Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Gepubliceerd in:

15-02-2019 | Original Paper

A Comparison of Video Prompting to Least-to-Most Prompting among Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability

Auteurs: Mashal Salman Aljehany, Kyle D. Bennett

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 5/2020

Abstract

Students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) may experience challenges when learning tasks that are complex and require numerous steps. This difficulty can lead to employment issues for this population of learners. Therefore, researchers have explored methods to teach employment-related tasks to students with ASD and ID. Two such procedures are video prompting (VP) and least-to-most prompting. These procedures are frequently combined as an intervention package to boost student responding. The purpose of this study was to explore which of these interventions was more effective and efficient when used to teach office tasks to individuals with ASD and ID. Three adolescent students participated in this study. Using the adapted alternating treatments design, we found that VP was more effective and efficient for two participants, whereas least-to-most prompting was more effective but less efficient for the remaining participant. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

vorige artikel Sleep Disturbances Increase the Impact of Working Memory Deficits on Learning Problems in Adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder

volgende artikel Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent in Males and Females with Fragile X Syndrome

Alexander, J. L., Smith, K. A., Mataras, T., Shelpey, S. B., & Ayres, K. M. (2015). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature to evaluate potential threats to internal validity in probe procedures for chained tasks. Journal of Special Education, 49, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466914550096.CrossRef

Ayres, K. M., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Dependent measures and measurement systems. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn., pp. 124–153). New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Banda, D. R., Dogoe, M. S., & Matuszny, R. (2011). Review of video prompting studies with persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 514–527.

Bellini, S., & Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300301.CrossRef

Bennett, K. D., Aljehany, M. S., & Altaf, E. M. (2017). Systematic review of video-based instruction component and parametric analyses. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417690255.CrossRef

Bennett, K. D., Gutierrez, A., & Honsberger, T. (2013). A comparison of video prompting with and without voice-over narration on the clerical skills of adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 1273–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.013.CrossRef

Cannella-Malone, H., Miller, O., Schaefer, J. M., Jimenez, E. D., Page, E. J., & Sabielny, L. M. (2016). Using video prompting to teach leisure skills to students with significant disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82, 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598778.CrossRef

Cannella-Malone, H. I., Chan, J. M., & Jimenez, E. D. (2017). Comparing self-directed video prompting to least-to-most prompting in post-secondary students with moderate intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1301695.CrossRef

Cannella-Malone, H. I., Sabielny, L. M., Jimenez, E. D., & Miller, M. M. (2013). Pick one! Conducting preference assessments with students with significant disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(6), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500602.CrossRef

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd edn.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Domire, S. C., & Wolfe, P. (2014). Effects of video prompting techniques on teaching daily living skills to children with autism spectrum disorders: A review. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914555578.CrossRef

Gardner, S. J., & Wolfe, P. S. (2015). Teaching students with developmental disabilities daily living skills using point-of-view modeling plus video prompting with error correction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614547810.CrossRef

Gast, D. L. (2014). General factors in measurement and evaluation. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn., pp. 85–104). New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2014). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn., pp. 176–211). New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Hendricks, D. (2010). Employment and adults with autism spectrum disorders: Challenges and strategies for success. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 32, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2010-0502.CrossRef

Johnson, J. W., Blood, E., Freeman, A., & Simmons, K. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of teacher-implemented video prompting on an iPad Touch to teach food-preparation skills to high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357613476344.CrossRef

Kraijer, D. (2000). Review of adaptive behavior studies in mentally retarded persons with autism/pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005460027636.CrossRefPubMed

Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (2010). Childhood autism rating scale (2nd edn.). Torrance: Western Psychological Publishing.

Ulke-Kurkcuoglu, B. (2015). A comparison of least-to-most prompting and video modeling for teaching pretend play skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15, 499–517. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.2.2541.CrossRef

Van Laarhoven, T., Johnson, J., Van Laarhoven-Myers, T., Grider, K., & Grider, K. (2009). The effectiveness of using a video iPod as a prompting device in employment settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18, 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9077-6.CrossRef

Wilson, K. P. (2013). Incorporating video modeling into a school-based intervention for students with autism spectrum disorder. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0098.CrossRefPubMed

Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Dyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains. NY: Longman.

Wolery, M., Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Comparison designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn., pp. 377–396). New York: Routledge.

Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., Brock, M.E., Plavnick, J.B., Fleury, V.P., Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A Comparison of Video Prompting to Least-to-Most Prompting among Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability
Auteurs: Mashal Salman Aljehany
Kyle D. Bennett
Publicatiedatum: 15-02-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03929-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2020

Sibling Bullying in Middle Childhood is Associated with Psychosocial Difficulties in Early Adolescence: The Case of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

No Sex Differences in Cognitive Ability in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Sleep Disturbances Increase the Impact of Working Memory Deficits on Learning Problems in Adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief Report: Evaluating College Students’ Perceptions of a Child Displaying Stereotypic Behaviors: Do Changes in Stereotypy Levels Affect Ratings?

Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent in Males and Females with Fragile X Syndrome

Exploring the Role of Empathy in Understanding the Social-Cognitive Profile for Individuals Referred for Autism Spectrum Disorders Assessment in Adulthood