Skip to main content
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
ZOEKEN
MENU 1 2 3 4
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander hoofdstuk

Gepubliceerd in:
De beroepsvorming van de ergotherapie hoofdstuk lezen eerste hoofdstuk lezen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

17. Begrippen begrijpen: de onderbouwing van ergotherapiemodellen

Auteurs: MSc Astrid Kinébanian, Ergotherapeut Inka Logister-Proost

Gepubliceerd in: Grondslagen van de ergotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Samenvatting

Dit hoofdstuk bevat een omschrijving van de termen visie, missie en paradigma, kennis en theorie, referentiekaders, methodiek, methodisch handelen en methode, inhouds- en procesmodellen. Hierbij wordt ingegaan op de theoretische perspectieven van waaruit ergotherapeutische inhouds- en procesmodellen ontwikkeld zijn. De kenmerken van procesmodellen worden besproken en er wordt een beknopt overzicht gegeven van ergotherapeutische inhouds- en procesmodellen.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL - Grondslagen van de ergotherapie

Meer informatie

BSL Basisacademy hbo-V

Meer informatie
vorige hoofdstuk Handelingsgebieden: spelen en vrije tijd
volgende hoofdstuk Het Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) en het Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF)
Literatuur
Allen, C. K., Earhart, C. A., & Blue, T. (1992). Occupational therapy treatment goals for the physically and cognitively disabled. Rockville (MD): American Occupational Therapy Association.
AOTA. (2007). AOTA’s Centennial Vision and executive summary. American Occupational Therapy, 61(6), 613–614. CrossRef
AOTA. (2015). Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain & process 3rd edition. American Occupational Therapy, 68(Supplement 1), S1-S48.
Balm, M. F. K. (2007). Gezond bewegen kun je leren: Gedragsverandering door ergo-, fysio- en oefentherapeuten. Utrecht: Lemma.
Bass, J. D., Baum, C., & Christiansen, C. A. (2015). Interventions and outcomes The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) Occupational Therapy Process. In C. Christiansen, C. Baum, & J. Bass (Eds.), Occupational Therapy: Performance, Participation and Well-being. Slack: Thorofare, NJ.
Baum, C., Christiansen, C. A., & Bass, J. D. (2015). The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) Model. In C. Christiansen, C. Baum, & J. Bass (Eds.), Occup Ther: Performance, Participation and Well-being. Slack: Thorofare, NJ.
Blesedell-Crepeau, E., Cohn, E. S., & Boyt-Schell, B. A. (2003). Willard & Spackman’s occup ther (10th ed.). Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bruce, M. A., & Borg, B. (2002). Psychosocial frames of reference: Core for occupation-based practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
Chapparo, C., & Ranka, J. (1997). The Occup Per Mod (Australia). Monograph 1. Lidcombe: OP Network, University of Sydney.
Chapparo, C., & Ranka, J. (2005). Theoretical contexts. In G. Whiteford & V. Wright-St Clair (Eds.), Occupation & practice in context.. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone.
Christiansen, C. H., & Townsend, E. A. (Eds.). (2010). Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Christiansen, C. H., Baum, C. M., & Bass, J. D. (2015). Occupational therapy performance, participation and well-Being. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
Cole, M. B., & Tufano, R. (2008). Applied theories in occupational therapy: A practical approach. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
Craik, J., Davis, J., & Polatajko, H. J. (2013). Introducing the Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF), amplifying the context. In E. A. Townsend & H. J. Polatajko (Eds.), Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation (2nd ed., pag. 229–246). Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE.
Dewey, J. (1996). The supremacy of method. In M. H. Fischer (Ed.), Classic American philosophers. New York: Fordham University Press.
Driessen, M., & Heijsman, A. (2006). Adviseren aan derden. In A. Kinébanian & M. Granse, le (Red.), Grondslagen van de ergotherapie. Maarssen: Elsevier ge-zondheidszorg.
Duncan, E. A. S. (2006). Foundations for practice in occupational therapy (4th ed.). London: Churchill Livingstone.
Ebskamp, J. (2006). Basisboek beroepsethiek voor Social Work. Baarn: Nelissen.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Fisher, A. G. (2009). Occupational therapy intervention process model: A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins (CO): Three Star Press.
Gerards, F., & Borger, R. (2006). Health counseling. Baarn: Nelissen.
Hartingsveldt, M. J. van, Logister-Proost, I., & Kinébanian, A. (2010). Beroepsprofiel ergotherapeut. Utrecht: Ergo-therapie Nederland/Boom Lemma.
Heijsman, A., Kuiper, C., & Lemette, M. (Red.). (1999). De ergotherapeut als adviseur: Methodiek en adviesvaardigheden. Utrecht: Lemma.
Heijsman, A., Lemette, M., Veld, A. de, & Kuiper, C. (Red.). (2007). Adviseren als ergotherapeut: Competenties en verhalen uit de praktijk. Den Haag: Boom Lemma.
Higgs, J., Jones, M., Loftus, S., & Christensen, N. (2008). Clinical reasoning in the health professions (3rd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Holm, M. B. (1986). Frames of reference: guides for action-occupational therapist. In H. Schmid (Ed.), Project for independent living in occupational therapy (PILOT) (pag. 69–78). Rockville (MD): AOTA.
Hooper, B. (2006). Beyond active learning: A case study of teaching practices in an occupation centered curriculum. American Occupational Therapy, 60, 551–562. CrossRef
Ikiugu, M. N. (2004). Instrumentalism in occupational therapy: An argument for a pragmatic conceptual model of practice. International Journal of Psychsocial Rehabilitation, 8, 109–117.
Ikiugu, M. N., Smallfield, S., & Condit, C. (2009). A framework for combining theoretical conceptual practice models in occupational therapy practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(3), 162–170. CrossRef
Ikiugu, M. N., & Smallfield, S. (2011). Ikiugu’s eclectic method of combining theoretical conceptual practice models in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy, 58(6), 437–46. CrossRef
Iwama, M. K. (2006). The kawa model: Culturally relevant occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Kielhofner, G., & Forsyth, K. (2008). Therapeutic reasoning: Planning, implementing and evaluating the outcomes of therapy. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Model of Human Occup: Theory and practice. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
Kielhofner, G. (2004). Conceptual foundations of occup ther (3rd ed.). Philadelphia (PA): FA Davis.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experimental learning, experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Korthagen, F., & Lagerwerf, B. (2008). Leren van binnenuit: Onderwijsontwikkeling in een nieuwe tijd. Baarn: Nelissen.
Kronenberg, F., Pollard, N., & Sakellariou, D. (Eds.) (2011). Occupational therapies without borders, Vol 2: Towards an ecology of occup-based practices. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Steward, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(1), 9–23. CrossRef
Melton, J., Forsyth, K., & Freeth, D. (2009). Using theory in Practice. In E. Duncan (Ed.), Skills for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Mosey, A. C. (1986). Psychosocial components of occup ther. New York: Raven Press.
Mosey, A. C. (1992). Applied scientific inquiry in the health professions: An epistemological orientation. Rockville (MD): American Occupational Therapy Association.
Nieuwesteeg-Gutzwiller, M., & Somazzi, M. (2010). Hand-lungsorientierte Ergotherapie: Das Bieler Model als Grundlage für Ausbildung und Praxis. Bern: Huber.
O’Neal, S., Dickerson, A. E., & Holbert, D. (2007). The use of theory by occupational therapists working with adults with developmental disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 21(4), 71–85. CrossRefPubMed
Ploeg, J. D. van der. (2011). Ervaringsleren, theorie en praktijk. Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.
Poell, R., & Kessels, J. (2001). Human resource development: Organiseren van het leren (pag. 24). Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
Polatajko, H. J., Davis, J., Stewart, D., Cantin, N., Amoroso, B., & Purdie, L. (2013). Specifying the domain of concern: Occupation as core. In E. A. Townsend & H. J. Polatajko (Eds.). Enabling Occupation II: Advancing an Occupational Therapy Vision for Health, Well-being & Justice through Occupation (2nd ed., pag. 13–36). Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE.
Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (2002). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer & F. M. Lewis (Eds.). Health behaviour and health education: theory, research and practice (3rd. ed., pag. 99–120). San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
Rogers, J. (2010). Occupational reasoning. In M. Curtin, M. Molineux, & J. Supyk-Mellson (Eds.), Occup ther and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation (6th ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Satink, T., & Loon, H. van. (2006). Methodisch handelen. In A. Kinébanian & M. Granse, le (Red.), Grondslagen van de ergotherapie. Maarssen: Elsevier ge-zondheidszorg.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schultz, S. (2009). Theory of occupational adaptation. In E. Blesedell-Crepeau, E. S. Cohn & B. A. Boyt-Schell (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pag. 478–518). Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Steultjens, E. M. J., Cup, E. H. C., Zajec, J., & Hees, S. van, (2013). Ergotherapierichtlijn CVA. Nijmegen/Utrecht: Hoge-school van Arnhem en Nijmegen/Ergotherapie Nederland.
Supyk-Mellson, J., & McKenna, J. (2010). Understanding models of practice. In M. Curtin, M. Molineux, & J. Supyk-Mellson (Eds.), Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction: Enabling occupation (6th ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Turpin, M., & Iwama, M. K. (2011). Using occupational therapy models in practice. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier: A field guide. Edinburgh.
Whiteford, G., & Wright-St Clair, V. (2005). Occup & prac in context. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone.
Wilcock, A. A., & Townsend, E. A. (2009). Occupational justice. In E. Blesedell-Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. Boyt-Schell (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed.). Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Wilcock, A. A. (2006). An occup perspective on health (2nd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
Wong, S. R., & Fisher, G. (2015). Comparing and Using Occupation-Focused Models. Occup Ther Health Care., 29(3), 297–315. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Begrippen begrijpen: de onderbouwing van ergotherapiemodellen
Auteurs
MSc Astrid Kinébanian
Ergotherapeut Inka Logister-Proost
Copyright
2017
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek
Grondslagen van de ergotherapie

Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1703-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1704-2

Copyright: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1704-2_17

Version: 0.1959.0