Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Mindfulness-based programs for adolescents have become increasingly popular, in line with preliminary evidence supporting their positive effects on psychological functioning. More studies are needed to establish the validity of mindfulness measures for adolescents, in particular with regard to gender differences. This study used confirmatory factor analysis to test the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the recently developed Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measures (CAMM) with non-clinical adolescents aged 12 to 15 years (N = 562). Additionally, the study aimed to assess the internal consistency of the CAMM with this sample and to determine its convergent validity. All analyses were conducted for the entire sample as well as for males and females separately. Results confirmed the one-dimensional factor structure of the CAMM and the internal consistency of the ten CAMM items, and there were no significant gender group differences. The convergent validity was also supported, with significant correlations between CAMM scores and measures of psychological functioning/distress in the expected directions. When considering correlations separately by gender, mindfulness was weakly but significantly correlated with positive affect in females but not in males. All other correlations were comparable across gender. Overall, the CAMM appears to be a reliable and valid mindfulness measure for both boys and girls.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment 11(3), 191–206.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications.
Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. CrossRef
Burke, C. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: a preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 133–144. CrossRef
De Bruin, E. I., Zijlstra, B. J., & Bögels, S. M. (2013). The meaning of mindfulness in children and adolescents: further validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in two independent samples from the Netherlands. Mindfulness. doi: 10.1007/s12671-013-0196-8.
Greenberg, M. T., & Harris, A. R. (2012). Nurturing mindfulness in children and youth: current state of research. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 161–166. CrossRef
Harnett, P. H., & Dawe, S. (2012). Review: the contribution of mindfulness-based therapies for children and families and proposed conceptual integration. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00643.x.
Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., et al. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect in children: scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 326–338. CrossRef
Lechtenberg, M. M. (2012). Assessing the adolescent experience of mindfulness. Kansas State University.
MacKillop, J., & Anderson, E. J. (2007). Further psychometric validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 289–293. CrossRef
Mathai, J., Anderson, P., & Bourne, A. (2003). Use of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire as an outcome measure in a child and adolescent mental health service. Australasian Psychiatry, 11(3), 334–337. CrossRef
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Rempel, K. D. (2012). Mindfulness for children and youth: a review of the literature with an argument for school-based implementation. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 46(3), 201–220.
Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337. CrossRef
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Belmont: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
Tan, L. B. G., & Martin, G. (2012). Mind full or mindful: A report on mindfulness and psychological health in healthy adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 1–11.
Wong, S. S. (2012). Negative thinking versus positive thinking in a Singaporean student sample: relationships with psychological well-being and psychological maladjustment. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 76–82. CrossRef
- Validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) with Non-Clinical Adolescents
Amina K. Kuby
- Springer US