Plain English summary
Disturbed sleep is a major concern for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and can have a major effect on their health-related quality of life. This study aimed to better understand the interaction between sleep and pain in these conditions, as well as any other factors that may impact sleep. Thirty people with RA or axSpA were asked directly to describe their own experience with sleep disturbance, pain, fatigue, and emotional health. Most people considered pain to be a significant cause of disturbed sleep, although the relationship between pain and sleep often varied; sometimes disturbed sleep could make disease-related pain worse, and sleep disruption could occur regardless of pain or other understood causes. In addition, many of the people interviewed described disease-related factors other than pain that they felt were responsible for disrupting sleep, such as fatigue and anxiety. These perspectives from people living with RA or axSpA suggest that healthcare providers should consider and potentially manage all aspects of disturbed sleep during appointments with their patients, and not just their patients’ level of pain.
Introduction
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are common autoimmune rheumatic diseases [
1,
2]. RA is characterized by pain, swelling, and stiffness in multiple joints [
2] while axSpA is predominantly characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joints and spine, often causing back pain [
2,
3]. Patients with axSpA are classified as having either radiographic (r-axSpA, or ankylosing spondylitis [AS]) or non-radiographic (nr-axSpA) disease depending on disease features [
4].
The disease burden for patients with RA or axSpA is substantial, leading to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in terms of physical, emotional, and social well-being compared with the general population [
2,
5‐
12]. RA can lead to painful joint degeneration, functional impairment, and morbidity, and disability is common and substantial [
2]; in a large US study, 35% of participants with RA had employment-related disability after 10 years [
6]. Similarly, patients with axSpA often experience impairment or loss of physical function [
10]. Across both conditions, pain is often highlighted as one of the most unpleasant symptoms and persists even among those with well-controlled disease [
12‐
17]. Known risk factors for worse pain include poor mental health, poor physical function, and presence of comorbidities [
13,
17‐
19]. The common goals of disease management are to reduce and/or control inflammation and pain, reduce functional limitations, maintain social relationships and work ability, and decrease complications [
7,
10].
Sleep disturbance is common, and a major concern of patients with RA or axSpA [
20‐
22]. Poor sleep has been widely associated with impairing physical activity and other daily functions [
1,
8,
21‐
26]. It also exacerbates systemic inflammation (including increased circulating concentrations of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-6) and pain sensitivity, mental and physical fatigue, and mood disorders such as depression, further deteriorating the HRQoL of people with rheumatoid conditions [
27‐
31].
Several potential confounding factors exist for sleep disturbance in patients with rheumatic conditions, including pain [
27,
28]. Previous research suggests that a complex relationship exists between sleep and pain in patients with RA or axSpA [
28,
30]. However, despite evidence regarding the presence of this relationship, the direction of causality and mechanisms involved are not clear [
32]; while joint (RA) and back (axSpA) pain can disrupt sleep, studies in both conditions have demonstrated a reverse relationship, where disturbances in sleep can also aggravate pain [
23,
31,
33]. In addition, other disease-related factors of RA and axSpA, independent of pain (such as fatigue, depression, anxiety, stress, and inflammatory markers), have also been associated with sleep disturbance [
24,
31,
34‐
37].
This study aimed to better understand sleep disturbance as experienced directly by individuals with RA or axSpA, as it relates to pain and other aspects of the disease and disease activity, through descriptive evidence gathered from qualitative concept elicitation (CE) interviews. Aspects of sleep disturbance that occur independently of pain from a patient perspective, and which could be potential therapeutic targets benefiting patients’ well-being, were also explored.
Methods
Study design
This was a qualitative, non-interventional, cross-sectional study (GSK study: 213635). Sixty-minute CE interviews were conducted with 30 participants (15 with RA and 15 with axSpA) from the US.
Participants
Participants were recruited and screened in collaboration with a third-party recruitment specialist using pre-existing patient panels, recruiter databases, physician referrals, and a patient organization (Spondylitis Association of America).
Eligible participants were required to have moderate or severe RA (diagnosis received over the age of 18 years and at least 2 years prior to screening) or axSpA (either radiographic or non-radiographic), be aged ≥ 18 years old, be fluent in English, and provide a physician note prior to interview confirming their diagnosis, disease severity, and current prescribed medication. Those with RA must have scored ≥ 4 on a pain numeric rating scale (NRS) in the past 7 days as assessed during screening, while those with axSpA must have scored ≥ 4 on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and rated their back pain ≥ 4 on a 0–10 NRS in the past 7 days. All participants reported sleep problems in the past 14 days during screening (e.g., woke up in the middle of the night and could not fall back to sleep; woke up early in the morning; had trouble initiating and maintaining sleep). These sleep problems were not required to be specific to their condition.
Participants were originally excluded if they had a history of other inflammatory rheumatologic or systemic autoimmune disorder, other than Sjögren’s syndrome secondary to RA or axSpA. This was subsequently adjusted for those with axSpA due to difficulties in recruiting individuals who did not have a comorbid inflammatory condition. Therefore, axSpA participants were eligible if they had a history of mixed connective tissue disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or RA. For those with axSpA and comorbid RA, restrictions were set to include only those who had not experienced RA-related pain in the past 7 days.
Given the overlap in the experiences of RA and axSpA [
38], a total of 30 participants (15 with each condition) was determined by saturation analysis (see “
Data analysis” section) to be sufficient to capture all relevant information related to sleep and pain in the two conditions. While no specific participant quotas other than a diagnosis of RA or axSpA were set, purposive sampling [
39‐
41] was used to recruit a diverse participant group in terms of geographic region, sex, and race/ethnicity. All participants provided written, informed consent prior to their scheduled interview.
Qualitative CE interviews
One-on-one CE interviews were conducted (via telephone or video call) by trained qualitative researchers using a semi-structured interview guide [
42]. The guide was developed using findings from a review of published literature related to sleep disturbance in RA and axSpA and subsequently finalized following input from a panel of five people with RA from the US.
Interviews began with a brief overview of the study, and the participant provided consent to audio-record the interview. This was followed by introductory questions intended to provide background information and establish rapport with the participant. Next, the interviewer asked a series of questions designed to elicit descriptions of participants’ experience with sleep disturbances associated with their RA or axSpA. Specifically, questions explored potential causes of sleep disturbances at times when participants did and did not experience pain.
Although conversations were guided by the semi-structured interview guide, interviewers also used their discretion to further probe different aspects of participants’ responses (for both elaboration and clarification). Combining the semi-structured interview guide and ad hoc probing allowed the study team to gather detailed descriptions of participants’ experience with sleep disturbance related to their condition. Interview recordings were subsequently transcribed verbatim for concept coding and analysis.
Data analysis
Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo software (v.12; QSR International Pty Ltd., 2018) and analyzed using a combination of thematic and content analysis to explore themes related to pain and sleep disturbance, and to analyze relationships among those themes [
43,
44]. Transcripts were first reviewed in full for familiarity; they were then read again and considered line by line. During this process, relevant text was assigned to a code that described the content being coded.
Content was analyzed and (as appropriate) text assigned to a set of a priori codes (i.e., codes developed in advance and linked to the questions in the interview guide). These codes were based on concepts of interest to the research question (e.g., sleep, pain, fatigue). Additional themes of interest (not pre-determined) were also identified in the text using thematic analysis and assigned to new codes [
45]. All codes were iteratively refined and grouped, as appropriate, into larger themes representing similar ideas.
Relationship codes were also developed and used to capture links between concepts. For example, if participants noted that pain influenced their sleep, content would be coded to “pain”, and “influence on sleep”. Once all data were coded, themes were analyzed and matrices were run to identify and examine relationships among concepts, including directional relationships.
Saturation analyses [
46] were conducted to confirm the size of the participant groups was adequate to fully explore concepts of interest, and that additional interviews would not have resulted in the identification of new concepts or relationships for either the RA or axSpA participants.
Several strategies were employed to pursue the trustworthiness of our analyses. The members of the research team are trained extensively in qualitative research, and were fully briefed on the research questions and goals of the current study prior to commencing data collection. The varied experiences and professional backgrounds of the study team were considered during training to promote data collection and interpretation that avoided bias from prior assumptions. Researcher triangulation and constant comparison was used to review interviewer field notes, coding, and analyses, to promote fidelity of data collection and integrity, and to reduce the possibility that any single researcher’s viewpoint was privileged over that of others. Credibility was bolstered through interview debriefing meetings to assess and promote congruence across interviewers, and to promote collaboration of perspective. Coders also met regularly to discuss interpretations and alternative explanations before determining the findings. Dependability was partly pursued with coder reliability, as two researchers independently coded the first three transcripts and then met with the principal investigator to discuss any discrepancies and reach consensus, before independently coding the remaining transcripts. Discrepancies and decisions taken were documented, including adjustments to the code book, and ad hoc meetings were held throughout the coding process to discuss concerns. Regarding confirmability, the research team generated a detailed audit trial of methodological decisions, coding guidelines, and query output to allow for replicability. The use of purposive sampling and the inclusion of a diverse sample increased the likelihood that findings could be applicable and transferable to the larger population of individuals with these conditions.
Discussion
This qualitative CE interview study found that pain was a prominent driver of sleep disturbance in participants with RA or axSpA, resulting in trouble both falling asleep and staying asleep. A bi-directional relationship, whereby pain worsened sleep disturbance and sleep disturbance further aggravated pain, was described by approximately two-thirds of all participants with RA or axSpA. In addition, other factors were identified as influencing sleep disturbance, including disease-related causes other than pain (e.g., anxiety, fatigue, stiff, locking joints) or other known aspects related to disease management (e.g., medication), causes unrelated to disease (e.g., needing to use the restroom), and unknown causes.
Sleep disturbance is common in patients with rheumatic conditions [
27,
30]. It has been reported that over half (54.8%) of patients with AS experience sleep disturbance [
20,
21], while the prevalence of sleep disturbance in patients with RA has been estimated at 60–80% compared with 10–30% in the general population [
22]. While management of the underlying disease, specifically pain, has the potential to improve sleep outcomes for some patients, pain may not always be considered or well-treated in RA and axSpA for a variety of reasons, including misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis, and therapy-related, physician-related, and patient-related factors [
2,
47,
48]. Furthermore, several studies have shown that pain persists in many people with RA, despite commencing new treatments for their disease including tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors [
13].
In the current study, half of all participants with RA or axSpA reported sleep disturbance occurred without pain or other understood causes. This suggests that sleep disturbance may be a separate symptom of the disease, and/or prompted by other disease-related factors. In addition, many participants with RA or axSpA described factors other than pain that were responsible for disrupting sleep, such as fatigue and emotional health. Participants with RA or axSpA recognized and described similar complex interconnections between fatigue, emotional health, pain, and sleep. Although they often reported pain as the driver of the relationship between sleep, fatigue, and emotional health, they sometimes acknowledged uncertainty regarding which was the precipitating factor.
Efforts were taken to employ strategies to mitigate impacts of study limitations, although these limitations should be acknowledged. While an attempt was made to recruit a mix of participants with nr-axSpA and AS, specific quotas were not established and so most of those recruited had AS (87%). While no clear differences were noted in the responses of these two types of participants, it is possible that the sample with axSpA included in this study may have more advanced or severe disease and symptoms, including pain. Further studies that explore the relationship between pain and sleep in those with earlier disease (i.e., nr-axSpA) would be of interest.
Attempts were also made to recruit a demographically balanced study population, although participants included in this study were predominantly female. This reflects the higher prevalence of females diagnosed with rheumatic conditions in the broader population, with females three times more likely than males to be diagnosed with an autoimmune rheumatic condition [
49]. There were no prominent differences noted in the experience of sleep and pain between males and females in this study.
Participants were eligible for this study if they experienced pain due to their condition in the past 7 days. Future studies may benefit from exploring sleep disturbance in those who do not experience pain as a point of comparison, and to better investigate sleep difficulty outside of pain.
Finally, interviews were conducted during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic which may have contributed to fatigue, emotional health, and sleep loss in study participants, in common with the general population [
50‐
54].
The study also has some noteworthy strengths, including the use of a semi-structured interview consisting of open-ended questions in combination with ad hoc probing which was successful in capturing patients’ own perspectives of the relationship between sleep and pain and other factors. Participants with RA and axSpA recognized and described similar complex interconnections between sleep disturbance, pain, fatigue, and emotional health. In addition, they were able to identify non-disease-related factors that interrupted their sleep, confirming their ability to thoughtfully discern different reasons for their sleep disturbance. Overall, participants confirmed findings from existing literature by describing factors other than pain (e.g., fatigue and emotional health) that were sometimes responsible for their disrupted sleep.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mark Kosinski of QualityMetric Inc for initial discussions around study concept and design, the Spondylitis Association of America for their help in recruiting study participants, and the panel of patients with rheumatoid arthritis whose input helped to inform the design and development of the interview guide used in this study. Editorial support (in the form of writing assistance, including preparation of the draft manuscript under the direction and guidance of the authors, collating and incorporating authors’ comments for each draft, assembling tables and figures, grammatical editing, and referencing) was provided by Tony Reardon of Apollo, OPEN Health Communications, and was funded by GSK.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.