Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Outcomes research in orthopedics: History, perspectives, concepts, and future
References (20)
- et al.
Small area variations in health care delivery. American Association for the Advancement of Science
Science
(1973) - et al.
Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care
JAMA
(1991) - et al.
Relation between surgical volume and incidence of postoperative wound infection
N Engl J Med
(1981) - et al.
Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality
N Engl J Med
(1979) - et al.
Hospital volume, physician volume, and patient outcomes: assessing the evidence
(1990) The outcomes movement—will it get us where we want to go? Sounding board
N Engl J Med
(1990)Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring, vol I: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment
(1980)Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring, vol II: the criteria and standards of quality
(1982)Assessing and improving health care outcomes: the health accounting approach to quality assurance
- et al.
Late results after menisectomy
J Bone Joint Surg
(1969)
Cited by (15)
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Foot and Ankle Surgery
2018, Orthopedic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :In 1992, Ware and Sherbourne15 designed and introduced a 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to measure overall patient-reported health status across 8 domains, including physical functioning, general mental health, and social functioning. In 1994, Douglas Bradham16 adapted Tarlov and colleagues’ conceptual model for orthopedics by emphasizing continuity of care over the long term with outcomes informing future care via feedback loops and by focusing primarily on functional outcome measures. Although much of the focus of practice guidelines and appropriate use criteria is on process metrics (eg, administration of perioperative antibiotics, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and so forth), increasing attention is being paid to the importance of measuring outcomes.
Editorial Commentary: Postoperative Outcomes—Are We Asking the Right Questions? Shoulder Arthroscopy Patient Quality of Life Correlates With Joint-Specific Outcome and Is Predicated on Patient Expectation
2017, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryValidity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems
2024, Evaluation and the Health ProfessionsThe German version of the Nottingham Clavicle Score is a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate patients with clavicle and acromioclavicular pathologies
2023, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, ArthroscopyChoosing patient-reported outcome measures for shoulder pathology
2021, EFORT Open Reviews