Clifford A. Reilly, David S. Jevsevar

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 8/2021

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the functioning of the PROMIS-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) across clinical setting, patient age, and medical complexity by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) within the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) domains. To our knowledge, no study demonstrates lack of differential item functioning (DIF) for PROMIS-GH across these populations. We hypothesize that the PROMIS-GH domains of GMH and GPH will perform similarly when compared across these populations.

Methods

Seven thousand nine hundred and seventy four complete PROMIS Global Health measures were retrospectively analyzed using the ‘Lordif’ package on the R platform. DIF was investigated for both GMH and GPH across clinical environment (Orthopedic Surgery, Family Medicine, & Internal Medicine), age group (≤ 53, > 53–66, > 66), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI:0, CCI:1, CCI:2 +) using quasi Monte Carlo estimation. To assess the significance of DIF, Wald tests were used with the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure.

Results

No items contained in the GMH or GPH demonstrated DIF across age groups, medical complexity, or clinical environment.

Conclusion

Items assessing the domains of GMH and GPH within the PROMIS–GH function comparably across treatment setting, age category, and medical comorbidities. The PROMIS–Global Health holds potential to facilitate interdisciplinary patient care and patient optimization prior to surgical intervention.

vorige artikel The patient journey to diagnosis and treatment of congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency

volgende artikel Development and validation of a short version of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life questionnaire: the SF-SarQoL

Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18(7), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lyman, S., & Hidaka, C. (2016). Patient-Reported Outcome Measures-What Data Do We Really Need? Journal of Arthroplasty, 31(6), 1144–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.073CrossRef

Lapin, B. R., Thompson, N. R., Schuster, A., & Katzan, I. L. (2019). Patient versus proxy response on global health scales: no meaningful DIFference. Quality of Life Research, 28(6), 1585–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02130-yCrossRefPubMed

Hays, R. D., Calderon, J. L., Spritzer, K. L., Reise, S. P., & Paz, S. H. (2018). Differential item functioning by language on the PROMIS((R)) physical functioning items for children and adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 27(1), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1691-5CrossRefPubMed

Liegl, G., Rose, M., Knebel, F., Stengel, A., Buttgereit, F., Obbarius, A., et al. (2020). Using subdomain-specific item sets affected PROMIS Physical Function scores differently in cardiology and rheumatology patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.003CrossRefPubMed

Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., de Vet, H. C., Dekker, J., Westhovens, R., van Leeuwen, J., et al. (2014). Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Quality of Life Research, 23(6), 1733–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0611-6CrossRefPubMed

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Patient-reported outcomes following elective primary total hip and/or total knee arthroplasty: Hospital-level performance measure(s). http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/Measure-Methodology.html. Accessed 08/20/2020 2020.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/cjr. Accessed 08/20 2020.

10.

Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S1–S2. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000260537.45076.74CrossRef

12.

. PROMIS Global Scoring Manual (2017). GLOBAL HEALTH - A brief guide to the PROMIS Global Health instruments: (pp. 1–18): Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systme (PROMIS).

13.

Liu, H., Cella, D., Gershon, R., Shen, J., Morales, L. S., Riley, W., et al. (2010). Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v039.i08CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Jolley, L., & van Belle, G. (2006). Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar. Med Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S115-123. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245183.28384.edCrossRefPubMed

16.

Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2016). Logistic ordinal regression differential item functioning using IRT, version 0.3–3.

17.

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S22-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04CrossRefPubMed

18.

Crins, M. H. P., Terwee, C. B., Ogreden, O., Schuller, W., Dekker, P., Flens, G., et al. (2019). Differential item functioning of the PROMIS physical function, pain interference, and pain behavior item banks across patients with different musculoskeletal disorders and persons from the general population. Quality of Life Research, 28(5), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2087-xCrossRefPubMed

19.

Bierman, A. S., Bubolz, T. A., Fisher, E. S., & Wasson, J. H. (1999). How well does a single question about health predict the financial health of Medicare managed care plans? Effective Clinical Practice, 2(2), 56–62.PubMed

20.

Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Thompson, W. W., & Cella, D. (2015). U.S. General Population Estimate for “Excellent” to “Poor” Self-Rated Health Item. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(10), 1511–1516.CrossRef

21.

Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.CrossRef

22.

Blumenthal, K. J., Chang, Y., Ferris, T. G., Spirt, J. C., Vogeli, C., Wagle, N., et al. (2017). Using a Self-Reported Global Health Measure to Identify Patients at High Risk for Future Healthcare Utilization. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(8), 877–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4041-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Ali, A., Lindstrand, A., Sundberg, M., & Flivik, G. (2017). Preoperative Anxiety and Depression Correlate With Dissatisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study of 186 Patients, With 4-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(3), 767–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.033CrossRef

24.

Edwards, R. R., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Smith, M. T., Klick, B., & Katz, J. N. (2009). Catastrophizing and depressive symptoms as prospective predictors of outcomes following total knee replacement. Pain Research & Management, 14(4), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/273783CrossRef

25.

Fisher, D. A., Dierckman, B., Watts, M. R., & Davis, K. (2007). Looks good but feels bad: factors that contribute to poor results after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty, 22(6 Suppl 2), 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.011CrossRef

26.

Ayers, D. C., Franklin, P. D., Trief, P. M., Ploutz-Snyder, R., & Freund, D. (2004). Psychological attributes of preoperative total joint replacement patients: implications for optimal physical outcome. Journal of Arthroplasty, 19(7 Suppl 2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.019CrossRef

27.

Franklin, P. D., Li, W., & Ayers, D. C. (2008). The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: functional outcome after total knee replacement varies with patient attributes. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(11), 2597–2604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0428-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Lavallee, D. C., Chenok, K. E., Love, R. M., Petersen, C., Holve, E., Segal, C. D., et al. (2016). Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Health Care To Engage Patients And Enhance Care. Health Aff (Millwood), 35(4), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362CrossRef

Titel: Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning
Auteurs: James J. Gregory
Paul M. Werth
Clifford A. Reilly
David S. Jevsevar
Publicatiedatum: 16-03-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02812-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2021

Prevalence and 11-year incidence of common eye diseases and their relation to health-related quality of life, mental health, and visual impairment

Quality of life following adult veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review

Psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported item bank for healthcare engagement

A cross-sectional study on the determinants of health-related quality of life in the Philippines using the EQ-5D-5L

Factors predicting missing instruments in three cancer randomized clinical trials

Mental well-being of the general population: direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic, relational and health factors