Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 6/2021

27-01-2021

Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)

Auteurs: Pichitchai Atthakomol, Worapaka Manosroi, Aphiwij Mongkonkamthon, Peeradech Buranaworathitikul, Wilailak Wongcharoen, Siam Tongprasert, Tinakon Wongpakaran

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

To translate the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) which is widely used as the evaluation in healthcare and research system in wrist/hand disorder patients into Thai (Thai PRWHE) and to examine its psychometric properties.

Methods

The PRWHE was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with 292 wrist/hand musculoskeletal disorder patients. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test–retest reliability over a 7-day interval. Construct validity was evaluated using two methods: Spearman’s rank correlation of related and unrelated subscales and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was analyzed using the standardized response mean (SRM).

Results

All subscales had high Cronbach’s alpha (0.91–0.96). Evaluation of the Pain subscale found good correlations with the Thai PRWHE and the Thai version of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Thai DASH) questionnaire (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) in related dimensions. Unrelated dimensions, the Total Function subscale of the Thai PRWHE, and the Mobility subscale of the Thai EQ-5D-5L had a weak correlation (r = 0.09, P < 0.12). Comparison of the one-factor solution and the bifactor model found the first-order three-factor solution fitted the data better than other models. The test–retest reliability with 61 patients in each subscale revealed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.94–0.96). In the assessment of responsiveness, the SRM with 54 patients was large (0.94).

Conclusions

The Thai PRWHE has excellent internal consistency in all modules and good construct validity and reliability for Thai patients and provides a large standardized response mean after treatment.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
4.
go back to reference Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., & Bombardier, C. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 602–608. CrossRef Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., & Bombardier, C. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 602–608. CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wright, R. W. (2009). Knee injury outcomes measures. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 17(1), 31–39. CrossRef Wright, R. W. (2009). Knee injury outcomes measures. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 17(1), 31–39. CrossRef
11.
go back to reference MacDermid, J. C. (1996). Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. Journal of Hand Therapy, 9(2), 178–183. CrossRef MacDermid, J. C. (1996). Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. Journal of Hand Therapy, 9(2), 178–183. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference da Silva Rodrigues, E. K., De Cassia Registro Fonseca, M., & MacDermid, J. C. (2015). Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. Journal of Hand Surgery, 28(1), 69–75. da Silva Rodrigues, E. K., De Cassia Registro Fonseca, M., & MacDermid, J. C. (2015). Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. Journal of Hand Surgery, 28(1), 69–75.
16.
go back to reference Wilcke, M. T., Abbaszadegan, H., & Adolphson, P. Y. (2009). Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 43(2), 94–101. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0284431090273459​8. CrossRefPubMed Wilcke, M. T., Abbaszadegan, H., & Adolphson, P. Y. (2009). Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 43(2), 94–101. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​0284431090273459​8. CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference MacDermid, J. C., Richards, R. S., Donner, A., Bellamy, N., & Roth, J. H. (2000). Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume), 25(2), 330–340. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1053/​jhsu.​2000.​jhsu25a0330. CrossRef MacDermid, J. C., Richards, R. S., Donner, A., Bellamy, N., & Roth, J. H. (2000). Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume), 25(2), 330–340. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1053/​jhsu.​2000.​jhsu25a0330. CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Dorcas Beaton, C. B., Francis, G., & Marcos, B. F. (2007). Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. © Institute for Work & Health Dorcas Beaton, C. B., Francis, G., & Marcos, B. F. (2007). Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. © Institute for Work & Health
26.
go back to reference Cronbach, L. J. (1946). A case study of the split-half reliability coefficient. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(8), 473–480. CrossRef Cronbach, L. J. (1946). A case study of the split-half reliability coefficient. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(8), 473–480. CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Pattanaphesaj, J. (2014). Health-related quality of life measure (EQ-5D-5L): Measurement property testing and tis preference-based score in Thai population (doctoral dissertion). Mahidol University, Pattanaphesaj, J. (2014). Health-related quality of life measure (EQ-5D-5L): Measurement property testing and tis preference-based score in Thai population (doctoral dissertion). Mahidol University,
33.
go back to reference Hu, L. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. CrossRef Hu, L. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hu, L. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef Hu, L. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (1st ed.). New York: The Guildford Press. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (1st ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.
36.
go back to reference Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group LLC. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group LLC.
38.
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
go back to reference Machin, D. C. M., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2009). Sample size tables for clinical studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Machin, D. C. M., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2009). Sample size tables for clinical studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
go back to reference Kim, J. K., & Kang, J. S. (2013). Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 238–243. CrossRef Kim, J. K., & Kang, J. S. (2013). Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 238–243. CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hasani, F. N., MacDermid, J. C., Tang, A., & Kho, M. E. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE-A) in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28(4), 412–419. CrossRef Hasani, F. N., MacDermid, J. C., Tang, A., & Kho, M. E. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE-A) in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28(4), 412–419. CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Packham, T., & MacDermid, J. C. (2013). Measurement properties of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 216–223. CrossRef Packham, T., & MacDermid, J. C. (2013). Measurement properties of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 216–223. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)
Auteurs
Pichitchai Atthakomol
Worapaka Manosroi
Aphiwij Mongkonkamthon
Peeradech Buranaworathitikul
Wilailak Wongcharoen
Siam Tongprasert
Tinakon Wongpakaran
Publicatiedatum
27-01-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02760-1