Top

Gepubliceerd in:

27-01-2021

Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)

Auteurs: Pichitchai Atthakomol, Worapaka Manosroi, Aphiwij Mongkonkamthon, Peeradech Buranaworathitikul, Wilailak Wongcharoen, Siam Tongprasert, Tinakon Wongpakaran

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2021

Abstract

Purpose

To translate the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) which is widely used as the evaluation in healthcare and research system in wrist/hand disorder patients into Thai (Thai PRWHE) and to examine its psychometric properties.

Methods

The PRWHE was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with 292 wrist/hand musculoskeletal disorder patients. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test–retest reliability over a 7-day interval. Construct validity was evaluated using two methods: Spearman’s rank correlation of related and unrelated subscales and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was analyzed using the standardized response mean (SRM).

Results

All subscales had high Cronbach’s alpha (0.91–0.96). Evaluation of the Pain subscale found good correlations with the Thai PRWHE and the Thai version of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Thai DASH) questionnaire (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) in related dimensions. Unrelated dimensions, the Total Function subscale of the Thai PRWHE, and the Mobility subscale of the Thai EQ-5D-5L had a weak correlation (r = 0.09, P < 0.12). Comparison of the one-factor solution and the bifactor model found the first-order three-factor solution fitted the data better than other models. The test–retest reliability with 61 patients in each subscale revealed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.94–0.96). In the assessment of responsiveness, the SRM with 54 patients was large (0.94).

Conclusions

The Thai PRWHE has excellent internal consistency in all modules and good construct validity and reliability for Thai patients and provides a large standardized response mean after treatment.

vorige artikel Translation and psychometric validation of the traditional Chinese version of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pediatric-25 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS-25) in Chinese Children with Cancer in Hong Kong

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Chung, K. C., Pillsbury, M. S., Walters, M. R., & Hayward, R. A. (1998). Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. Journal of Hand Surgery, 23(4), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7.CrossRef

Kotsis, S. V., Lau, F. H., & Chung, K. C. (2007). Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment. Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume), 32(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.10.003.CrossRef

Tongprasert, S., Rapipong, J., & Buntragulpoontawee, M. (2014). The cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH questionnaire in Thai (DASH-TH). Journal of Hand Therapy, 27(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2013.08.020.CrossRefPubMed

Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., & Bombardier, C. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 602–608.CrossRef

MacDermid, J. C., Turgeon, T., Richards, R. S., Beadle, M., & Roth, J. H. (1998). Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: A reliable and valid measurement tool. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 12(8), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199811000-00009.CrossRefPubMed

Rosales, R. S., Delgado, E. B., & Diez de la Lastra-Bosch, I. (2002). Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: Cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume), 27(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2002.30059.CrossRef

Wright, R. W. (2009). Knee injury outcomes measures. Journal of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 17(1), 31–39.CrossRef

Smith, M. V., Calfee, R. P., Baumgarten, K. M., Brophy, R. H., & Wright, R. W. (2012). Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 94(3), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01744.CrossRef

Bradham, D. D. (1994). Outcomes research in orthopedics: History, perspectives, concepts, and future. Arthroscopy, 10(5), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80003-9.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Mellstrand Navarro, C., Ponzer, S., Tornkvist, H., Ahrengart, L., & Bergstrom, G. (2011). Measuring outcome after wrist injury: Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 171. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

MacDermid, J. C. (1996). Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. Journal of Hand Therapy, 9(2), 178–183.CrossRef

12.

da Silva Rodrigues, E. K., De Cassia Registro Fonseca, M., & MacDermid, J. C. (2015). Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity. Journal of Hand Surgery, 28(1), 69–75.

13.

Mehta, S. P., Mhatre, B., MacDermid, J. C., & Mehta, A. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Hindi version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Journal of Hand Therapy, 25(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2011.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Wah, J. W., Wang, M. K., & Ping, C. L. (2006). Construct validity of the Chinese version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE-Hong Kong Version). Journal of Hand Therapy, 19(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2005.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Hemelaers, L., Angst, F., Drerup, S., Simmen, B. R., & Wood-Dauphinee, S. (2008). Reliability and validity of the German version of “the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)” as an outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in patients with acute distal radius fractures. Journal of Hand Therapy, 21(4), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2008.03.002.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Wilcke, M. T., Abbaszadegan, H., & Adolphson, P. Y. (2009). Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 43(2), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310902734598.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Imaeda, T., Uchiyama, S., Wada, T., Okinaga, S., Sawaizumi, T., Omokawa, S., et al. (2010). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 15(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1477-x.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Schonnemann, J. O., Hansen, T. B., & Soballe, K. (2013). Translation and validation of the Danish version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, 47(6), 489–492. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2013.787934.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sandelin, H., Jalanko, T., Huhtala, H., Lassila, H., Haapala, J., & Helkamaa, T. (2016). Translation and validation of the finnish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation questionnaire (PRWE) in patients with acute distal radius fracture. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 105(3), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496915613649.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rosales, R. S., Garcia-Gutierrez, R., Reboso-Morales, L., & Atroshi, I. (2017). The Spanish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome measure: Cross-cultural adaptation process, reliability, measurement error and construct validity. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 15(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0745-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

MacDermid, J. C., & Tottenham, V. (2004). Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. Journal of Hand Therapy, 17(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2003.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

22.

MacDermid, J. C., Richards, R. S., Donner, A., Bellamy, N., & Roth, J. H. (2000). Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. Journal of Hand Surgery (American Volume), 25(2), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu25a0330.CrossRef

23.

Dorcas Beaton, C. B., Francis, G., & Marcos, B. F. (2007). Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. © Institute for Work & Health

24.

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.CrossRefPubMed

25.

von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., et al. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet, 370(9596), 1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.CrossRef

26.

Cronbach, L. J. (1946). A case study of the split-half reliability coefficient. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37(8), 473–480.CrossRef

27.

Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Buntragulpoontawee, M., Phutrit, S., Tongprasert, S., Wongpakaran, T., & Khunachiva, J. (2018). Construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Thai version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-TH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Research Notes, 11(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3318-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Pattanaphesaj, J. (2014). Health-related quality of life measure (EQ-5D-5L): Measurement property testing and tis preference-based score in Thai population (doctoral dissertion). Mahidol University,

31.

Pattanaphesaj, J., & Thavorncharoensap, M. (2015). Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to EQ-5D-3L in the Thai diabetes patients. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 13, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0203-3.CrossRef

32.

Sakthong, P., Sonsa-Ardjit, N., Sukarnjanaset, P., & Munpan, W. (2015). Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in Thai patients with chronic diseases. Quality of Life Research, 24(12), 3015–3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1038-z.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Hu, L. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.CrossRef

34.

Hu, L. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef

35.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (1st ed.). New York: The Guildford Press.

36.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis Group LLC.

37.

Stratford, P. W., Binkley, J. M., & Riddle, D. L. (1996). Health status measures: Strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Physical Therapy, 76(10), 1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.10.1109.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

39.

Machin, D. C. M., Tan, S. B., & Tan, S. H. (2009). Sample size tables for clinical studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

40.

Kim, J. K., & Kang, J. S. (2013). Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 238–243.CrossRef

41.

Hasani, F. N., MacDermid, J. C., Tang, A., & Kho, M. E. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of the Arabic version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation (PRWHE-A) in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28(4), 412–419.CrossRef

42.

Oke Topcu, D., & Ikbali Afsar, S. (2019). Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation questionnaire. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 49(2), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1806-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Vastamaki, M., Ristolainen, L., Vastamaki, H., Laimi, K., & Saltychev, M. (2018). Validity and internal consistency of the Helsinki Serratus Palsy Index for patients with serratus palsy. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 27(7), 1185–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.010.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Briggs, S. R. C., & Jonathan, M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x.CrossRef

45.

Brink, S. M., Voskamp, E. G., Houpt, P., & Emmelot, C. H. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation-Dutch Language Version (PRWH/E-DLV). Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 34(4), 556–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193409103733.CrossRef

46.

Farzad, M., MacDermid, J. C., Asgary, A., Shafiee, E., & Azizi, H. (2019). The patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation was successfully translated to Persian. Journal of Hand Therapy, 32(4), 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2018.09.002.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Fairplay, T., Atzei, A., Corradi, M., Luchetti, R., Cozzolino, R., & Schoenhuber, R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation questionnaire. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 37(9), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193412445160.CrossRef

48.

El Moumni, M., Van Eck, M. E., Wendt, K. W., Reininga, I. H., & Mokkink, L. B. (2016). Structural validity of the Dutch Version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-NL) in patients with hand and wrist injuries. Physical Therapy, 96(6), 908–916. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140589.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Packham, T., & MacDermid, J. C. (2013). Measurement properties of the Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation: Rasch analysis of responses from a traumatic hand injury population. Journal of Hand Therapy, 26(3), 216–223.CrossRef

Titel: Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)
Auteurs: Pichitchai Atthakomol
Worapaka Manosroi
Aphiwij Mongkonkamthon
Peeradech Buranaworathitikul
Wilailak Wongcharoen
Siam Tongprasert
Tinakon Wongpakaran
Publicatiedatum: 27-01-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02760-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2021

Longitudinal change of quality of life in the first five years of survival among disease-free Chinese breast cancer survivors

Association between frequency of laughter and oral health among community-dwelling older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study in Japan

COVID-19 pandemic reduces the negative perception of oral health-related quality of life in adolescents

Translation and psychometric validation of the traditional Chinese version of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pediatric-25 Profile version 2.0 (PROMIS-25) in Chinese Children with Cancer in Hong Kong

Demographic and functional differences among social security disability claimants

Quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes after switching to insulin degludec: results from a cross-sectional survey