Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C) is a systematic and comprehensive needs assessment tool for the family caregivers. The purpose of this project was twofold: (1) to adapt the CNAT-C to Mainland China’s cultural context and (2) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese CNAT-C.
Cross-cultural adaptation of the original CNAT-C was performed according to published guidelines. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 30 Chinese family cancer caregivers. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 205 Chinese cancer caregivers from Mainland China. Construct validity was determined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was determined using internal consistency and test–retest reliability.
The split-half coefficient for the overall Chinese CNAT-C scale was 0.77. Principal component analysis resulted in an eight-factor structure explaining 68.11 % of the total variance. The comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.91 from the modified model confirmatory factor analysis. The Chi-square divided by degrees of freedom was 1.98, and the root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.079. In relation to the known-group validation, significant differences were found in the Chinese CNAT-C scale according to various caregiver characteristics. Internal consistency was high for the Chinese CNAT-C reaching a Cronbach α value of 0.94. Test–retest reliability was 0.85.
The newly adapted Chinese CNAT-C scale possesses adequate validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency and therefore may be used to ascertain holistic health and support needs of cancer patients’ family caregivers in Mainland China.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. (2014). GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_population.aspx. Accessed 19 Dec 2013.
American Cancer Society. (2013). Cancer facts & figures 2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
Tringali, C. A. (1986). The needs of family members of cancer patients. Oncology Nursing Forum, 13, 65–70. PubMed
Li, Q.-P. (2012). Research status of the cancer family caregivers. Journal of Nursing, 47, 1132–1134.
Dl, F. (2002). Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25, 3186–3191. CrossRef
Hh, H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Batista-Foguet, J. M., Coenders, G., & Alonso, J. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis. Its role on the validation of health related questionnaires. Med Clin (Barc), 122(Suppl 1), 21–27. CrossRef
Given, B. A., Given, C. W., & Kozachik, S. (2001). Family support in advanced cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 51, 213–231. CrossRef
Lyons, R. A., Wareham, K., Lucas, M., Price, D., Williams, J., & Hutchings, H. A. (1999). SF-36 Scores vary by method of administration: Implications for study design. Journal of Public Health, 21(1), 41–45. CrossRef
Weitzner, M. A., Jacobsen, P. B., Wagner, H., Friedland, J., & Cox, C. (1999). The caregiver quality of life index-cancer (CQOLC) scale: Development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8, 55–63. PubMedCrossRef
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the comprehensive needs assessment tool for cancer caregivers (CNAT-C)
- Springer International Publishing