Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 4/2024

31-01-2024

Assessing the interchangeability of linked scores in multivariable statistical analyses

Auteurs: Maxwell Mansolf, Courtney K. Blackwell, David Cella, Jin-Shei Lai

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 4/2024

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

Using the lens of classical test theory, we examine a linkage’s generalizability with respect to use in multivariable analyses, including multiple regression and structural equation modeling, rather than comparison of established subpopulations as is most common in the literature.

Methods

To aid in this evaluation, we present a structural-equation-modeling based statistical method to examine the suitability of a given linkage for use cases involving continuous and categorical variables external to the linkage itself.

Results

Using the PROMIS® Parent Proxy and Early Childhood Global Health measures, we show that, although a high correlation between the scores (here, r = .829) may imply a general suitability for linking, a more detailed investigation of content, measurement structure, and results of the proposed methodology reveal important differences between the measures which can compromise interchangeability in certain use cases.

Conclusion

In addition to the statistical quality of a linkage, users of linking methodology should also assess the question of whether the linkage is appropriate to apply to particular use cases of interest.
vorige artikel Mapping of Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) scores to EQ-5D: algorithm to calculate utility values
volgende artikel Factors associated with improved health-related quality of life due to improvements in physical function and dialysis-related symptoms following intradialytic exercise in outpatients undergoing haemodialysis
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
The actual item parameters used for PROMIS scoring are proprietary and could not be included. To obtain these parameters, contact HealthMeasures.net. Perturbation was conducted to mask the actual values by adding noise generated, separately for each item, from a random uniform distribution with limits of − .25 and .25.
 
Literatuur
1.
Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M., & Holland, P. W. (2007). Linking and aligning scores and scales. Springer.CrossRef
2.
Feuer, M. J. (2005). E pluribus Unum: Linking tests and democratic education. Measurement and research in the accountability era (pp. 173–192). Routledge.
3.
Huggins, A. C., & Penfield, R. D. (2012). An NCME instructional module on population invariance in linking and equating. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(1), 27–40.CrossRef
4.
5.
Choi, S. W., Schalet, B., Cook, K. F., & Cella, D. (2014). Establishing a common metric for depressive symptoms: Linking the BDI, CESD, and PHQ9 to PROMIS depression. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 513.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Kaat, A. J., Newcomb, M. E., Ryan, D. T., & Mustanski, B. (2017). Expanding a common metric for depression reporting: Linking two scales to PROMIS® depression. Quality of Life Research, 26(5), 1119–1128.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Blackwell, C. K., Tang, X., Elliott, A. J., Thomes, T., Louwagie, H., Gershon, R., & Cella, D. (2021). Developing a common metric for depression across adulthood: Linking PROMIS depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(7), 610.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Holland, P. W. (2007). A framework and history for score linking. Linking and aligning scores and scales (pp. 5–30). Springer.CrossRef
9.
Bentler, P. M. (2017). Specificity-enhanced reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 527.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Kallen, M. A., Lai, J. S., Blackwell, C. K., Schuchard, J. R., Forrest, C. B., Wakschlag, L. S., & Cella, D. (2022). Measuring PROMIS® global health in early childhood. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 47(5), 523–533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Forrest, C. B., Bevans, K. B., Pratiwadi, R., Moon, J., Teneralli, R. E., Minton, J. M., & Tucker, C. A. (2014). Development of the PROMIS® pediatric global health (PGH-7) measure. Quality of Life Research, 23, 1221–1231.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Cella, D., Blackwell, C. K., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2022). Bringing PROMIS to early childhood: Introduction and qualitative methods for the development of early childhood parent report instruments. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 47(5), 500–509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Lai, J.-S., Kallen, M. A., Blackwell, C. K., Wakschlag, L. S., & Cella, D. (2022). Psychometric considerations in developing PROMIS® measures for early childhood. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 47(5), 510–522.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
16.
Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability. University of California Press.
17.
18.
19.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.CrossRef
20.
Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (2000). Population invariance and the equitability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 281–306.CrossRef
21.
Dorans, N. J., & Feigenbaum, M. D. (1994). Equating issues engendered by changes to the new SAT and PSAT/NMSQT. In I. M. Lawrence, N. J. Dorans, M. D. Feigenbaum, N. J. Feryok, A. P. Schmitt, & N. K. Wright (Eds.), Technical issues related to the introduction of the new SAT and PSAT/NMSQT (ETS Research Memorandum No. RM-94-10). Educational Testing Service.
22.
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
Metagegevens
Titel
Assessing the interchangeability of linked scores in multivariable statistical analyses
Auteurs
Maxwell Mansolf
Courtney K. Blackwell
David Cella
Jin-Shei Lai
Publicatiedatum
31-01-2024
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03592-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2024

Quality of Life Research 4/2024 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Dynamic changes and lifetime effect of functional disability profiles for stroke patients: real-world evidence from South Korea

OriginalPaper

Associations between the EQ-5D-5L and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the ETHOS trial

OriginalPaper

Assessing health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes accessing healthcare in two public hospitals in south-eastern Ghana: a cross-sectional descriptive study

OriginalPaper

Development of standard computerised adaptive test (CAT) settings for the EORTC CAT Core

OriginalPaper

Estimating anchor-based minimal important change using longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis

OriginalPaper

Administering selected subscales of patient-reported outcome questionnaires to reduce patient burden and increase relevance: a position statement on a modular approach