Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life

Auteurs: Eve B. Carlson, Nigel P. Field, Josef I. Ruzek, Richard A. Bryant, Constance J. Dalenberg, Terrence M. Keane, David A. Spain

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objectives

Ambulatory assessment data collection methods are increasingly used to study behavior, experiences, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as emotions, cognitions, and symptoms in clinical samples. Data collected close in time at frequent and fixed intervals can assess PROs that are discrete or changing rapidly and provide information about temporal dynamics or mechanisms of change in clinical samples and individuals, but clinical researchers have not yet routinely and systematically investigated the reliability and validity of such measures or their potential added value over conventional measures. The present study provides a comprehensive, systematic evaluation of the psychometrics of several proximal intensive assessment (PIA) measures in a clinical sample and investigates whether PIA appears to assess meaningful differences in phenomena over time.

Methods

Data were collected on a variety of psychopathology constructs on handheld devices every 4 h for 7 days from 62 adults recently exposed to traumatic injury of themselves or a family member. Data were also collected on standard self-report measures of the same constructs at the time of enrollment, 1 week after enrollment, and 2 months after injury.

Results

For all measure scores, results showed good internal consistency across items and within persons over time, provided evidence of convergent, divergent, and construct validity, and showed significant between- and within-subject variability.

Conclusions

Results indicate that PIA measures can provide valid measurement of psychopathology in a clinical sample. PIA may be useful to study mechanisms of change in clinical contexts, identify targets for change, and gauge treatment progress.
vorige artikel Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes
volgende artikel Use of weekly assessment data to enhance evaluation of a subjective wellbeing intervention
Literatuur
1.
Schwarz, N. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). New York: Guilford Press.
2.
Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for social and personality psychology (pp. 190–222). New York: Wiley.
3.
Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Diary methods for personality and social psychology. Los Angeles: Sage.
4.
Myin-Germeys, I., Oorschot, M., Collip, D., Lataster, J., Delespaul, P., & van Os, J. (2009). Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life. Psychological Medicine, 39(9), 1533–1547.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Shrout, P. E., & Lane, S. P. (2012). Psychometrics. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 302–320). New York: Guilford.
6.
Kashdan, T. B., & Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Whether, when, and how is spirituality related to well-being? Moving beyond single occasion questionnaires to understanding daily process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1523–1535.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Nezlek, J. B., Sorrentino, R. M., Yasunaga, S., Otsubo, Y., Allen, M., Kouhara, S., & Shuper, P. (2008). Cross-cultural differences in reactions to daily events as indicators of cross-cultural differences in self-construction and affect. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 685–702.CrossRef
8.
Nezlek, J. B., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Depression as a moderator of relationships between positive daily events and day-to-day psychological adjustment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1692–1704.CrossRef
9.
Wilhelm, P., & Schoebi, D. (2007). Assessing mood in daily life: Structural validity, sensitivity to change, and reliability of a short-scale to measure three basic dimensions of mood. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 258–267.CrossRef
10.
Kimhy, D., Delespaul, P., Corcoran, C., Ahn, H., Yale, S., & Malaspina, D. (2006). Computerized experience sampling method (ESMc): Assessing feasibility and validity among individuals with schizophrenia. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40, 221–230.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Granholm, E., Loh, C., & Swendsen, J. (2008). Feasibility and validity of computerized ecological momentary assessment in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 507–514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Kimhy, D., Delespaul, P., Ahn, H., Cai, S., Shikhman, M., Lieberman, J. A., et al. (2010). Concurrent measurement of “real-world” stress and arousal in individuals with psychosis: Assessing the feasibility and validity of a novel methodology. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 1131–1139.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Wheeler, L., & Reis, H. T. (1991). Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality, 59, 339–354.CrossRef
14.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 526–536.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment in behavioral medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 199–202.
16.
Ariely, D., & Carmon, Z. (2000). Gestalt characteristics of experiences: The defining features of summarized events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 191–201.CrossRef
17.
Redelmeier, D. A., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 66, 3–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Redelmeier, D. A., Katz, J., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Memories of colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Pain, 104, 187–194.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Kamarck, T. W., Shiffman, S., Muldoon, M. F., Sutton-Tyrrell, K., Gwaltney, C. J., Janicki, D. L., & Schwartz, J. E. (2007). Ecological momentary assessment as a resource for social epidemiology. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 268–285). New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Carlson, E. B. (2001). Psychometric study of a brief screen for PTSD: Assessing the impact of multiple traumatic events. Assessment, 8, 431–441.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Caspi, Y., Carlson, E. B., & Klein, E. (2007). Validation of a screening instrument for posttraumatic stress disorder in a community sample of Bedouin men serving in the Israeli Defense Forces. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 529–539.CrossRef
22.
Carlson, E. B., Waelde, L., Palmieri, P. A., Smith, S. R., McDade-Montez, E., & Macia, K. (in press). Development and validation of the Dissociative Symptoms Scale. Assessment.
23.
Ehlers, A., & Clark, D. M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 319–345.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Stanton, A. L., Kirk, S. B., Cameron, C. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2000). Coping through emotional approach: Scale construction and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1150–1169.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Foa, E. B., Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Tolin, D. F., & Orsillo, S. M. (1999). The posttraumatic cognitions inventory (PTCI): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 303–314.CrossRef
26.
Bolton, E. E., Glenn, D. M., Orsillo, S., Roemer, L., & Litz, B. T. (2003). The relationship between self-disclosure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in peacekeepers deployed to Somalia. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 203–210.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Cordova, M. J., Ruzek, J. I., Benoit, M., & Brunet, A. (2003). Promotion of emotional disclosure following illness and injury: A brief intervention for medical patients and their families. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 10, 358–371.CrossRef
28.
Emmons, R. A., McCullough, M. E., & Tsang, J.-A. (2003). The assessment of gratitude. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 327–341). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
29.
Feldman Barrett, E., & Barrett, D. J. (1999). Experience sampling program. Boston: Boston College.
30.
Jacobs, N., Nicolson, N., Derom, C., Delespaul, P., van Os, J., & Myin-Germeys, I. (2005). Electronic monitoring of salivary cortisol sampling compliance in daily life. Life Sciences, 76, 2431–2443.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Wichers, M. C., Myin-Germeys, I., Jacobs, N., Peeters, F., Kenis, G., Derom, C., et al. (2007). Evidence that moment-to-moment variation in positive emotions buffer genetic risk for depression: A momentary assessment twin study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 115, 451–457.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Delespaul, P., deVries, M., & Van Os, J. (2002). Determinants of occurrence and recovery from hallucinations in daily life. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 37, 97–104.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Myin-Germeys, I., van Os, J., Schwartz, J. E., Stone, A. A., & Delespaul, P. A. (2001). Emotional reactivity to daily life stress in psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58(12), 1137–1144.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Geschwind, N., Peeters, F., Jacobs, N., Delespaul, P., Derom, C., Thiery, E., et al. (2010). Meeting risk with resilience: High daily life reward experience preserves mental health. Acta Psychiatra Scandinavica, 122, 129–138.CrossRef
35.
Nezlek, J. B. (2011). Mutilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Los Angeles: Sage.
36.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
37.
Dalenberg, C. J., & Carlson, E. B. (2012). Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder part II: How theoretical models fit the empirical evidence and recommendations for modifying the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. Psychological Trauma, 4, 551–559.CrossRef
38.
Breslau, N., Kessler, R. C., Chilcoat, H. D., Schultz, L. R., Davis, G. C., & Andreski, P. (1998). Trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in the community: The 1996 Detroit Area Survey of Trauma. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 626–631.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Carlson, E. B., Dalenberg, C. J., & McDade-Montez, E. (2012). Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder part I: Definitions and review of research. Psychological Trauma, 4, 479–489.CrossRef
40.
Kaniasty, K. (2005). Social support and traumatic stress. PTSD Research Quarterly, 16(2), 1–7.
41.
Cordova, M. J., Cunningham, L. L. C., Carlson, C. R., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2001). Social constraints, cognitive processing, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 706–711.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Christianson, S. (Ed.). (1992). Handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43.
Myin-Germeys, I. (2012). Psychiatry. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 636–650). New York: Guilford Press.
44.
Stone, A. A. (2007). Thoughts on the present state of real-time data capture. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 361–370). New York: Oxford University Press.
Metagegevens
Titel
Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life
Auteurs
Eve B. Carlson
Nigel P. Field
Josef I. Ruzek
Richard A. Bryant
Constance J. Dalenberg
Terrence M. Keane
David A. Spain
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2016

Quality of Life Research 3/2016 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Health-related needs of people with multiple chronic diseases: differences and underlying factors

Editorial

Introduction to special section on patient-reported outcomes in nonstandard settings

Brief Communication

Well-being and environmental quality: Does pollution affect life satisfaction?

OriginalPaper

Dimensionality of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: an exploratory bi-factor analytic study

OriginalPaper

Stability of the 13-item sense of coherence (SOC) scale: a longitudinal prospective study in women treated for breast cancer

OriginalPaper

Smoking status and health-related quality of life: a longitudinal study in young adults