Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This research was funded by a grant (431-09-030) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) awarded to Dr. Goossens and Dr. Vermande
Whereas previous research has shown that bullying in youth is predictive of a range of negative outcomes later in life, the more proximal consequences of bullying in the context of the peer group at school are not as clear. The present three-wave longitudinal study followed children (N = 394; 53 % girls; M age = 10.3 at Time 1) from late childhood into early adolescence. Joint trajectory analyses were used to examine the dynamic prospective relations between bullying on the one hand, and indices tapping perceived popularity, peer-reported social acceptance, self-perceived social competence, and internalizing symptoms on the other. Results show that although young bullies may be on a developmental path that in the long run becomes problematic, from the bullies’ perspective in the shorter term personal advantages outweigh disadvantages. High bullying is highly positively related to high social status as indexed by perceived popularity. Although bullies are not very high in peer-rated social acceptance, most are not very low either. Moreover, bullies do not demonstrate elevated internalizing symptoms, or problems in the social domain as indexed by self-perceived social competence. As bullying yields clear personal benefits for the bullies without strong costs, the findings underscore the need for interventions targeting mechanisms that reward bullying (198 words).
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Turgeon, L., Poulin, F., & Wanner, B. (2004). Is there a dark side of positive illusions? overestimation of social competence and subsequent adjustment in aggressive and non-aggressive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 302–320. CrossRef
Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L., Moffitt, C., Umetoto, L. A., & Francis, S. E. (2000). Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 835–855.
Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83. CrossRef
Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., & Dekker, P. (2006). The new participant role scales: A comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343–357. CrossRef
Harter, S. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87–97. CrossRef
Hawley, P.H., Stump, K.N., & Ratliff, J.M. (2010). Sidestepping the jingle fallacy: Bullying, aggression, and the importance of knowing the difference. In D. Espelage & S. Swearer, Bullying in American Schools (pp. 101–115). Rutledge.
Huberman, B. A., Loch, C. A., & Őnçűler, A. (2004). Status a s a valued resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 103–114. CrossRef
Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2005). Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables. Psychological Methods, 15, 281–299. CrossRef
Maassen, G. H., Akkermans, W., & van der Linden, J. L. (1996). Two- dimensional sociometric status determination with rating scales. Small Group Research, 27, 56–78. CrossRef
Muris, P., Meesters, C., & Schouten, E. (2002). A brief questionnaire of DSM-IV defined anxiety and depression symptoms among children. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9, 430–442. CrossRef
Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). MPlus User’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modelling of development over the life course. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2008). Bullying and the need to belong: Early adolescents’ bullying-related behavior and the acceptance they desire and receive from particular classmates. Social Development, 17, 24–46.
Olweus, D. (1991). Bully-victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. CrossRef
Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Connolly, J., Yuile, A., & Jiang, D. (2006). A developmental perspective on bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 376–384. CrossRef
Roland, E., & Idsoe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 446–462. CrossRef
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (2010). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national anti-bullying program, KiVa. In B. Doll, W. Pfol, & J. S. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science (pp. 240–254). New York: Routledge.
Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interaction, relationships, and groups (pp. 322–340). New York: Guilford.
Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747. PubMed
Sourander, A., Jensen, P., Rönning, J. A., Niemelä, S., Helenius, H., Sillanmäki, L., Kumpulainen, K., Piha, J., Tamminen, T., Moilanen, I., & Almqvist, F. (2007). What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The finnish “From a Boy to a Man” study. Pediatrics, 120, 397–404. PubMedCrossRef
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). “Bullying and theory of mind”: A critique of the social skills deficit view of anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, 117–127. CrossRef
Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Losel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011). The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: A systematic/meta analytic review of longitudinal studies. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 21, 80–89. CrossRef
Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of sex- and peer valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396–408. CrossRef
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176. CrossRef
- Costs and Benefits of Bullying in the Context of the Peer Group: A Three Wave Longitudinal Analysis
Frits A. Goossens
Rens van de Schoot
Matty van der Meulen
- Springer US