Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 1/2013

01-03-2013 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Challenging the Construct Validity of Mindfulness Assessment—a Cognitive Interview Study of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory

Auteurs: Florian Belzer, Stefan Schmidt, Gabriele Lucius-Hoene, Johann F. Schneider, Claudia L. Orellana-Rios, Sebastian Sauer

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 1/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI) is a widely used questionnaire of self-reported mindfulness. However, doubts have been expressed as to whether an adequate comprehension of the items of the FMI is independent of one's mindfulness experience (ME). The aim of the present study was to determine with qualitative methods whether and how ME influences the response to the FMI items. Two groups, matched for gender, education, and age (N = 11 each), with and without mindfulness training, completed the FMI while at the same time applying the technique of thinking aloud. The protocols of the two samples were compared using three different strategies: (1) predefined criteria on the comprehension of each item developed by FMI experts, (2) a coding scheme developed to identify differences in specific cognitive processes, and (3) qualitative analysis of comprehension patterns. The results showed that (1) participants with ME fulfilled the item criteria for comprehension much more than participants without ME. (2) The coding scheme demonstrated greater comprehension difficulties in the sample without ME. Differences in judgment processes between groups could not be found. (3) Qualitative analysis revealed comprehension problem patterns especially for eight items for the comparison group. It is concluded that a modification of the wording of several FMI items is necessary and that there is insufficient construct validity to use the current FMI in mindfulness-naïve samples. This may also be true for other scales tapping into the assessment of the awareness component of mindfulness, and it is recommended to also check their construct validity.
Literatuur
go back to reference Baer, R. A. (2007). Mindfulness, assessment, and transdiagnostic processes. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 238–242. CrossRef Baer, R. A. (2007). Mindfulness, assessment, and transdiagnostic processes. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 238–242. CrossRef
go back to reference Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11, 191–206. PubMedCrossRef Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11, 191–206. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. PubMedCrossRef Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bickart, B., & Felcher, E. M. (1996). Expanding and enhancing the use of verbal protocols in survey research. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 115–142). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bickart, B., & Felcher, E. M. (1996). Expanding and enhancing the use of verbal protocols in survey research. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 115–142). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11, 230–241. CrossRef Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11, 230–241. CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefit of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. PubMedCrossRef Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefit of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Brown, G., Hawkes, N. C., & Tata, P. (2009). Construct validity and vulnerability to anxiety: a cognitive interviewing study of the revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 7(23), 942–949. CrossRef Brown, G., Hawkes, N. C., & Tata, P. (2009). Construct validity and vulnerability to anxiety: a cognitive interviewing study of the revised Anxiety Sensitivity Index. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 7(23), 942–949. CrossRef
go back to reference Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223. PubMedCrossRef Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455. PubMedCrossRef Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. CrossRef Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315. CrossRef
go back to reference Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: continuation of a dialogue. In E. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168–189). Reading: Addison-Wesley. Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: continuation of a dialogue. In E. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168–189). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
go back to reference Creswell, D., Way, B. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 560–565. PubMedCrossRef Creswell, D., Way, B. M., Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Neural correlates of dispositional mindfulness during affect labeling. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69, 560–565. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act. New York: McGraw-Hill. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (Revth ed.). Cambridge: Bradford books/MIT Press. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data (Revth ed.). Cambridge: Bradford books/MIT Press.
go back to reference Fattah, S. (2009). Kommunikative Konstruktion von Achtsamkeit in Erzählinterviews: Qualitative Studie mit Teilnehmern eines MBSR-Kurses. Unpublished thesis, Institute of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany. Fattah, S. (2009). Kommunikative Konstruktion von Achtsamkeit in Erzählinterviews: Qualitative Studie mit Teilnehmern eines MBSR-Kurses. Unpublished thesis, Institute of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany.
go back to reference Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190. CrossRef Feldman, G. C., Hayes, A. M., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190. CrossRef
go back to reference Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175–197. CrossRef Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175–197. CrossRef
go back to reference Greve, W., Wentura, D., Gräser, H., & Schmitz, U. (1997). Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung: Eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz. Greve, W., Wentura, D., Gräser, H., & Schmitz, U. (1997). Wissenschaftliche Beobachtung: Eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
go back to reference Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 405–408. PubMedCrossRef Grossman, P. (2008). On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 64(4), 405–408. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Güthlin, C. (2004). Response shift: Alte Probleme der Veränderungsmessung, neu angewendet auf gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 13, 165–174. Güthlin, C. (2004). Response shift: Alte Probleme der Veränderungsmessung, neu angewendet auf gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 13, 165–174.
go back to reference Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B., & Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer mindfulness/mindlessness scale. Assessment, 18, 11–26. PubMedCrossRef Haigh, E. A. P., Moore, M. T., Kashdan, T. B., & Fresco, D. M. (2011). Examination of the factor structure and concurrent validity of the Langer mindfulness/mindlessness scale. Assessment, 18, 11–26. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hak, T., van der Veer, K., & Jansen, H. (2008). The Three-Step Test Interview (TSTI): an observation based method for pretesting self-completion questionnaires. Survey Research Methods, 2(3), 143–150. Hak, T., van der Veer, K., & Jansen, H. (2008). The Three-Step Test Interview (TSTI): an observation based method for pretesting self-completion questionnaires. Survey Research Methods, 2(3), 143–150.
go back to reference Huber, G. L., & Mandl, H. (Eds.). (1982). Verbale Daten: Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen und Methoden der Erhebung und Auswertung. Weinheim: Beltz. Huber, G. L., & Mandl, H. (Eds.). (1982). Verbale Daten: Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen und Methoden der Erhebung und Auswertung. Weinheim: Beltz.
go back to reference Kuckartz, U. (2006). Quick and dirty? Qualitative Methoden in der drittmittelfinanzierten Evaluation in der Umweltforschung. In U. Flick (Ed.), Qualitative Evaluationsforschung. Konzepte, Methoden, Umsetzungen (pp. 267–283). Reinbeck: Rowohlt. Kuckartz, U. (2006). Quick and dirty? Qualitative Methoden in der drittmittelfinanzierten Evaluation in der Umweltforschung. In U. Flick (Ed.), Qualitative Evaluationsforschung. Konzepte, Methoden, Umsetzungen (pp. 267–283). Reinbeck: Rowohlt.
go back to reference Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467. PubMedCrossRef Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341. PubMedCrossRef Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Marcel, A. J. (2003). Introspective report: trust, self-knowledge and science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(167), 186. Marcel, A. J. (2003). Introspective report: trust, self-knowledge and science. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(167), 186.
go back to reference Mayring, P. (1983). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz: Weinheim. Mayring, P. (1983). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz: Weinheim.
go back to reference Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Weinheim: Beltz Studium. Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Weinheim: Beltz Studium.
go back to reference Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., et al. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130. CrossRef Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., et al. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130. CrossRef
go back to reference Prüfer, P., & Rexroth, M. (2005). Kognitive Interviews. Mannheim: ZUMA How-to-Reihe Nr. 15. Prüfer, P., & Rexroth, M. (2005). Kognitive Interviews. Mannheim: ZUMA How-to-Reihe Nr. 15.
go back to reference Reavley, N., & Pallant, J. F. (2009). Development of a scale to assess the meditation experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 547–552. CrossRef Reavley, N., & Pallant, J. F. (2009). Development of a scale to assess the meditation experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 547–552. CrossRef
go back to reference Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Horan, M., & Kohls, N. (2011). Implicit and explicit emotional behavior and mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1558–1569. PubMedCrossRef Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Horan, M., & Kohls, N. (2011). Implicit and explicit emotional behavior and mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1558–1569. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, J. F., & Reichl, C. (2006). Exploring ease in thinking aloud. Psychological Reports, 98(1), 85–90. PubMedCrossRef Schneider, J. F., & Reichl, C. (2006). Exploring ease in thinking aloud. Psychological Reports, 98(1), 85–90. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, wording, and context. quantitative studies in social relations. New York: Academic. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: experiments on question form, wording, and context. quantitative studies in social relations. New York: Academic.
go back to reference Solloway, S. G., & Fisher, W. P. (2007). Mindfulness practice: a Rasch variable construct innovation. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(4), 359–372. PubMed Solloway, S. G., & Fisher, W. P. (2007). Mindfulness practice: a Rasch variable construct innovation. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(4), 359–372. PubMed
go back to reference Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions: a practical guide to questionnaire design (1 ed). The Jossey-Bass series in social and behavioral science series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions: a practical guide to questionnaire design (1 ed). The Jossey-Bass series in social and behavioral science series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73–100). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73–100). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
go back to reference Turner, C. B., & Fiske, D. W. (1968). Item quality and appropriateness of response processes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28(2), 297–315. CrossRef Turner, C. B., & Fiske, D. W. (1968). Item quality and appropriateness of response processes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28(2), 297–315. CrossRef
go back to reference Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1543–1555. CrossRef Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1543–1555. CrossRef
go back to reference Way, B. M., Creswell, J. D., Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Dispositional mindfulness and depressive symptomatology: correlations with limbic and self-referential neural activity during rest. Emotion, 10, 12–24. PubMedCrossRef Way, B. M., Creswell, J. D., Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Dispositional mindfulness and depressive symptomatology: correlations with limbic and self-referential neural activity during rest. Emotion, 10, 12–24. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
go back to reference Wirtz, M., & Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität: Methoden zur Bestimmung und Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeit von Einschätzungen mittels Kategoriensystemen und Ratingskalen. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Wirtz, M., & Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität: Methoden zur Bestimmung und Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeit von Einschätzungen mittels Kategoriensystemen und Ratingskalen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Metagegevens
Titel
Challenging the Construct Validity of Mindfulness Assessment—a Cognitive Interview Study of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
Auteurs
Florian Belzer
Stefan Schmidt
Gabriele Lucius-Hoene
Johann F. Schneider
Claudia L. Orellana-Rios
Sebastian Sauer
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0165-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2013

Mindfulness 1/2013 Naar de uitgave

ORTHOGONAL ROTATION IN CONSCIOUSNESS

Being Seen