Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Health state utilities measured by the major multi-attribute utility instruments differ. Understanding the reasons for this is important for the choice of instrument and for research designed to reconcile these differences. This paper investigates these reasons by explaining pairwise differences between utilities derived from six multi-attribute utility instruments in terms of (1) their implicit measurement scales; (2) the structure of their descriptive systems; and (3) ‘micro-utility effects’, scale-adjusted differences attributable to their utility formula.
The EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D and AQoL-8D were administered to 8,019 individuals. Utilities and unweighted values were calculated using each instrument. Scale effects were determined by the linear relationship between utilities, the effect of the descriptive system by comparison of scale-adjusted values and ‘micro-utility effects’ by the unexplained difference between utilities and values.
Overall, 66 % of the differences between utilities was attributable to the descriptive systems, 30.3 % to scale effects and 3.7 % to micro-utility effects.
Results imply that the revision of utility algorithms will not reconcile differences between instruments. The dominating importance of the descriptive system highlights the need for researchers to select the instrument most capable of describing the health states relevant for a study.
Reconciliation of inconsistent utilities produced by different instruments must focus primarily upon the content of the descriptive system. Utility weights primarily determine the measurement scale. Other differences, attributable to utility formula, are comparatively unimportant.
Richardson, J., McKie, J., & Bariola, E. (2014). Multi attribute utility instruments and their use. In A. J. Culyer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health economics (pp. 341–357). San Diego: Elsevier Science. CrossRef
WHO. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization http://apps.who.int/classifications/icfbrowser/ Accessed 27 July 2013.
Richardson, J., Khan, M. A., Iezzi, A., & Maxwell, A. (2014). Comparing and explaining differences in the content, sensitivity and magnitude of incremental utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB and AQoL-8D multi attribute utility instruments’. Medical Decision Making,. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14543107. PubMed
Richardson, J., Khan, M. A., Iezzi, A., & Maxwell, A. (2012). Cross- national comparison of twelve quality of life instruments: MIC paper 1: Background, questions, instruments, research paper 76. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/che/pubs/researchpaper76.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2013.
Richardson, J., Khan, M. A., Iezzi, A., & Maxwell, A. (2012). Cross- national comparison of twelve quality of life instruments, research papers 78, 80– 83, 85. MIC report: 2: Australia; 3: UK; 4: USA; 5: Canada; 6: Norway; 7: Germany. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/che/che-publications.html Accessed 25 Jan 2013.
Richardson, J., Cummins, R. A., Olsen, J. A., Kaplan, R., Coast, J., & Schlander, M. (2015). The Multi instrument comparison (MIC) database, http://www.aqol.com.au/index.php/aqol-current. Accessed 16 Jan 2015.
Sintonen, H., & Pekurinen, M. (1993). A fifteen-dimensional measure of health related quality of life (15D) and its applications. In S. Walker & R. Rosser (Eds.), Quality of life assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rabin, R., Oemar, M., Oppe, M., Janssen, B., & Herdman, M. (2011). EQ-5D-5L User guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ- 5D- 5L instrument. Rotterdam: EuroQoL Group, http://www.euroqol.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/Folders_Flyers/UserGuide_EQ-5D-5L.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2014.
Richardson J., Chen G., Khan M. A., Lezzi A. (2014). Can multi attribute utility instruments adequately account for subjective well-being? Medical Decsion Making. Accepted 13 Dec 2014.
- Why do multi-attribute utility instruments produce different utilities: the relative importance of the descriptive systems, scale and ‘micro-utility’ effects
Munir A. Khan
- Springer International Publishing