Skip to main content
Original Articles

Assessing Mood in Daily Life

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.258

Abstract. The repeated measurement of moods in everyday life, as is common in ambulatory monitoring, requires parsimonious scales, which may challenge the reliability of the measures. The current paper evaluates the factor structure, the reliability, and the sensitivity to change of a six-item mood scale designed for momentary assessment in daily life. We analyzed data from 187 participants who reported their current mood four times per day during seven consecutive days using a multilevel approach. The results suggest that the proposed three factors Calmness, Valence, and Energetic arousal are appropriate to assess fluctuations within persons over time. However, calmness and valence are not distinguishable at the between-person level. Furthermore, the analyses showed that two-item scales provide measures that are reliable at the different levels and highly sensitive to change.

References

  • Bauer, D.J. (2003). Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 135– 167 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bolger, N. Davis, A. Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579– 616 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (1996). Ambulatory behavioral assessment and in-field performance testing. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment (pp. 29-50). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (2001). Computer-assisted ambulatory performance-tests in everyday situations: Construction, evaluation, and psychometric properties of a test battery measuring mental activation. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 3-23). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cranford, J.A. Shrout, P.E. Iida, M. Rafaeli, E. Yip, T. Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917– 929 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Curran, P.J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along?. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529– 569 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davidson, R.J. (1994). On emotion, mood, and related affective constructs. In P. Ekman & R.J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion. Fundamental questions (pp. 51-55). New York: Oxford University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ebner-Priemer, U.W. Sawitzki, G. (2007). Ambulatory assessment of affective instability in borderline personality disorder: The effect of the sampling frequency. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 238– 247 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, P. Davidson, R.J. Eds. (1994). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions . New York: Oxford University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. (2006). Self-reported subjective state - Single items or scales like AD-ACL and PANAS? European Network of Ambulatory Assessment. Statements and Open Commentaries. Retrieved June 21, 2007, from www.ambulatory-assessment.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Hüttner, P. Leonhart, R. (2001). MONITOR: Acquisition of psychological data by a hand-held PC. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Progress in ambulatory assessment (pp. 93-112). Kirkland, WA: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Leonhart, R. Foerster, F. (2002). Alltagsnahe Psychologie: Datenerhebung im Feld mit hand-held PC und physiologischem Mess-System . [Psychological assessment in everyday life: Data gathering in the field by handheld personal computers and physiological monitoring systems]. Bern: Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. Pawlik, K. Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment - Monitoring behavior in daily life settings: A behavioral-scientific challenge for psychology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 206– 213 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gorin, A.A. Stone, A.A. (2001). Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: A call for momentary assessments. In A. Baum, T.A. Revenson, & J.E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 405-413). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D.A. Kashy, D.A. Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis . New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D.A. Zautra, A. (2001). Trait-state models for longitudinal data. In L.M. Collins & A.G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243-263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klumb, P.L. (2004). Benefits form productive and consumptive activities: Results from the Berlin Aging Study. Social Indicators Research, 67, 107– 127 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubiak, T. Jonas, C. (2007). Applying circular statistics to the analysis of monitoring data: Patterns of social interactions and mood. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 227– 237 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Lewis, M. Haviland-Jones, J.M. Eds. (2000). Handbook of emotions (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lucas, R.E. Baird, B.M. (2006). Global self-assessment. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 29-42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Matthews, G. Jones, D.M. Chamberlain, A.G. (1990). Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17– 42 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Myrtek, M. (2004). Heart and emotion. Ambulatory monitoring studies in everyday life . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, M. (2006). Plädoyer für theorieadäquate Methoden in gewissen Domänen der Psychologie. [Plea for a theory-adequate methodology in certain domains of psychology] Verhaltenstherapie und Psychosoziale Praxis, 38, 319– 330 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, M. Schoebi, D. Wilhelm, P. (2000). How to assess social regulation of stress and emotions in daily family life? A computer-assisted family self-monitoring-system (FASEM-C). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 326– 339 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rasbash, J. Steele, F. Browne, W. Prosser, B. (2005). A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0 . Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Raudenbush, S.W. Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reicherts, M. Salamin, V. Maggiori, C. Pauls, K. (2007). The learning affect monitor (LAM): A computer-based system integrating dimensional and discrete assessment of affective states in daily life. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 268– 277 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, M.D. Clore, G.L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934– 960 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, J.A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145– 172 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, J.A. Carroll, J.M. (1999a). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3– 30 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, J.A. Carroll, J.M. (1999b). The phoenix of bipolarity: Reply to Watson and Tellegen (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 611– 617 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Russell, J.A. Weiss, A. Mendelsohn, G.A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493– 502 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K.R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured?. Social Science Information, 44, 695– 729 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U. (1999). Strukturmodelle der Stimmungen: Rückschau, Rundschau und Ausschau. [Structural models of mood: Review, overview, and outlook] Psychologische Rundschau, 50, 90– 97 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U. (2003). Affect measurement in experience sampling research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 79– 106 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U. (2005). Response latencies of pleasure and displeasure ratings: Further evidence for mixed feelings. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 671– 691 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U. Grob, A. (2000). Dimensional models of core affect: A quantitative comparison by means of structural equation modeling. European Journal of Personality, 14, 325– 345 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schimmack, U. Reisenzein, R. (2002). Experiencing activation: Energetic arousal and tense arousal are not mixtures of valence and activation. Emotion, 2, 412– 417 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. Riedl, K. (2004). Is it possible to feel good and bad at the same time? New evidence on the bipolarity of mood-state dimensions. K. van Montfort, J. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models: Theory and applications (pp. 197-220). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. Schmitt, M. Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13, 389– 408 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. Schwenkmezger, P. Notz, P. Eid, M. (1997). Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen. Handanweisung . [The Multidimensional Mood Questionnaire (MDMQ)]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thayer, R.E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and activation . New York: Oxford University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219– 235 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in the dimensional structure of affect - Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601– 610 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. Vaidya, J. (2003). Mood measurement: Current status and future directions. In I.B. Weiner (Series Ed.) & J.A. Schinka & W.F. Velicer (Volume Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 2: Research methods in psychology (pp. 351-375). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilhelm, P. (2004). Empathie im Alltag von Paaren. Akkuratheit und Projektion bei der Einschätzung des Befindens des Partners . [Empathy in couples' everyday lives: Accuracy and projection in judging the partner's feelings]. Bern: Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilhelm, P. Perrez, M. (2004). How is my partner feeling in different daily-life settings? Accuracy of spouses' judgments about their partner's feelings at work and at home. Social Indicators Research, 67, 183– 246 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zelenski, J.M. Larsen, R.J. (2000). The distribution of basic emotions in everyday life: A state and trait perspective from experience sampling data. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 178– 197 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zevon, M.A. Tellegen, A. (1982). The structure of mood change: An ideographic/nomothetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 111– 122 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar