Assessing Mood in Daily Life
Abstract
Abstract. The repeated measurement of moods in everyday life, as is common in ambulatory monitoring, requires parsimonious scales, which may challenge the reliability of the measures. The current paper evaluates the factor structure, the reliability, and the sensitivity to change of a six-item mood scale designed for momentary assessment in daily life. We analyzed data from 187 participants who reported their current mood four times per day during seven consecutive days using a multilevel approach. The results suggest that the proposed three factors Calmness, Valence, and Energetic arousal are appropriate to assess fluctuations within persons over time. However, calmness and valence are not distinguishable at the between-person level. Furthermore, the analyses showed that two-item scales provide measures that are reliable at the different levels and highly sensitive to change.
References
Bauer, D.J. (2003). Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 135– 167Bolger, N. Davis, A. Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579– 616Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (1996). Ambulatory behavioral assessment and in-field performance testing. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment (pp. 29-50). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & HuberBuse, L. Pawlik, K. (2001). Computer-assisted ambulatory performance-tests in everyday situations: Construction, evaluation, and psychometric properties of a test battery measuring mental activation. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 3-23). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & HuberCranford, J.A. Shrout, P.E. Iida, M. Rafaeli, E. Yip, T. Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917– 929Curran, P.J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529– 569Davidson, R.J. (1994). On emotion, mood, and related affective constructs. In P. Ekman & R.J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion. Fundamental questions (pp. 51-55). New York: Oxford University PressEbner-Priemer, U.W. Sawitzki, G. (2007). Ambulatory assessment of affective instability in borderline personality disorder: The effect of the sampling frequency. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 238– 247Ekman, P. Davidson, R.J. Eds. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions . New York: Oxford University PressFahrenberg, J. (2006). Self-reported subjective state - Single items or scales like AD-ACL and PANAS? European Network of Ambulatory Assessment. Statements and Open Commentaries. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from www.ambulatory-assessment.orgFahrenberg, J. Hüttner, P. Leonhart, R. (2001). MONITOR: Acquisition of psychological data by a hand-held PC. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 93-112). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & HuberFahrenberg, J. Leonhart, R. Foerster, F. (2002). Alltagsnahe Psychologie: Datenerhebung im Feld mit hand-held PC und physiologischem Mess-System . [Psychological assessment in everyday life: Data gathering in the field by handheld personal computers and physiological monitoring systems]. Bern: HuberFahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. Pawlik, K. Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment - Monitoring behavior in daily life settings: A behavioral-scientific challenge for psychology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 206– 213Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London, UK: Edward ArnoldGorin, A.A. Stone, A.A. (2001). Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: A call for momentary assessments. In A. Baum, T.A. Revenson, & J.E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 405-413). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumKenny, D.A. Kashy, D.A. Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis . New York: GuilfordKenny, D.A. Zautra, A. (2001). Trait-state models for longitudinal data. In L.M. Collins & A.G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243-263). Washington, DC: American Psychological AssociationKlumb, P.L. (2004). Benefits form productive and consumptive activities: Results from the Berlin Aging Study. Social Indicators Research, 67, 107– 127Kubiak, T. Jonas, C. (2007). Applying circular statistics to the analysis of monitoring data: Patterns of social interactions and mood. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 227– 237Lewis, M. Haviland-Jones, J.M. Eds. (2000). Handbook of emotions (2nd ed.). New York: GuilfordLucas, R.E. Baird, B.M. (2006). Global self-assessment. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 29-42). Washington, DC: American Psychological AssociationMatthews, G. Jones, D.M. Chamberlain, A.G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17– 42Myrtek, M. (2004). Heart and emotion. Ambulatory monitoring studies in everyday life . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & HuberPerrez, M. (2006). Plädoyer für theorieadäquate Methoden in gewissen Domänen der Psychologie. [Plea for a theory-adequate methodology in certain domains of psychology] Verhaltenstherapie und Psychosoziale Praxis, 38, 319– 330Perrez, M. Schoebi, D. Wilhelm, P. (2000). How to assess social regulation of stress and emotions in daily family life? A computer-assisted family self-monitoring-system (FASEM-C). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 326– 339Rasbash, J. Steele, F. Browne, W. Prosser, B. (2005). A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0 . Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of BristolRaudenbush, S.W. Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageReicherts, M. Salamin, V. Maggiori, C. Pauls, K. (2007). The learning affect monitor (LAM): A computer-based system integrating dimensional and discrete assessment of affective states in daily life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 268– 277Robinson, M.D. Clore, G.L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934– 960Russell, J.A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145– 172Russell, J.A. Carroll, J.M. (1999a). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3– 30Russell, J.A. Carroll, J.M. (1999b). The phoenix of bipolarity: Reply to Watson and Tellegen (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 611– 617Russell, J.A. Weiss, A. Mendelsohn, G.A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493– 502Scherer, K.R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured?. Social Science Information, 44, 695– 729Schimmack, U. (1999). Strukturmodelle der Stimmungen: Rückschau, Rundschau und Ausschau. [Structural models of mood: Review, overview, and outlook] Psychologische Rundschau, 50, 90– 97Schimmack, U. (2003). Affect measurement in experience sampling research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 79– 106Schimmack, U. (2005). Response latencies of pleasure and displeasure ratings: Further evidence for mixed feelings. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 671– 691Schimmack, U. Grob, A. (2000). Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling. European Journal of Personality, 14, 325– 345Schimmack, U. Reisenzein, R. (2002). Experiencing activation: Energetic arousal and tense arousal are not mixtures of valence and activation. Emotion, 2, 412– 417Steyer, R. Riedl, K. (2004). Is it possible to feel good and bad at the same time? New evidence on the bipolarity of mood-state dimensions. K. van Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models: Theory and applications (pp. 197-220). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: KluwerSteyer, R. Schmitt, M. Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389– 408Steyer, R. Schwenkmezger, P. Notz, P. Eid, M. (1997). Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen. Handanweisung . [The Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire (MDMQ)]. Göttingen, Germany: HogrefeThayer, R.E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and activation . New York: Oxford University PressWatson, D. Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219– 235Watson, D. Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in the dimensional structure of affect - Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601– 610Watson, D. Vaidya, J. (2003). Mood measurement: Current status and future directions. In I.B. Weiner (Series Ed.) & J.A. Schinka & W.F. Velicer (Volume Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 2: Research methods in psychology (pp. 351-375). Hoboken, NJ: WileyWilhelm, P. (2004). Empathie im Alltag von Paaren. Akkuratheit und Projektion bei der Einschätzung des Befindens des Partners . [Empathy in couples' everyday lives: Accuracy and projection in judging the partner's feelings]. Bern: HuberWilhelm, P. Perrez, M. (2004). How is my partner feeling in different daily-life settings? Accuracy of spouses' judgments about their partner's feelings at work and at home. Social Indicators Research, 67, 183– 246Zelenski, J.M. Larsen, R.J. (2000). The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 178– 197Zevon, M.A. Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An ideographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111– 122