Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

11-02-2022

The Validation of a Five-Item Screening Scale for Personality Disorders in Dutch-Speaking Community Adolescents and Adults

Auteurs: Kristina Eggermont, Koen Luyckx, Dirk Smits, Annabel Bogaerts, Tinne Buelens, Tim Bastiaens, Laurence Claes

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 2/2022

Abstract

In Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – fifth edition (DSM-5), an Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) is proposed, including a criterion for personality functioning impairment (Criterion A) to assess severity of personality pathology. The present study examined the structure, reliability, and convergent validity of the Dutch version of a five-item screening scale for Criterion A—the Five-Item Screening Scale for Personality Disorders (FISSPD; Skodol et al., in Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4-22, 2011)—in a community sample of 1,477 adolescents and 546 adults. To assess convergent validity, identity and personality (pathology) questionnaires were completed by adolescents and adults. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a single factor structure for the FISSPD, which proved to be (partially) invariant across age and gender. Adequate reliability coefficients were obtained for the FISSPD. In both the adolescent and adult sample, significant correlations were found between the FISSPD and consolidated identity (negative) and disturbed identity/lack of identity (positive). In the adult sample, the FISSPD showed significant correlations with several personality disorders (and especially with the borderline personality disorder), maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B of the AMPD), and general personality impairment. In the adolescent sample, the FISSPD was positively correlated with borderline personality disorder characteristics. Furthermore, significant correlations were found with the Big-Five personality traits in the adolescent sample: the FISSPD correlated significantly positive with neuroticism, and negative with extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. In sum, the present study supports the reliability and validity of the FISSPD to screen for (severity of) personality pathology.

vorige artikel Longitudinal Associations Between the Five-Factor Model of Personality and The Bi-Factor Model of Psychopathology: Continuity, Pathoplasty and Complication Effects in Adolescents

volgende artikel The Relationship Between a Hierarchical Transdiagnostic Model of Vulnerability Factors and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Clusters

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder (5th ed.). Author.CrossRef

Arnevik, E., Wilberg, T., Monsen, J. T., Andrea, H., & Karterud, S. (2009). A cross-national validity study of the Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118). Personality and Mental Heatlh, 3, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.60CrossRef

Bastiaens, T., Claes, L., Smits, D., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G., Vanwalleghem, D., Vermote, R., Lowyck, B., Claes, S., & De Hert, M. (2016). The construct validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample. Assessment, 23, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115575069CrossRefPubMed

Benzi, I. M. A., Fontana, A., Di Pierro, R., Perugini, M., Cipresso, P., Madeddu, F., Clarkin, J. G., & Preti, E. (2021). Assessment of personality functioning in adolescence: development of the adolescent personality structure questionnaire. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120988157CrossRefPubMed

Birkhölzer, M., Schmeck, K., & Goth, K. (2020). A state-of-the-art overview of the assessment of Criterion A of Personality Disorders. Current Opinion in Psychology, 37, 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.009CrossRefPubMed

Bogaerts, A., Claes, L., Buelens, T., Gandhi, A., Kiekens, G., Bastiaens, T., & Luyckx, K. (2021a). The self-concept and identity measure in adolescents: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and associations with identity, personality traits, and borderline personality features. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000623CrossRef

Bogaerts, A., Claes, L., Buelens, T., Verschueren, M., Palmeroni, N., Bastiaens, T., & Luyckx, K. (2021b). Identity synthesis and confusion in early to lade adolescents: Age trends, gender differences, and associations with depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 87, 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.01.006CrossRefPubMed

Bogaerts, A., Claes, L., Verschueren, M., Bastiaens, T., Kaufman, E. A., Smits, D., & Luyckx, K. (2018). The Dutch Self-Concept and Identity Measure (SCIM): Factor structure and associations with identity dimensions and psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.007CrossRef

Bogaerts, A., Luyckx, K., Bastiaens, T., Kaufman, E. A., & Claes, L. (2021c). Identity impairment as a central dimension in personality pathology. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 43, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09804-9CrossRef

Buelens, T., Luyckx, K., Kiekens, G., Gandhi, A., Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Claes, L. (2020a). Investigating the DSM-5 criteria for non-suicidal self-injury disorder in a community sample of adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 260, 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.09.009CrossRefPubMed

Buelens, T., Costantini, G., Luyckx, K., & Claes, L. (2020b). Comorbidity between non-suicidal self-injury disorder and borderline personality disorder in adolescents: A graphical network approach. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.580922CrossRef

Carreiras, D., Loureiro, M., Cunha, M., Sharp, C., & Castilho, P. (2020). Validation of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children (BPFS-C) and for Parents (BPFS-P) for the Portuguese population. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 3265–3275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01800-7CrossRef

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Wille, B., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113475808CrossRefPubMed

Denissen, J. J. A., Geenen, R., van Aken, M. A. G., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). Development and validation of a Dutch Translation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701845229CrossRefPubMed

Distel, M. A., Trull, T. J., Willemsen, G., Vink, J. M., Derom, C. A., Lynskey, M., Martin, N. G., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The five-factor model of personality and borderline personality disorder: A genetic analysis of comorbidity. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.017CrossRefPubMed

Feenstra, D. J., Hutsebaut, J., Verheul, R., & Busschbach, J. J. V. (2011). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118) in adolescents: Reliability and validity. Psychological Assessment, 23, 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022995CrossRefPubMed

Erikson, E. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.

Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Grant, J. D., Maples, J., Trull, T. J., Nelson, E. C., Oltmanns, T. F., Martin, N. G., Lynskey, M. T., & Agrawal, A. (2016). Trait-based assessment of borderline personality disorder using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Phenotypic and genetic support. Psychological Assessment, 28, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000142CrossRefPubMed

Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE.

Fossati, A., Krueger, R., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113504984CrossRefPubMed

Fossati, A., Sharp, C., Borroni, S., & Somma, A. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children-11 (BPFSC-11) in a sample of community dwelling Italian adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35, 70–77. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000377CrossRef

Fossati, A., & Somma, A. (2021). The assessment of personality pathology in adolescence from the perspective of the alternative DSM-5 Model for personality disorder. Current Opinion in Psychology, 37, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.07.015CrossRefPubMed

Gamache, D., Savard, C., Leclerc, P., & Côté, A. (2019). Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM-5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10, 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000335CrossRef

Gerlitz, J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes (Vol. 4).

Goth, K., Birkhölzer, M., & Schmeck, K. (2018). Assessment of personality functioning in adolescents with the LoPF-Q 12–18 self-report questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1489258CrossRefPubMed

Haltigan, J. D., & Vaillancourt, T. (2016). The borderline personality features scale for children (BPFS-C): Factor structure and measurement invariance across time and sex in a community-based sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9550-1CrossRef

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=buschmanart

Hopwood, C. J., Good, E. W., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660CrossRefPubMed

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indexes in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424CrossRef

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef

Huprich, S. K., Nelson, S. M., Meehan, K. V., Siefert, C. J., Haggerty, G., Sexton, J., Dauphin, V. B., Macaluso, M., Jackson, J., Zackula, R., & Baade, L. (2018). Introduction of the DSM-5 levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000264CrossRef

Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report questionnaire for the assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief From (LPFS-BF). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research and Treatment, 7, 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000159CrossRef

Hutsebaut, J., Kamphuis, J. H., Feenstra, D. J., Weekers, L. C., & De Saeger, H. (2017). Assessing DSM-5 oriented level of personality functioning: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STIP-5.1). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 8, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000197CrossRef

Jane, J. S., Oltmanns, T. F., South, S. C., & Turkheimer, E. (2007). Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorder: An item response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kaufman, E. A., Cundiff, J. M., & Crowell, S. E. (2015). The development, factor structure, and validation of the Self-Concept and Identity Measure (SCIM): A self-report assessment of clinical identity disturbance. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9441-2CrossRef

Kaufman, E. A., Montgomery, M. J., & Crowell, S. E. (2014). Identity-related dysfunction: Integrating clinical and developmental perspectives. Identity, 14, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2014.944699CrossRef

Kendler, K. S., Myers, J., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2011). Borderline personality disorder traits and their relationship with dimensions of normative personality: A web-based cohort and twin study. Acta Pyschiatrica Scandinavica, 123, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01653.xCrossRef

Koster, N., Hopwood, C. J., Goodman, M., & Zanarini, M. C. (2019). Correlates between five-factor model traits and the Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines dimensions in an adolescent clinical sample. Personality and Mental Health, 13, 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1459CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674CrossRefPubMed

Li, C.-H. (2016a). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–9493. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7

Li, C.-H. (2016b). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093

Livesley, W. J. (2006). General assessment of personality disorder (GAPD). Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia.

Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Samuel, D. B., Williamson, R. L., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM–5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1195–2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120CrossRefPubMed

Morey, L. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1302–1308. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000450CrossRefPubMed

Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM–5, Part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.577853CrossRefPubMed

Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). Stability and change in personality disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185637CrossRefPubMed

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables: user’s guide (Version 8). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.

Nelson, S. M., Huprich, S. K., Meehan, K. B., Siefert, C., Haggerty, G., Sexton, J., Dauphin, V. B., Macaluso, M., Zackula, R., Baade, L., & Jackson, J. (2018). Convergent and discriminant validity and utility of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire (DLOPFQ): Associations with medical health care provider ratings and measures of physical health. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1492415CrossRefPubMed

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/00219010.88.5.879CrossRef

Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002

Schotte, C. K. W., De Doncker, D., Dmitruk, D., Van Mulders, I., D’Haenen, H., & Cosyns, P. (2006). The ADP-IV questionnaire: Differential validity and concordance with the semi-structured interview. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2004.18.4.405CrossRef

Schotte, C. K. W., De Doncker, D., Vankerckhoven, C., Vertommen, H., & Cosyns, P. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders, measurement of trait and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007041CrossRefPubMed

Sharp, C. (2017). Bridging the gap: The assessment and treatment of adolescent personality disorder in routine clinical care. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 102, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-310072CrossRefPubMed

Sharp, C. (2020). Adolescent personality pathology and the alternative model for personality disorders: Self development as nexus. Psychopathology, 53, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507588CrossRefPubMed

Sharp, C., Steinberg, L., Temple, J., & Newlin, E. (2014). An 11-item measure to assess borderline traits in adolescents: Refinement of the BPFSC using IRT. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000057CrossRef

Sharp, C., & De Clercq, B. (2020). Personality pathology in youth. In C. Lejuez & K. L. Gratz (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality disorders (pp. 74–90). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333931.015

Sharp, C., & Tackett, J. L. (2014). An idea whose time has come. In C. Sharp & J. L. Tackett (Eds.), Handbook of borderline personality disorder in children and adolescents (pp. 3–8). Springer.CrossRef

Sharp, C., Vanwoerden, S., & Wall, K. (2018). Adolescence as a sensitive period for the development of personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41, 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2018.07.004CrossRef

Sharp, C., & Wall, K. (2018). Personality pathology grows up: Adolescence as a sensitive period. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.11.010CrossRefPubMed

Shi, D., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2020). Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434CrossRef

Shiner, R. L. (2009). The development of personality disorders: Perspectives from normal personality development in childhood and adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000406CrossRefPubMed

Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Oldham, J. M., Clark, L. A., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Siever, L. J. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part II: Clinical application. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021891CrossRef

Sleep, C. E., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., Crowe, M. L., & Miller, J. D. (2019). An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 31, 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000620CrossRefPubMed

Statistics Belgium. (2016). Population by age, gender, and educational level. Accessed 1 Dec 2016, from https://bestat.statbel.fgov.be/bestat/crosstable.xhtml?datasource=949f8596-b42d-4262-94bf-c5949ef71bbf

Vanwoerden, S., Garey, L., Ferguson, T., Temple, J. R., & Sharp, C. (2019). Borderline Personality Features Scale for Children-11: Measurement invariance over time and across gender in a community sample of adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 31, 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000640CrossRefPubMed

Verheul, R., Andrea, H., Berghout, C. C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J. J. V., van der Kroft, P. J., Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.23CrossRefPubMed

Weekers, L. C., Hutsebaut, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2018). The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief instrument for assessing level of personality functioning. Personality and Mental Health, 13, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1434CrossRefPubMed

Weiss, B. A. (2011). Fisher’s r-to-Z transformation calculator to compare two independent samples [Computer software]. Accessed 20 Apr 2021, from https://blogs.gwu.edu/weissba/teaching/calculators/fishers-z-transformation/

Widiger, T. A., Gore, W. G., Crego, C., Rojas, S. L., & Oltmanns, J. R. (2017). Five-factor model and personality disorder. In T. E. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 449–478). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.4

Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zimmerman, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pretsch, J., Alexopoulous, J., Spitzer, C., Benecke, C., Krueger, R. B., Markon, K. E., & Leising, D. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130CrossRef

Zimmerman, J., Kerber, A., Rek, K., Hopwood, C. J., & Krueger, R. F. (2019). A brief but comprehensive review of research on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-1079-zCrossRef

Titel: The Validation of a Five-Item Screening Scale for Personality Disorders in Dutch-Speaking Community Adolescents and Adults
Auteurs: Kristina Eggermont
Koen Luyckx
Dirk Smits
Annabel Bogaerts
Tinne Buelens
Tim Bastiaens
Laurence Claes
Publicatiedatum: 11-02-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-09951-1

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2022

Risking Everything in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: An Analogue Decision-Making Study

Does Symptom Linkage Density Predict Outcomes in Cognitive Therapy for Recurrent Depression?

COVID-19 Impact Battery: Development and Validation

A Psychometric Investigation of the Ohio Scales, Short Form, Problem Severity Domain, Youth- and Caregiver-Report Versions

Intolerance of Uncertainty and Anxiety Symptoms: Examining the Indirect Effect Through Anxiety Sensitivity Among Adults with Anxiety-Related Disorders

Development and Validation of a Measure of Self-Efficacy to Resist Nonsuicidal Self-Injury