Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Use of weekly assessment data to enhance evaluation of a subjective wellbeing intervention

Auteurs: Lucia Colla, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Adrian J. Tomyn, Ben Richardson, Justin D. Tomyn

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

While intervention effects in target outcomes have typically been tested based on change from baseline to post-intervention, such approaches typically ignore individual differences in change, including time taken to see improvement. The present study demonstrates how weekly patient-reported data may be used to augment traditional pre–post intervention evaluations in order to gain greater insights into treatment efficacy.

Methods

Two hundred and fifty-two adolescent boys and girls (M age = 13.6 years, SD = 0.6 years) from four secondary schools in Victoria, Australia, were assigned by school into control (n = 88) or intervention (n = 164) groups. The intervention group participated in a 6-week course designed to improve subjective wellbeing (SWB) by fostering resilience, coping skills, and self-esteem. In addition to baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up assessments of SWB, intervention group participants also completed weekly summarise of affective experiences for the duration of the intervention phase.

Results

While standard pre–post data showed significant improvement in SWB for the intervention group relative to controls, weekly data showed individual differences in the trajectory of change during this intervention phase; low SWB individuals experienced initial worsening of symptoms followed by improvement in the second half of the intervention phase, whereas high SWB individuals experienced initial gains, followed by a plateau from Week 4 onwards.

Conclusions

Addition of weekly data provided greater insights into intervention effects by: (1) contradicting the notion that early responsiveness to treatment is predictive of level of improvement by post-intervention, and (2) providing data-based insights into ways to enhance the intervention.
vorige artikel Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life
volgende artikel AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases
Literatuur
1.
Merry, S., McDowell, H., Hetrick, S., Bir, J., & Muller, N. (2004). Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2.
2.
Spence, S. H., & Shortt, A. L. (2007). Research review: Can we justify the widespread dissemination of universal school-based interventions for the prevention of depression among children and adolescents? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(6), 526–542.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Sterba, S. K., & Bauer, D. J. (2010). Matching method with theory in person-oriented developmental psychopathology research. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 239–254.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Timmons, A. C., & Preacher, K. J. (2015). The importance of temporal design: How do measurement intervals affect the accuracy and efficiency of parameter estimates in longitudinal research? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 41–55.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Katon, W., Russo, J., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Simon, G., Bush, T., et al. (2002). Long-term effects of a collaborative care intervention in persistently depressed primary care patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17, 741–748.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
Wilksch, S., & Wade, T. D. (2009). Reduction of shape and weight concern in young adolescents: A 30-month controlled evaluation of a media literacy program. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(6), 652–661.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Withers, G. F., & Wertheim, E. H. (2004). Applying the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion to a videotape-based eating disorders primary prevention program for adolescent girls. Eating Disorders, 12, 103–124.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Barge-Schaapveld, D. Q. C. M., & Nicolson, N. A. (2002). Effects of antidepressant treatment on the quality of daily life: An experience sampling study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(6), 477–485.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Voogt, C., Kuntsche, E., Kleinjan, M., Poelen, E., & Engels, R. (2014). Using ecological momentary assessment to test the effectiveness of a web-based brief alcohol intervention over time among heavy-drinking students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(1), e5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
Shiyko, M. P., & Ram, N. (2011). Conceptualizing and estimating process speed in studies employing ecological momentary assessment designs: A multilevel variance decomposition approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(6), 875–899.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Skouteris, H., Richardson, B., Blore, J., Holmes, M., & Mills, J. (2013). Does the burden of the experience sampling method undermine data quality in state based body image research? Body Image, 10(4), 607–613.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Morren, M., van Dulmen, S., Ouwerkerk, J., & Bensing, J. (2009). Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: A systematic review. European Journal of Pain, 13, 354–365.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Scholten, L., Willemen, A. M., Last, B. F., Maurice-Stam, H., van Dijk, E. M., Ensink, E., et al. (2013). Efficacy of psychosocial group intervention for children with chronic illness and their parents. Pediatrics, 131(4), e1196–e1203.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Spence, S. H., Sheffield, J. K., & Donovan, C. L. (2005). Long-term outcome of a school-based, universal approach to prevention of depression in adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(1), 160–167.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Brown, E. C., Catalano, R. F., Fleming, C. B., & Haggerty, K. P. (2005). Adolescent substance use outcomes in the Raising Healthy Children Project: A two-part latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 699–710.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Malmberg, M., Kleinjan, M., Overbeek, G., Vermulst, A., Lammers, J., Monshouwer, K., et al. (2015). Substance use outcomes in the Healthy School and Drugs program: Results from a latent growth curve approach. Addictive Behaviors, 42, 194–202.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A. W., & Esperanza, J. (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behaviour support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(3), 133–144.CrossRef
18.
Titov, N., Andrews, G., Davies, M., McIntyre, K., Robinson, E., & Solley, K. (2010). Internet treatment for depression: A randomized controlled trial comparing clinician vs. technician assistance. PLoS One, 5(6), e10939.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 897–914.CrossRef
21.
22.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.CrossRef
23.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Colautti, L. A., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Skouteris, H., McCabe, M., Blackburn, S., & Wyett, E. (2011). Accounting for fluctuations in body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 8(4), 315–321.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Karatzias, A., Chouliara, Z., Power, K., & Swanson, V. (2006). Predicting general well-being from self-esteem and affectivity: An exploratory study with Scottish adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1143–1151.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2013). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91.CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
29.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
30.
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43, 103–121.CrossRef
31.
Stull, D. E. (2008). Analyzing growth and change: Latent variable growth curve modeling with an application to clinical trials. Quality of Life Research, 17(1), 47–59.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
33.
Mendlewicz, J. (2010). Time in depression. Medicographia, 32(2), 109–111.
34.
Horowitz, J. L., Garber, J., Ciesla, J. A., Young, J. F., & Mufson, L. (2007). Prevention of depressive symptoms in adolescents: A randomized trial of cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal prevention programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 693–706.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Puskar, K., Sereika, S., & Tusaie-Mumford, K. (2003). Effect of the Teaching Kids to Cope (TKC) program on outcomes of depression and coping among rural adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 16(2), 71–80.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Roberts, C. M., Kane, R., Bishop, B., Cross, D., Fenton, J., & Hart, B. (2010). The prevention of anxiety and depression in children from disadvantaged schools. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 68–73.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Strecher, V. (2007). The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): New methods for more potent eHealth interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5), 112–118.CrossRef
38.
Almirall, D., Compton, S. N., Gunlicks-Stoessel, M., Duan, N., & Murphy, S. A. (2012). Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy. Statistics in Medicine, 31(17), 1887–1902.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Use of weekly assessment data to enhance evaluation of a subjective wellbeing intervention
Auteurs
Lucia Colla
Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
Adrian J. Tomyn
Ben Richardson
Justin D. Tomyn
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1150-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2016

Quality of Life Research 3/2016 Naar de uitgave

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Patients’ and health professionals’ understanding of and preferences for graphical presentation styles for individual-level EORTC QLQ-C30 scores

OriginalPaper

Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format

OriginalPaper

Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes

Original Paper

The effectiveness of a preventive health program and vitamin D status in improving health-related quality of life of older Canadians

OriginalPaper

Concurrent validity of the PROMIS® pediatric global health measure

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Evaluation of point-of-care PRO assessment in clinic settings: integration, parallel-forms reliability, and patient acceptability of electronic QOL measures during clinic visits