Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Article

Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues

Auteurs: Kun Guo, Claire Smith, Kathryn Powell, Kelly Nicholls

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

While viewing faces, humans often demonstrate a natural gaze bias towards the left visual field, that is, the right side of the viewee’s face is often inspected first and for longer periods. Previous studies have suggested that this gaze asymmetry is a part of the gaze pattern associated with face exploration, but its relation with perceptual processing of facial cues is unclear. In this study we recorded participants’ saccadic eye movements while exploring face images under different task instructions (free viewing, judging familiarity and judging facial expression). We observed a consistent left gaze bias in face viewing irrespective of task demands. The probability of the first fixation and the proportion of overall fixations directed at the left hemiface were indistinguishable across different task instructions or across different facial expressions. It seems that the left gaze bias is an automatic reflection of hemispheric lateralisation in face processing, and is not necessarily correlated with the perceptual processing of a specific type of facial information.
Literatuur
go back to reference Barton, J. J. S., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception, 35, 1089–1105.PubMedCrossRef Barton, J. J. S., Radcliffe, N., Cherkasova, M. V., Edelman, J., & Intriligator, J. M. (2006). Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception, 35, 1089–1105.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Borod, J. C., Haywood, C. S., & Koff, E. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychology Review, 7, 41–60.PubMedCrossRef Borod, J. C., Haywood, C. S., & Koff, E. (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychology Review, 7, 41–60.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brady, N., Campbell, M., & Flaherty, M. (2005). Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend. Brain and Cognition, 58, 334–342.PubMedCrossRef Brady, N., Campbell, M., & Flaherty, M. (2005). Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend. Brain and Cognition, 58, 334–342.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.PubMedCrossRef Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (1997). Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia, 35, 685–693.PubMedCrossRef Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (1997). Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia, 35, 685–693.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Butler, S., Gilchrist, I. D., Burt, D. M., Perrett, D. I., Jones, E., & Harvey, M. (2005). Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns? Neuropsychologia, 43, 52–59.PubMedCrossRef Butler, S., Gilchrist, I. D., Burt, D. M., Perrett, D. I., Jones, E., & Harvey, M. (2005). Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns? Neuropsychologia, 43, 52–59.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Coolican, J., Eskes, G. A., McMullen, P. A., & Lecky, E. (2008). Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion. Brain and Cognition, 66, 176–187.PubMedCrossRef Coolican, J., Eskes, G. A., McMullen, P. A., & Lecky, E. (2008). Perceptual biases in processing facial identity and emotion. Brain and Cognition, 66, 176–187.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dahl, C. D., Wallraven, C., Bulthoff, H. H., & Logothetis, N. K. (2009). Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies. Current Biology, 19, 509–513.PubMedCrossRef Dahl, C. D., Wallraven, C., Bulthoff, H. H., & Logothetis, N. K. (2009). Humans and macaques employ similar face-processing strategies. Current Biology, 19, 509–513.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Renzi, E., Perani, D., Carlesimo, G. A., Silveri, M. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere—an MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia, 8, 893–902.CrossRef De Renzi, E., Perani, D., Carlesimo, G. A., Silveri, M. C., & Fazio, F. (1994). Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere—an MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia, 8, 893–902.CrossRef
go back to reference Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495–504.PubMedCrossRef Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495–504.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gilbert, C., & Bakan, P. (1973). Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Neuropsychologia, 11, 355–362.PubMedCrossRef Gilbert, C., & Bakan, P. (1973). Visual asymmetry in perception of faces. Neuropsychologia, 11, 355–362.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45, 32–41.PubMedCrossRef Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45, 32–41.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Guo, K., Mahmoodi, S., Robertson, R. G., & Young, M. P. (2006). Longer fixation duration while viewing face images. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 91–98.CrossRef Guo, K., Mahmoodi, S., Robertson, R. G., & Young, M. P. (2006). Longer fixation duration while viewing face images. Experimental Brain Research, 171, 91–98.CrossRef
go back to reference Guo, K., Meints, K., Hall, C., Hall, S., & Mills, D. (2009). Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, 12, 409–418.PubMedCrossRef Guo, K., Meints, K., Hall, C., Hall, S., & Mills, D. (2009). Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Animal Cognition, 12, 409–418.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Guo, K., Tunnicliffe, D., & Roebuck, H. (2010). Human spontaneous gaze patterns in viewing of faces of different species. Perception, 39, 533–542.PubMedCrossRef Guo, K., Tunnicliffe, D., & Roebuck, H. (2010). Human spontaneous gaze patterns in viewing of faces of different species. Perception, 39, 533–542.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 223–233.CrossRef Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 223–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Heath, R. L., Rouhana, A., & Ghanem, D. A. (2005). Asymmetric bias in perception of facial affect among Roman and Arabic script readers. Laterality, 10, 51–64.PubMedCrossRef Heath, R. L., Rouhana, A., & Ghanem, D. A. (2005). Asymmetric bias in perception of facial affect among Roman and Arabic script readers. Laterality, 10, 51–64.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Indersmitten, T., & Gur, R. C. (2003). Emotion processing in chimeric faces: hemispheric asymmetries in expression and recognition of emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3820–3825.PubMed Indersmitten, T., & Gur, R. C. (2003). Emotion processing in chimeric faces: hemispheric asymmetries in expression and recognition of emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3820–3825.PubMed
go back to reference Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110.PubMedCrossRef Jewell, G., & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.PubMed Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.PubMed
go back to reference Kirouac, G., & Doré, F. Y. (1984). Judgment of facial expressions of emotion as a function of exposure time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 147–150.PubMedCrossRef Kirouac, G., & Doré, F. Y. (1984). Judgment of facial expressions of emotion as a function of exposure time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 147–150.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Leonards, U., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2005). Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans. Vision Research, 45, 2677–2684.PubMedCrossRef Leonards, U., & Scott-Samuel, N. E. (2005). Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans. Vision Research, 45, 2677–2684.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Luh, K. E., Rueckert, L. M., & Levy, J. (1991). Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 16, 83–103.PubMedCrossRef Luh, K. E., Rueckert, L. M., & Levy, J. (1991). Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 16, 83–103.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Malcolm, G. L., Lanyon, L. J., Fugard, A. J. B., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: An exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision, 8(8):2, 1–9. Malcolm, G. L., Lanyon, L. J., Fugard, A. J. B., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: An exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. Journal of Vision, 8(8):2, 1–9.
go back to reference Martinez, A. M., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR Face Database. CVC Technical Report #24, June 1998. Martinez, A. M., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR Face Database. CVC Technical Report #24, June 1998.
go back to reference Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., Phillips, J. G., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1993). Reversed perceptual asymmetry for faces in left unilateral neglect. Brain and Cognition, 23, 145–165.PubMedCrossRef Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., Phillips, J. G., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1993). Reversed perceptual asymmetry for faces in left unilateral neglect. Brain and Cognition, 23, 145–165.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mertens, I., Siegmund, H., & Grusser, O. J. (1993). Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task. Neuropsychologia, 31, 989–998.PubMedCrossRef Mertens, I., Siegmund, H., & Grusser, O. J. (1993). Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task. Neuropsychologia, 31, 989–998.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Murphy, F. C., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Lawrence, A. D. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of emotions: a meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 207–233.CrossRef Murphy, F. C., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Lawrence, A. D. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of emotions: a meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 207–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Nicholls, M. E. R., & Roberts, G. R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Cortex, 38, 113–136.PubMedCrossRef Nicholls, M. E. R., & Roberts, G. R. (2002). Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases? Cortex, 38, 113–136.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Niemeier, M., Stojanoski, B., & Greco, A. (2007). Influence of time and spatial frequency on the perceptual bias: evidence for competition between hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1029–1040.PubMedCrossRef Niemeier, M., Stojanoski, B., & Greco, A. (2007). Influence of time and spatial frequency on the perceptual bias: evidence for competition between hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1029–1040.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Philips, M. L., & David, A. S. (1997). Viewing strategies for simple and chimeric faces: An investigation of perceptual bias in normal and schizophrenic patients using visual scan paths. Brain and Cognition, 32, 225–238.CrossRef Philips, M. L., & David, A. S. (1997). Viewing strategies for simple and chimeric faces: An investigation of perceptual bias in normal and schizophrenic patients using visual scan paths. Brain and Cognition, 32, 225–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Rhodes, G. (1986). Perceptual asymmetries in face recognition. Brain and Cognition, 4, 197–218.CrossRef Rhodes, G. (1986). Perceptual asymmetries in face recognition. Brain and Cognition, 4, 197–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402–409.PubMedCrossRef Schyns, P. G., Bonnar, L., & Gosselin, F. (2002). Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 402–409.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vaid, J., & Singh, M. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of facial affect: Is there an influence of reading habits? Neuropsychologia, 27, 1277–1287.PubMedCrossRef Vaid, J., & Singh, M. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of facial affect: Is there an influence of reading habits? Neuropsychologia, 27, 1277–1287.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference van Belle, G., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P., & Rossion, B. (2010). Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 20.PubMed van Belle, G., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P., & Rossion, B. (2010). Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 20.PubMed
go back to reference Vinette, C., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2004). Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it’s in the eyes. Cognitive Science, 28, 289–301. Vinette, C., Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2004). Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it’s in the eyes. Cognitive Science, 28, 289–301.
go back to reference Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.PubMedCrossRef Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues
Auteurs
Kun Guo
Claire Smith
Kathryn Powell
Kelly Nicholls
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0340-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

Psychological Research 3/2012 Naar de uitgave