Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness 1/2013

01-03-2013 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Specific Objectivity of Mindfulness—A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory

Auteurs: Sebastian Sauer, Matthias Ziegler, Erik Danay, John Ives, Niko Kohls

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 1/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Even as modern research on mindfulness has expanded, debate continues with regard to the measurement and conceptualization of mindfulness. This divergence has manifested in a proliferation of different measurement approaches. The present research contributes to the advancement of mindfulness measurement by performing a Rasch model analysis of the psychometric properties of the short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14). This rigorous psychometric method belongs to the family item response theory and can be considered to be a set of approaches complementing classical test theory. The FMI-14 was administered to a nonclinical convenience sample of N = 1,452 German adults. Our data showed poor fit to the Rasch model. A reanalysis of the model excluding one particular misfitting item (number 13) yielded an acceptable fit for the originally proposed one-factorial solution to the Rasch model. However, a two-factorial solution with the subfacets “presence” and “acceptance” provided a better overall fit than the unidimensional solution. Some degree of differential item functioning could be observed both in the uni- and two-dimensional solution suggesting that potential exists for improving the measurement quality of the FMI-13. In line with the recent research, it is concluded that the FMI-13 should be considered as a two-dimensional rather than a unidimensional instrument.

Literatuur
  1. Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573.View Article
  2. Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Egan, V. (2006). Individual differences in response scale use: mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1235–1245.View Article
  3. Baer, R. A. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.PubMedView Article
  4. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.PubMedView Article
  5. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241.View Article
  6. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah: LEA.
  7. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.PubMedView Article
  8. Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: the development of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Journal for Meditation and Meditation Research, 1(1), 11–34.
  9. Cardaciotto, L. A., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204.PubMedView Article
  10. Eid, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2007). Detecting response styles and faking in personality and organizational assessments by mixed Rasch models. Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. doi:10.​1007/​978-0-387-49839-3_​16.
  11. Eisendrath, S. J., Delucchi, K., Bitner, R., Fenimore, P., Smit, M., & McLane, M. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 77(5), 319–320.PubMedView Article
  12. Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah: LEA.
  13. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995). Rasch models: foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer.
  14. Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.PubMedView Article
  15. Gray, J. A. (1994). Three fundamental emotion systems. In D. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: fundamental questions (pp. 243–247). New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040.PubMedView Article
  17. Grossman, P., & Van Dam, N. T. (2011). Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(01), 219–239.View Article
  18. Höfling, V., Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., & Heidenreich, T. (2011). Mindfulness or mindlessness? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 59–64.View Article
  19. Kohls, N., Sauer, S., & Walach, H. (2009). Facets of mindfulness—results of an online study investigating the Freiburg mindfulness inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 224–230.View Article
  20. Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341.PubMedView Article
  21. Linacre, J. M. (2010). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS, MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.
  22. Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: a substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 810–819.PubMedView Article
  23. Masters, G. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174.View Article
  24. Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in psychology: critical history of a methodological concept. New York: Cambridge University Press.View Article
  25. Offenbächer, M., Sauer, S., Hieblinger, R., Hufford, D. J., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011). Spirituality and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: content comparison of questionnaires measuring mindfulness based on the International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25–26), 2434–2445.PubMed
  26. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42.PubMedView Article
  27. Raîche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes in standardized residual principal components analysis. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 19(1), 1012.
  28. Rost, J. (1991). A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44(1), 75–92.View Article
  29. Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & Von Davier, M. (1997). Applying the mixed Rasch model to personality questionnaires. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences. New York: Waxmann.
  30. Sauer, S., Lynch, S., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011a). Dialectics of mindfulness: implications for Western medicine. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 6(1), 10.PubMedView Article
  31. Sauer, S., Walach, H., & Kohls, N. (2011b). Gray’s behavioural inhibition system as a mediator of mindfulness towards well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(4), 506–551.View Article
  32. Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Horan, M., & Kohls, N. (2011c). Implicit and explicit emotional behavior and mindfulness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1558–1569.PubMedView Article
  33. Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., et al. (2012). Assessment of mindfulness: review on state of the art. Mindfulness. doi:10.​1007/​s12671-012-0122-5.
  34. Shapiro, S. L., Bootzin, R. R., Figueredo, A. J., Lopez, A. M., & Schwartz, G. E. (2003). The efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in the treatment of sleep disturbance in women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 54(1), 85–91.PubMedView Article
  35. Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386.PubMedView Article
  36. Smith, R. M., & Miao, C. Y. (1994). Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In M. Wilson (Ed.), Objective measurement: theory into practice (vol. 2). Greenwich: Ablex.
  37. Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmüller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1543–1555.View Article
  38. Zickar, M. J., Gibby, R. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Uncovering faking samples in applicant, incumbent, and experimental data sets: an application of mixed-model item response theory. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 168–190.View Article
Metagegevens
Titel
Specific Objectivity of Mindfulness—A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
Auteurs
Sebastian Sauer
Matthias Ziegler
Erik Danay
John Ives
Niko Kohls
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2013
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Mindfulness / Uitgave 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0145-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2013

Mindfulness 1/2013 Naar de uitgave