Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2012

01-05-2012 | Original Article

The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S–R associations or inhibition of executive control processes?

Auteurs: Rico Fischer, Franziska Plessow, Andrea Kiesel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Non-informative, task-irrelevant auditory alerting signals often lead to increased interference effects in selective attention paradigms (e.g., Simon, Eriksen flanker). Some authors conclude that the alerting attentional network, activated by the alerting signal, reveals an inhibitory influence upon the executive attentional network, resulting in attenuated executive control. Alternatively, in the present study we argue that increased interference effects might be explained by alerting signals facilitating response activation processes (i.e., the activation of established S–R links). In a modified Eriksen-flanker paradigm, we contrasted these assumptions. We used word flanker stimuli for which S–R associations were established and word flanker stimuli without S–R associations. The presence of an alerting signal increased flanker compatibility only for flanker stimuli for which S–R associations existed while flanker compatibility effects were the same for all flanker types in conditions without alerting signals. Therefore, we conclude that alerting signals enhance stimulus triggered visuo-motor response activation processes.
Voetnoten
1
We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this comparison.
 
2
It should be noted that there is a theoretical possibility to preserve the assumption that alerting signals negatively influence the executive control system. This, however, requires a number of additional assumptions. For example, one would have to assume that interference effects based on semantic analysis of the stimulus are less vulnerable to modulations by the reduced efficiency of the executive control system than interference effects based on S-R link processing. In consequence, however, this means that different stages of processing (e.g., semantic classification vs. response selection) are controlled by specialized executive control systems with specific susceptibilities to alerting signals. We thank an anonymous reviewer for mentioning this possibility.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrams, R. L., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118–124.PubMedCrossRef Abrams, R. L., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118–124.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Abrams, R. L., Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 100–106.PubMedCrossRef Abrams, R. L., Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 100–106.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein, I. H., Rose, R., & Ashe, V. (1970). Preparatory state effects in intersensory facilitation. Psychonomic Science, 19, 113–114. Bernstein, I. H., Rose, R., & Ashe, V. (1970). Preparatory state effects in intersensory facilitation. Psychonomic Science, 19, 113–114.
go back to reference Böckler, A., Alpay, G., & Stürmer, B. (2011). Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control: a Simon-task ERP study. Experimental Psychology, 58, 102–109.PubMedCrossRef Böckler, A., Alpay, G., & Stürmer, B. (2011). Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control: a Simon-task ERP study. Experimental Psychology, 58, 102–109.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control networks. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 27–37.CrossRef Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., Funes, M. J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control networks. Experimental Brain Research, 167, 27–37.CrossRef
go back to reference Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: on their independence and interactions. Brain and Cognition, 54, 225–227.PubMedCrossRef Callejas, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2004). The three attentional networks: on their independence and interactions. Brain and Cognition, 54, 225–227.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529–553.PubMedCrossRef Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529–553.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.PubMedCrossRef Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1076, 116–128.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Damian, M. F. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154–165.PubMedCrossRef Damian, M. F. (2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154–165.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’h, G., Koechlin, E., Müller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconcious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.PubMedCrossRef Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’h, G., Koechlin, E., Müller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Imaging unconcious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flanker task and response competition: a useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101–118.CrossRef Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flanker task and response competition: a useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168. Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., & O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.
go back to reference Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRef Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249–263.PubMedCrossRef Eriksen, C. W., & Schultz, D. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249–263.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.PubMedCrossRef Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327–343.PubMedCrossRef Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3, 327–343.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, R., Plessow, F., & Kiesel, A. (2010). Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 57, 89–97.PubMedCrossRef Fischer, R., Plessow, F., & Kiesel, A. (2010). Auditory warning signals affect mechanisms of response selection: evidence from a Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 57, 89–97.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, R., & Schubert, T. (2008). Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 55, 203–211.PubMedCrossRef Fischer, R., & Schubert, T. (2008). Valence processing bypassing the response selection bottleneck? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 55, 203–211.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, R., Schubert, T., & Liepelt, R. (2007). Accessory stimuli modulate effects of non-conscious priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 9–22.PubMedCrossRef Fischer, R., Schubert, T., & Liepelt, R. (2007). Accessory stimuli modulate effects of non-conscious priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 9–22.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331–344.PubMedCrossRef Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331–344.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task. Nature, 391, 786–788.PubMedCrossRef Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task. Nature, 391, 786–788.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321–329.PubMedCrossRef Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321–329.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27–45.PubMedCrossRef Hackley, S. A., & Valle-Inclán, F. (2003). Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, 64, 27–45.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-task: inhibitory executive processes? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 218–225.CrossRef Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Hennighausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksen-task: inhibitory executive processes? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 218–225.CrossRef
go back to reference Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., Band, G. P., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 847–864.PubMedCrossRef Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., Band, G. P., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2009). The effects of accessory stimuli on information processing: evidence from electrophysiology and a diffusion model analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 847–864.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kiesel, A., & Miller, J. (2007). Impact of contingency manipulations on accessory stimulus effects. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 1117–1125.PubMedCrossRef Kiesel, A., & Miller, J. (2007). Impact of contingency manipulations on accessory stimulus effects. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 1117–1125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: on the origins of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117–125.PubMedCrossRef Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: on the origins of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117–125.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 125, 307–323.PubMedCrossRef Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 125, 307–323.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.PubMedCrossRef Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Low, K. A., Larson, S. L., Burke, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1996). Alerting effects on choice reaction time and the photic eyeblink reflex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 98, 385–393.PubMedCrossRef Low, K. A., Larson, S. L., Burke, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1996). Alerting effects on choice reaction time and the photic eyeblink reflex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 98, 385–393.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Magen, H., & Cohen, A. (2002). Action-based and vision-based selection of input: two sources of control. Psychological Research, 66(4), 247–259.PubMedCrossRef Magen, H., & Cohen, A. (2002). Action-based and vision-based selection of input: two sources of control. Psychological Research, 66(4), 247–259.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mattler, U. (2005). Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, 577–601. Mattler, U. (2005). Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, 577–601.
go back to reference Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 121, 195–209.PubMedCrossRef Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 121, 195–209.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.PubMedCrossRef Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., & Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 597–611.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to non-reportable masked stimuli: where is the limit of direct motor specification? In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 123–150). Cambridge: MIT Press. Neumann, O., & Klotz, W. (1994). Motor responses to non-reportable masked stimuli: where is the limit of direct motor specification? In C. Umiltá & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 123–150). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.CrossRef Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.CrossRef
go back to reference Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292–1312.PubMedCrossRef Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292–1312.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Osman, A., Moore, C. M., & Ulrich, R. (1995). Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychologica, 90, 111–127.CrossRef Osman, A., Moore, C. M., & Ulrich, R. (1995). Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychologica, 90, 111–127.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale: Earlbaum. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391–408.CrossRef Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391–408.CrossRef
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.CrossRef Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385–408.PubMedCrossRef Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385–408.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006). Typologies of attentional networks. Nature Review Neuroscience, 7, 367–379.CrossRef Raz, A., & Buhle, J. (2006). Typologies of attentional networks. Nature Review Neuroscience, 7, 367–379.CrossRef
go back to reference Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 522–526.PubMedCrossRef Rolke, B., & Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 522–526.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sanders, A. F., & Lamers, J. M. (2002). The Eriksen-flanker effect revisited. Acta Psychologica, 109(1), 41–56.PubMedCrossRef Sanders, A. F., & Lamers, J. M. (2002). The Eriksen-flanker effect revisited. Acta Psychologica, 109(1), 41–56.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shaffer, W. O., & LaBerge, D. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 413–426.CrossRef Shaffer, W. O., & LaBerge, D. (1979). Automatic semantic processing of unattended words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(4), 413–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus–response compatibility (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Stahl, J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2005). Accessory stimulation in the time course of visuomotor information processing: stimulus intensity effects on reaction time and response force. Acta Psychologica, 120, 1–18.PubMedCrossRef Stahl, J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2005). Accessory stimulation in the time course of visuomotor information processing: stimulus intensity effects on reaction time and response force. Acta Psychologica, 120, 1–18.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stoffels, E. J., van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1985). Intersensory facilitation and inhibition: Immediate arousal and location effects of auditory noise on visual choice reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 58, 45–62.PubMedCrossRef Stoffels, E. J., van der Molen, M. W., & Keuss, P. J. G. (1985). Intersensory facilitation and inhibition: Immediate arousal and location effects of auditory noise on visual choice reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 58, 45–62.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behaviorial and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.PubMedCrossRef Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behaviorial and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49, 972–990.CrossRef Ulrich, R., & Mattes, S. (1996). Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 49, 972–990.CrossRef
go back to reference Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. PNAS, 100, 6275–6280.PubMedCrossRef Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. PNAS, 100, 6275–6280.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2007). The costs and benefits of cross-task priming. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 1175–1186.CrossRef Waszak, F., & Hommel, B. (2007). The costs and benefits of cross-task priming. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 1175–1186.CrossRef
go back to reference Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425–432.PubMedCrossRef Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425–432.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S–R associations or inhibition of executive control processes?
Auteurs
Rico Fischer
Franziska Plessow
Andrea Kiesel
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0350-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2012

Psychological Research 3/2012 Naar de uitgave